Unstoppable Domains โ€” Expired Auctions
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
17
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
1
•••
George Carlin was the one comedian that always railed against the government, laws, rules and people who were dumb.

Something like Will Rogers was back in the day.
 
2
•••
"Why is it that only whites can be racists?"

Excellent article on your blog... Dawg
 
2
•••
2
•••
1
•••
Incarceration_rates_worldwide.gif
 
1
•••
1
•••
1
•••
2
•••
#HotterThanMaddow #CrazierThanMaddow
 
0
•••
Are you saying that you think a scripted opinion piece performed by a Russian owned and funded "news" program doing a hatchet job on anyone should be accepted at face value as proof of anything?

They certainly can't be as bad as MSNBC
 
2
•••
They certainly can't be as bad as MSNBC

Sure they can. I'll bet with a little effort they could be just like Fox.
 
1
•••
Sure they can. I'll bet with a little effort they could be just like Fox.

Only North Korea media can beat MSNBC for Bull$hit News
 
2
•••
Only North Korea media can beat MSNBC for Bull$hit News

And just barely at that!

FOX....talk trash about them all you will, but they trounce all other cable news in every demographic.
 
2
•••
2
•••
#TalkAmongstYourselves
 
1
•••
"Are you saying that you think a scripted opinion piece performed by a Russian owned and funded "news" program doing a hatchet job on anyone should be accepted at face value as proof of anything?"

No opinion piece is "proof" of anything. For that I use wikipedia and any non-opinionated debunking websites that suit my worldview.

It is opinion and that is it. Shouldnt such a "Russian owned and funded" network be pro "liberal media " since we know they are all commies anyway?
 
1
•••
"Are you saying that you think a scripted opinion piece performed by a Russian owned and funded "news" program doing a hatchet job on anyone should be accepted at face value as proof of anything?"

No opinion piece is "proof" of anything. For that I use wikipedia and any non-opinionated debunking websites that suit my worldview.

Glad to hear that. For a minute there I thought you wanted me to take your title as a fact, proven by the opinion piece.

"
It is opinion and that is it. Shouldnt such a "Russian owned and funded" network be pro "liberal media " since we know they are all commies anyway?

If what you are asking is shouldn't people expect a communist TV network be pro liberal media? Not unless you change history.
 
1
•••
So you think Russia is a communist country ,or that RT is communist??Or that any media that is owned or partly owned by Russian companies destroys all merit behind any information or opinions expressed from such media sources. Do you think there is some kind of communist conspiracy or just anti everything that is Russian? BTW , RT is not state run if that is what you are getting at.


The main fact is democrat Rachel Madow blames "truthers" for boston bombing. That is a fact, she blamed so called "truthers" for the boston bombing. That is it, maybe you think she is right, maybe you think she is wrong , both would be opinon. Since most of the information around the bombing is top secret and not for the public , this opinon (of Mrs. Madow) is a theory and not fact- even though it is broatcast on MSN (who backs on owns them?).
 
1
•••
0
•••
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back