Please Sign this petition to help Mr Rob Monster

[barybadrinath]

There has been continuous attempts of character assassination and paid witch hunt towards Epik Registrar and Its CEO Mr Rob Montser.
I request all respected domainers all around the globe to come and play their part by signing and sharing this petition to help one of ours i.e Mr Rob Monster.

If We domainers wont stand against these corrupt practices of paid journalists, no one else will. Today its Mr Rob, tomorrow it will be you.

http://chng.it/g9mqK4Cy - Link to petition

I also request everyone to spread out the word and to share it on your respective social media timelines.

Also please raise your voice here --

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:...roposal_to_change_the_lead_paragraph_for_Epik

 

[DaveX]

Certainly, if it meets the requirements I've laid out about the kinds of sourcing that Wikipedia accepts. This is something I've said again and again. I'm beginning to feel like a broken record, practically begging people to provide me with usable positive sources on Epik. People are making claims like they've provided this sourcing, but they haven't. I am sorry if I sound frustrated, it's because I am.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251615221199880193

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251611917577269248

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251612033012961280

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251612191134044172

Thanks for repeating that. It's why I assumed you to be a fair person.

 

[DaveX]

Certainly, if it meets the requirements I've laid out about the kinds of sourcing that Wikipedia accepts. This is something I've said again and again. I'm beginning to feel like a broken record, practically begging people to provide me with usable positive sources on Epik. People are making claims like they've provided this sourcing, but they haven't. I am sorry if I sound frustrated, it's because I am.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251615221199880193

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251611917577269248

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251612033012961280

https://twitter.com/x/status/1251612191134044172

Perhaps you could get unprecendented access to Rob Monster and put together a Wikipedia contribution that is beyond thorough!

 

[Grilled]

Perhaps you could get unprecendented access to Rob Monster and put together a Wikipedia contribution that is beyond thorough!

Why in the world would she want to subject herself to such after what rob and epik have subjected her to?

I tried to disengage. But let's be fair. Apologies are in order.

 

[DaveX]

@Molly White I truly appreciate you coming here in person to make your position clear. I have respect for you and I haven't even met you. I feel confident that you will be fair in assessing the edits that Epik suggests.

 

[DaveX]

Why in the world would she want to subject herself to such after what rob and epik have subjected her to?

Because she is good people. She can understand that the article in and of itself, perhaps put Epik on the defensive.

I would say a fresh start is in order. I think Molly would agree. (and i haven't even met her.)

 

[barybadrinath]

@Molly White - Madam I am not able to find your supportive post regarding banning of my account from wikipedia for 2 years and I am unable to post anything in Talk Section.

For starting You may have a look at these below points -


2) https://www.namepros.com/threads/if...scrow-you-are-wasting-time-and-money.1119508/

3) https://www.trustpilot.com/review/epik.com


Also you shall think to remove " known for " section immediately/

 

[Rob Monster]

@Molly White -

See here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynadot

They are another ICANN-accredited registrar of comparable size to Epik. They have also had controversy - what some deemed newsworthy. That event does not define them.

Our decision to be a registrar for a small number of sites that allow civil liberty to be exercised is not what defines Epik Holdings Inc as a company nor does it define Epik as registrar or me personally.

And yet, your articles, and they are yours by your own admission, paint a vile picture assembled from sources that launched a coordinated attack of media character assassination.

If the goal was to disable or remove Epik, you failed horribly. Now the question is whether your failure to destroy Epik is going to accelerate the collapse of Wikipedia.

This has nothing to do with your gender or sexual orientation. I could care less. This is entirely about your persistent engagement in willful character assassination with contempt.

The damages are tolling. I suggest you hire an attorney.

 

[DaveX]

@Molly White -

See here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynadot

They are another ICANN-accredited registrar of comparable size to Epik. They have also had controversy - what some deemed newsworthy. That event does not define them.

Our decision to be a registrar for a small number of sites that allow civil liberty to be exercised is not what defines Epik Holdings Inc as a company nor does it define Epik as registrar or me personally.

And yet, your articles, and they are yours by your own admission, paint a vile picture assembled from sources that launched a coordinated attack of media character assassination.

If the goal was to disable or remove Epik, you failed horribly. Now the question is whether your failure to destroy Epik is going to accelerate the collapse of Wikipedia.

