RWAs.com to beat NFTs.com

[radarcrypto]

Couple of years ago I foresaw a 8 figure sale for NFTs.com
https://www.namepros.com/threads/2022-most-expensive-domains-wanna-bet.1262452/

Today I just discovered that RWAs.com is also for sale (have been checking the site for the past year regularly)

RWAs (Real-World Assets) are probably the biggest thing that will happen to the financial world in the next years, basically putting every single asset onchain

I have no idea how much the owner wants but this will be probably the most important domain in the market for the next future and I will be not surprised if it beats any previous record

Have a good summer domainers!

 

[End User King]

Thanks

 

[radarcrypto]

rwascom will never sell for 7 or 8 fig. but it's important to have dreams

Depends on who the the buyer and the seller are

Boston Consulting Group wrote a detailed report on RWAs

https://web-assets.bcg.com/1e/a2/5b5f2b7e42dfad2cb3113a291222/on-chain-asset-tokenization.pdf

They forecast a market size of around $16 trillion by 2030, and in the best scenario $68 trillion

In that case a 9 figure might even be possible...becoming RWAs the most important asset/tech in the world

Real good domains are hard to get, the guy that sold AI.com for I think 10M left on the table at least 20 additional millions imo

We say domains are digital address, our digital identit and companies digital identities are becoming more important than the IRL ones

It's time for domainers to price their domain at the right level

Stop dreaming it, do it...

 

[MKA]

Couple of years ago I foresaw a 8 figure sale for NFTs.com
https://www.namepros.com/threads/2022-most-expensive-domains-wanna-bet.1262452/

Looks like you predicted one out of four.

Today I just discovered that RWAs.com is also for sale (have been checking the site for the past year regularly)

RWAs (Real-World Assets) are probably the biggest thing that will happen to the financial world in the next years, basically putting every single asset onchain

I have no idea how much the owner wants but this will be probably the most important domain in the market for the next future and I will be not surprised if it beats any previous record

Have a good summer domainers!

Are you sure you're not using this to advertise one of your domains?

I would not pay $100 for this domain.

 

[MKA]

Every market has a pendelum.

Still holding out for the return of tulip mania?

The NFT trend has swung the opposite direction, but that does NOT mean it's over.

It does. The only reason people were driven to the market was because of the promise of convenient financial gains. Now when most have sobered up to the bullshit with rug pulls and whatnot they're not coming back.

.. some people will always collect blockchain relics, just like some collect baseball cards and some collect domains.....imo

The NFT market died quicker than it took off. It's not that people lost interest in it. If that was the case it would've been a slow death.

 

[Andreas B.]

How can someone (still) think that NFT is superior to NFTs, even though the 4 digit domain sold for $15 mio.

RWA is a real thing, but:
Real things always take much more time than art (NFTs).


So...

We are too early.

First crypto has to be adopted by all big players, not just for speculation (BTC), but for some sort of utility,
then come RWA.

 

[MKA]

How can someone (still) think that NFT is superior to NFTs, even though the 4 digit domain sold for $15 mio.

Because the sales of nft.com and nfts.com took place at different times.

Normally abbreviations aren't pluralized, and three letter .com:s are far more valuable than four letter .com:s.

The guy who bought nfts.com at the height of the hype made the worst mistake of his life. I doubt he could make back 1% of what he spent on it.

RWA is a real thing, but:
Real things always take much more time than art (NFTs).

So...

We are too early.

First crypto has to be adopted by all big players, not just for speculation (BTC), but for some sort of utility,
then come RWA.

You're not too early, you're too late.

NFT:s has been nothing but market manipulation and scams, it expended the last of its goodwill a long time ago.

 

[radarcrypto]

If you are talking about PFPs etc it was obvious Bored Apes etc were just a marketing thing and Beeple sale will be remembered like one of the silliest thing ever

What happened before that was the real thing and historic art via NFTs ll have lot of value

NFTs in the end are just a way to name digital assets and the tech behind them that allows their transfer and interractions

I do believe blockchain will be the tech behind every transactions in the future so all names/abbreviations around this tech ll gain value imo

and for sure real world assets will outperform digital assets in terms of volumes

anyway let see...maybe instead of all this we get back to barter...

 

[Internet.Domains]

Still holding out for the return of tulip mania?


It does. The only reason people were driven to the market was because of the promise of convenient financial gains. Now when most have sobered up to the bullshit with rug pulls and whatnot they're not coming back.


The NFT market died quicker than it took off. It's not that people lost interest in it. If that was the case it would've been a slow death.

Of course rugs and market manipulation are going to be in the early cycles of digital ownership. Although, when the dust settles there is real tech and innovation behind the scenes. Don't let the false narratives and herd of sheep blind the eyes...imo

 

[mrcurly]

I've started a niche thread on this for people to showcase RWAs domains

https://www.namepros.com/threads/rw...discussion-and-showcase.1332570/#post-9231028

 

[mrcurly]

Any value in SatsHunter.com and RWAs.xyz?

