NameSilo
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
17
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Post video, so then we can see squirming.

It's being reported denials are being printed out and hand delivered to Trump. Rand says they should take lie detector tests.

DmYWmSUUUAARFHi.jpg
 
0
•••
Don't feel to bad democrats, GOP will do something next week and you can have a good laugh.
 
0
•••
Don't feel to bad democrats, GOP will do something next week and you can have a good laugh.

Will have one this coming November and then November 2020 aka mr-x vacation time.
 
0
•••
Please share these thoughts approved by your leadership.

Post video, so then we can see squirming.

It's being reported denials are being printed out and hand delivered to Trump. Rand says they should take lie detector tests.

DmYWmSUUUAARFHi.jpg
 
0
•••
Will have one this coming November and then November 2020 aka mr-x vacation time.

I guess you didn't see my vacation pics from Cali last week?

Dogs_New_Breed_Of_Sheep_Dog.jpg
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
It's being reported denials are being printed out and hand delivered to Trump. Rand says they should take lie detector tests.

And there were threats to arrest them. On what charges???

Thumbtacks in shoes ... (Oceans 11, anyone?)
 
0
•••
If โ€œeverybody knew about itโ€, it wouldnโ€™t be โ€œdeep stateโ€ now, would it?

That's a non sequitur. But, whatever you choose to believe.

It's rather hard to discuss the big dog in the room if one person refuses to admit that there is a big dog in the room and insists it's all a hallucination - despite the sight, the smell, the barking, the complaints from neighbors and the fleas.
 
3
•••
I figured out who it is. It's not just 1 person, but rather a team, spoiler alert............ The Conway's, Kellyanne and George. I had my team tap them last year. Some transcript from their bedroom 2 weeks ago:

As they were lying in a bed after a long day.

George - How was work honey?

Kellyanne - Oh George, let me tell you, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, I really love this country, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, I want to have a job here in DC after Trump leaves blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,

George - You know snookums, Trump is only 2 more years, I'm your forever.

Kellyanne - Oh Georgie Pie, that's why I love you. I want to let the world know that we have people watching and it'll be ok.

George - I have a plan

------------

George is very outspoken against Trump:
George's Twitter - https://twitter.com/gtconway3d?lang=en

Kellyanne, if you've ever listened to her, is a bit of a snake. Just listen to the Woodward audio posted earlier in the thread. Trump, Woodward, Kellyanne, just listen to her.

Trump is dumb, dumb, dumb for having her that close to him, knowing what her husband says about him.

Then:

Appearing on "Fox & Friends" on Monday, Conway addressed comments by Ronald Kessler, author of a new book on the Trump administration, who claimed that โ€œConway is the number one leakerโ€ while promoting his book on CNN on Sunday. Conway noted that she was โ€œvery happy that thereโ€™s a lot less leaking in the White House now then there was,โ€ before appearing to put the blame for leaks on Bannon without mentioning the former Breitbart chief by name.

https://www.newsweek.com/kellyanne-conway-implies-steve-bannon-was-source-white-house-leaks-868459

She's been the main source of leaks all this time. Family (George) first.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Meanwhile:

DmSXG-iW0AEyMro.jpg
 
1
•••
Meanwhile:

DmSXG-iW0AEyMro.jpg

I remember watching a 60 Minutes episode years ago, some college kids were protesting how much some kids were getting paid making stuff. They were actually successful in getting it shut down. One of the workers that was affected, went back to prostitution.

I myself think they don't get paid enough, people getting taking advantage of, still do. But it's about perspective. I've seen people post in this forum they could live a good life just making $200 a month. I spend more on food alone. See the picture above, looks like adults, not kids. So then I'm thinking, if there was a better job out there, wouldn't they be doing that, instead of making those shoes?

Also, your boy Trump is still taking advantage of that cheap labor. You going to hold him to the same standards? He got that tax cut for himself and his buddies, didn't bring the manufacturing of Trump products to the U.S.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
nice interview...


:xf.wink:
 
0
•••
Of course, you have no problem with a marxist collecting millions of dollars for endorsing a company that pay it's workers $15 a week.

Nike doesn't care about Kapernick's social cause or his politics. They're using him to sell shoes. He's doesn't care how much people are paid because he's making more than he made playing football.

If you think he can do more good with the money than the people laboring to make the shoes, your wrong. I doubt Kapernick cares about anything but fame.



I remember watching a 60 Minutes episode years ago, some college kids were protesting how much some kids were getting paid making stuff. They were actually successful in getting it shut down. One of the workers that was affected, went back to prostitution.

I myself think they don't get paid enough, people getting taking advantage of, still do. But it's about perspective. I've seen people post in this forum they could live a good life just making $200 a month. I spend more on food alone. See the picture above, looks like adults, not kids. So then I'm thinking, if there was a better job out there, wouldn't they be doing that, instead of making those shoes?

Also, your boy Trump is still taking advantage of that cheap labor. You going to hold him to the same standards? He got that tax cut for himself and his buddies, didn't bring the manufacturing of Trump products to the U.S.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Of course, you have no problem with a marxist collecting millions of dollars for endorsing a company that pay it's workers $15 a week.

Nike doesn't care about Kapernick's social cause or his politics. They're using him to sell shoes. He's doesn't care how much people are paid because he's making more than he made playing football.

If you think he can do more good with the money than the people laboring to make the shoes, your wrong. I doubt Kapernick cares about anything but fame.

First off, you can't read:

"I myself think they don't get paid enough, people getting taking advantage of, still do."

Then, you didn't tackle any of the points brought up, you just got emotional.

I didn't even mention Kap.
 
0
•••
Anyone else notice how all of these administration op-ed denials sound like the sycophantic cries of North Korean officials under a thin skinned egomaniac dictator...
 
1
•••
soft crying..

"I myself think they don't get paid enough, people getting taking advantage of, still do."

No thoughts on the obvious hypocrisy of Kaepernick, an open marxist, taking millions while laborers can't even afford the shoes he's promoting?

Then, you didn't tackle any of the points brought up, you just got emotional.

Ahh.. I think I made my perspective clear.

I didn't even mention Kap.
My point.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Anyone else notice how all of these administration op-ed denials sound like the sycophantic cries of North Korean officials under a thin skinned egomaniac dictator...

No.
 
2
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Last edited:
2
•••
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back