Selection criteria for Sedo's Premium Auction

[Embrand]

I wonder how Sedo selects domains for their Premium/GreatDomains Auction. I know it is their right to approve or reject domains, but still...

They rejected a domain of mine - based on the quality criteria - which Estibot values at $20,000 and Afternic more than double that. But the current auction has names such as interactif.net (reg fee at Estibot) and mxb.info (no offense if the owners are NP'ers).

Anyway, I guess all eyes are on pasta.com this time around :hehe:

 

[wot]

I wonder how Sedo selects domains for their Premium/GreatDomains Auction. I know it is their right to approve or reject domains, but still...

They rejected a domain of mine - based on the quality criteria - which Estibot values at $20,000 and Afternic more than double that. But the current auction has names such as interactif.net (reg fee at Estibot) and mxb.info (no offense if the owners are NP'ers).

Anyway, I guess all eyes are on pasta.com this time around :hehe:

I think they must use the same selection procedure that produces some of the gems we see at Moniker auctions. :wave:

 

[Embrand]

I think they must use the same selection procedure that produces some of the gems we see at Moniker auctions. :wave:

Yeah... Maybe they don't like earning good commissions.

 

[.tv]

Yeah... Maybe they don't like earning good commissions.

I think most of the craps listed in the premium section are owned by sedo staffs.

They have rejected all my submissions, even 1 letter domain names.