RWAs.xyz is awesome imo

 

[mrcurly]

The 'RWAs' era has begun, load up people

https://medium.com/ripplexdev/rippl...th-real-world-asset-tokenization-68921406100a

 

[MKA]

If you are talking about PFPs etc it was obvious Bored Apes etc were just a marketing thing and Beeple sale will be remembered like one of the silliest thing ever

Of course rugs and market manipulation are going to be in the early cycles of digital ownership.

Yes it was obvious, which is why millions of people were scammed....

And don't get me wrong. The point isn't that people were scammed. The point is that they're not coming back to get scammed again.

What happened before that was the real thing and historic art via NFTs ll have lot of value

What is an "NFT 2" and what do they sell for?

NFTs in the end are just a way to name digital assets and the tech behind them that allows their transfer and interractions

It's a Smart Contract with a link to a server hosting an image, or whatever the token is. Don't use abstract terms like "assets" and "tech" to describe it.

I do believe blockchain will be the tech behind every transactions in the future so all names/abbreviations around this tech ll gain value imo

The problem is that you believe it because you want to believe it, not because you have a reason to.

anyway let see...maybe instead of all this we get back to barter...

Barter for what? Do you own the domain or not?

Also, the topic of NFT:s is highly relevant to the topic of this particular kind of NFT you're presenting.

Although, when the dust settles there is real tech and innovation behind the scenes.

Why do you guys keep using buzzwords like "tech and innovation?" You're talking like you're trying to sell something that you don't understand. If you can motivate why you think there's potential for growth then do it, but don't tell me that there's magic going on behind the curtain.

Don't let the false narratives and herd of sheep blind the eyes...imo

Let me give you a tip as well: If you don't understand something, don't invest in it.

 

[Internet.Domains]

Yes it was obvious, which is why millions of people were scammed....

And don't get me wrong. The point isn't that people were scammed. The point is that they're not coming back to get scammed again.


What is an "NFT 2" and what do they sell for?


It's a Smart Contract with a link to a server hosting an image, or whatever the token is. Don't use abstract terms like "assets" and "tech" to describe it.


The problem is that you believe it because you want to believe it, not because you have a reason to.


Barter for what? Do you own the domain or not?

Also, the topic of NFT:s is highly relevant to the topic of this particular kind of NFT you're presenting.


Why do you guys keep using buzzwords like "tech and innovation?" You're talking like you're trying to sell something that you don't understand. If you can motivate why you think there's potential for growth then do it, but don't tell me that there's magic going on behind the curtain.


Let me give you a tip as well: If you don't understand something, don't invest in it.

I agree with your bold tip at closing -
"If you don't understand something, don't invest in it"

Blockchain technology, or crypto, and digital assets is definitely NOT for those that have little to no understanding of the underlying technology.... Just like the early days of the internet when dot coms were bringing in IPO money with nothing more than a domain and no earnings, tech will always prosper regardless of sentiment... The internet got through the rugs with scammer websites, blockchain will follow a similar trajectory...imo... Cheers

 

[Andreas B.]

Because the sales of nft.com and nfts.com took place at different times.

Normally abbreviations aren't pluralized, and three letter .com:s are far more valuable than four letter .com:s.

The guy who bought nfts.com at the height of the hype made the worst mistake of his life. I doubt he could make back 1% of what he spent on it.


You're not too early, you're too late.

NFT:s has been nothing but market manipulation and scams, it expended the last of its goodwill a long time ago.

Sure, he bought at the trend peak, so that for timing...

Don't agree on the argumentation of 3 vs 4 letters though.


No one says NFT, unless he is talking about technology level.

The art itself refers to NFTs,
and people always say NFTs.


We had this discussion one year ago or so, and people had different opinions on that.
And I respect that.

But unless my memory does not fool me, a majority hold NFTs for the superior (domain) name compared to NFT,
because it sounds better.


NFTs can be a great commercial marketplace,
NFT .com ... not really.

 

[mrcurly]

Sure, he bought at the trend peak, so that for timing...

Don't agree on the argumentation of 3 vs 4 letters though.


No one says NFT, unless he is talking about technology level.

The art itself refers to NFTs,
and people always say NFTs.


We had this discussion one year ago or so, and people had different opinions on that.
And I respect that.

But unless my memory does not fool me, a majority hold NFTs for the superior (domain) name compared to NFT,
because it sounds better.


NFTs can be a great commercial marketplace,
NFT .com ... not really.

so RWAs.com is better than RWA.com

 

[Andreas B.]

so RWAs.com is better than RWA.com

Maybe

For NFTs it is more or less clear (at least for me; although everybody could live with the singular as well, ... lol)

RWA is new,
if it'll become a thing, I guess RWAs .com will serve the website owner better as well.

 

[Andreas B.]

So yeah, RWAs .com is for sale...

 

[mrcurly]

So yeah, RWAs .com is for sale...

Show attachment 261070

wow

 

[BRDavid08]

I have RWAsMarket.com

 

[mrcurly]

Sale

RWALayer.com
$8,000