RWAs.com to beat NFTs.com

[radarcrypto]

Couple of years ago I foresaw a 8 figure sale for NFTs.com
https://www.namepros.com/threads/2022-most-expensive-domains-wanna-bet.1262452/

Today I just discovered that RWAs.com is also for sale (have been checking the site for the past year regularly)

RWAs (Real-World Assets) are probably the biggest thing that will happen to the financial world in the next years, basically putting every single asset onchain

I have no idea how much the owner wants but this will be probably the most important domain in the market for the next future and I will be not surprised if it beats any previous record

Have a good summer domainers!

 

[Future Sensors]

Most domainers underestimate what a "train" in crypto looks like.... It is massive, comes fast and is like nothing ever witnessed. Prepare accordingly....

Sure.

You have to be careful for crypto fraud and scams, though. People have lost billions. Here's the top 10.

https://techreport.com/statistics/crypto/biggest-crypto-scams/

 

[Internet.Domains]

Sure.

You have to be careful for crypto fraud and scams, though. People have lost billions. Here's the top 10.

https://techreport.com/statistics/crypto/biggest-crypto-scams/

Absolutely ... Wherever the sentiment and momentum goes in crypto, the scammers are already there.... Beware and enjoy the journey!....imo

 

[mrcurly]

Hundreds of Millions in RWAs to Power New Era of XRP Ledger, Says Ripple​

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cr...power-new-era-of-xrp-ledger-says-ripple&amp=1

 

[Internet.Domains]

Chainlink has been building a RWA infrastructure for a long time. For those looking for solid information

https://blog.chain.link/real-world-assets-rwas-explained/

 

[MKA]

Hate is a strong word....

Hate is a good word, because all you're doing is cajoling.

lets clear a few things up.

RWA - Real World Asset(s)

RWA is not NFT.... RWA's consist of both fungible & Non-Fungible tokens.... It's a case by case basis.

This explains zilch.

How is a RWA different from an NFT? Is it not on a Smart Contract? And how is a real world asset supposed to be fungible? You can't copy-paste your car.

Do you even know what it is, or are you coming up with this as you go along?

Of course this whole subject is going through the early stages of debate & regulation. The movement is dynamic, so stay tuned and open minded...imo

You have to define what it is first.

 

[Internet.Domains]

Hate is a good word, because all you're doing is cajoling.


This explains zilch.

How is a RWA different from an NFT? Is it not on a Smart Contract? And how is a real world asset supposed to be fungible? You can't copy-paste your car.

Do you even know what it is, or are you coming up with this as you go along?


You have to define what it is first.

I can tell you are having a hard time understanding my position and opinion based on my many years participatibg in the crypto biz.... I would offer some advice, but you don't seem too open to it, at this time.... If that changes, I would more than happy to answer any questions and concerns you have regarding all things crypto.... Best to ya!

 

[mrcurly]

I can tell you are having a hard time understanding my position and opinion based on my many years participatibg in the crypto biz.... I would offer some advice, but you don't seem too open to it, at this time.... If that changes, I would more than happy to answer any questions and concerns you have regarding all things crypto.... Best to ya!

I bet he doesn't even have any investment in here.....naysayer as usual

 

[Future Sensors]

I bet he doesn't even have any investment in here.....naysayer as usual

Are you saying here indirectly that you are only interested in the opinions that suit you?

 

[mrcurly]

Are you saying here indirectly that you are only interested in the opinions that suit you?

yes opinions that suit RWAs thread

 

[mrcurly]

who are you btw? a newbie ?

 

[Future Sensors]

yes opinions that suit RWAs thread

These do not always have to support your position, while they can still be very informative and can serve as a basis for whether or not to go along with this domain investing trend.

 

[Future Sensors]

who are you btw? a newbie ?

Ah, you're going the non-substantive route now.

 

[Internet.Domains]

Being a veteran in the domain & crypto space, I am in a unique position to have years of people personally attacking me for having an open mind and openness to discussing multiple narratives, as new information is always developing.... What just happened here, with personal attacks, is NOT unusual, however, it is unfortunate for those willing to learn something new.... I get it, lots of passion around both crypto & domains.... but let's discuss, without attack. Let's disagree, with out attack.... and if we agree, and it works out, boom ... We hit together! There's nothing better!

 

[Andreas B.]

In terms of branding there's a huge difference between "brand" and "brand.com," and it's definitely worth pointing out when we're talking about nft.com and nfts.com.

"NFT:s' website" does not translate to nfts.com the way "Target's website" translates to target.com.


It absolutely does. Grammar is extremely important for the sake of appearances, and deviations are seen as unprofessional.


By that line of reasoning the .com should be worth less, right?

Anyway, people are drawn to what seems official. I've had people asking me if they should register their domain with whois.com because they thought it was more official, even though it's a non-accredited reseller. Similarly, a lot of new registrants go with domain.com for the same reason.


nft.com only has advantages over nfts.com.

• It's shorter, meaning that it's easier to remember for people unfamiliar with the abbreviation, and more flexible when it comes to scaling up the domain for ads and billboards.
• It's far more universal (it's not limited to a marketplace for domains, e.g. apple.com vs apples.com).
• It seems more official (it's a proper abbreviation, and it's only three letters like bmw.com, cat.com, ibm.com, wbd.com)

Personal preferences do not reflect value.


The problem is that these domains sold at different times, to different people. Value isn't a constant.

In early 2021, NFT:s weren't promoted to the same degree they were in the later half of 2022 where you'd see them everywhere.


Neither have I. But I'm making a point. OpenSea cornered the market, so the prospects of growth for either nft.com and nfts.com are not looking too good.

But like you said, the hype for NFT:s are dead. There are a few stragglers who don't want to sober up to the grim reality that they've lost all their money, and a few grifters that still prey on said stragglers, but that's it.

There are domainers / developers that register using whois.com or domain.com, to look more 'official'??!


Sry
You're telling me whole new hacks I didn't know...

I'd say NFT is the one domain that is a bit limited, in my eyes,
but don't want to brag about the domain, as it is (of course) a great domain,
no matter what.


Btw, "personal preference does not reflect value actually" speaks for me

 

[bmugford]

I bet he doesn't even have any investment in here.....naysayer as usual

This logic doesn't really make sense.

Just because someone does or doesn't invest in something doesn't make them inherently right or wrong.

Why would someone invest in something they don't believe in?

Brad

 

[Jannes]

Domaining is at base a highly competitive field, so if you think that some are just naysayers with regards to crypto projects or whatever, it means less competition for you.

 

[mrcurly]

This logic doesn't really make sense.

Just because someone does or doesn't invest in something doesn't make them inherently right or wrong.

Why would someone invest in something they don't believe in?

Brad

so he/she is just here to be negative ? Why?

 

[bmugford]

so he/she is just here to be negative ? Why?

Well, that is how an open discussion works.

Otherwise, you just have an echo chamber.

Often times "naysayers" and "haters" know more about a field that many proponents do.

Just because someone invests doesn't give them unique knowledge or insight that can't exist as a non-investor.

There are plenty of domain investors that don't know much about domains. Just because you are an investor doesn't mean much.

Same in crypto, or any other investment.

Brad

 

[Future Sensors]

This would be a very boring forum if everyone agreed with each other, curly. Opinions are allowed to conflict respectfully and substantively, we all learn from that. The best domainers remain open to good arguments, by the way.

 

[Internet.Domains]

For those paying attention... Larry Fink of Blackrock loves RWAs.. He has been seen with Sergey & Schmidt from Chainlink on multiple occasions... Chainlink, and many crypto users, has adopted the term "RWA" to describe what Larry mentions below....