This has nothing to do with your gender or sexual orientation. I could care less. This is entirely about your persistent engagement in willful character assassination with contempt.

The damages are tolling. I suggest you hire an attorney.

Wow. And I thought this could be fixed with some factual editing. Oh well. @Rob Monster should you not consider Molly's invitation to clean up the article?

 

[Grilled]

I would say a fresh start is in order.

Hopefully without bias, manipulation, or advertising.

 

[Grilled]

The damages are tolling. I suggest you hire an attorney.

I suggest you hire an attorney.

 

[DaveX]

Hopefully without bias, manipulation, or advertising.

Molly has earned her ability to be fair and to ensure the standards of Wikipedia are met.

She has also, and I respect her for it, stated that she is not a domain industry expert.

 

[Molly White]

And yet, your articles, and they are yours by your own admission

Where did I say it was my article? Was it this post, maybe? https://www.namepros.com/threads/pl...lp-mr-rob-monster.1186329/page-5#post-7729919

The damages are tolling. I suggest you hire an attorney.

I do not appreciate being threatened. I will admit to being curious to what it is you plan to sue me for—as members of your own forum as well as myself have already pointed out, defamation requires the statements to be false. I have repeatedly invited you and others to point out to me specifically which statements are not supported by citations, and that invitation remains open. No one has taken me up on it yet.

 

[DaveX]

Any company, when threatened with bad publicity, will take a hardline stance. Just ask GoDaddy.

Epik (Rob Monster) is no different. Except that he is directly accessible to discuss solutions.

If I know Rob, he is more than willing to put this behind so long as he is allowed the same freedom as others in the creation and maintenance of the Wikipedia article.

 

[Grilled]

I do not appreciate being threatened.

I guess that's the culture of epik? To threaten you if they can't manipulate you?

They seem to have a pattern of that, as I mentioned their recent issues with WIPO.

This email does not fully address the elements of the Policy or contain the required certification (see paragraph 5(c)(viii) of the Rules). Moreover, it makes a number of needless derogatory remarks (and threats) about the UDRP and the Center. Despite this, the Panel has taken into account parts of the email relevant to this proceeding in making its decision.

Source: https://domaingang.com/domain-law/bc30-com-udrp-what-not-to-do-when-negotiating-a-domain-sale/

 

[barybadrinath]

Where did I say it was my article? Was it this post, maybe? https://www.namepros.com/threads/pl...lp-mr-rob-monster.1186329/page-5#post-7729919



I do not appreciate being threatened. I will admit to being curious to what it is you plan to sue me for—as members of your own forum as well as myself have already pointed out, defamation requires the statements to be false. I have repeatedly invited you and others to point out to me specifically which statements are not supported by citations, and that invitation remains open. No one has taken me up on it yet.

we are not able to post anything on talk page / perhaps blocked by you

 

[DaveX]

I guess that's the culture of epik?

They seem to have a pattern of that, as I mentioned their recent issues with WIPO.

https://domaingang.com/domain-law/bc30-com-udrp-what-not-to-do-when-negotiating-a-domain-sale/

You should stop.

Molly clearly is trying to educate us about Wikipedia protocol. She is also clearly trying to convey that she would work to enrich the entry.

 

[Grilled]

You should stop.

Molly clearly is trying to educate us about Wikipedia protocol. She is also clearly trying to convey that she would work to enrich the entry.

Thanks, I will stop. Signing off for a bit, for sure, after this post.

I'll only refer you to the above post from rob, to which molly responded, that she doesn't appreciate being threatened.

Not sure why you don't wan't to acknowledge any threats, Your bias is starting to show.

 

[DaveX]

Thanks, I will stop. Signing off for a bit, for sure, after this post.

I'll only refer you to the above post from rob, to which molly responded, that she doesn't appreciate being threatened.

Not sure why you don't wan't to acknowledge any threats, Your bias is starting to show.

I promise I have no bias. Enjoy the breather. I appreciate good people. That includes Rob and Molly....and you sir!

"If you're happy and you know it clap your hands..." (I'm clapping)

 

[frank-germany]

where is the vomitting emojiiiiii?

 

[DaveX]

where is the vomitting emojiiiiii?

right here...