- Impact
- 52
With the obvious heat around the geo sector of .TV names it seems to me, based on common logic, that many cities with populations between 50 and 100 K ,that are growing and have lots of realestate and commerce development are they way to go as far as investing. While the top tier names will continue to skyrocket IMO, I think it safe to say that these smaller cities will still be somewhat valuable assets, especially when TV does become more established over the net.
I'm curious what others think on this topic? Don't smaller city names have an inherent value to them? If and when the bigger cities go for xxxxx isn't it conceivable that cities with 50 to 75 K might fetch mid to high xxx even low xxxx, especially from the realestate industry?
I'm curious what others think on this topic? Don't smaller city names have an inherent value to them? If and when the bigger cities go for xxxxx isn't it conceivable that cities with 50 to 75 K might fetch mid to high xxx even low xxxx, especially from the realestate industry?






