Please Sign this petition to help Mr Rob Monster

[barybadrinath]

There has been continuous attempts of character assassination and paid witch hunt towards Epik Registrar and Its CEO Mr Rob Montser.
I request all respected domainers all around the globe to come and play their part by signing and sharing this petition to help one of ours i.e Mr Rob Monster.

If We domainers wont stand against these corrupt practices of paid journalists, no one else will. Today its Mr Rob, tomorrow it will be you.

http://chng.it/g9mqK4Cy - Link to petition

I also request everyone to spread out the word and to share it on your respective social media timelines.

Also please raise your voice here --

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:...roposal_to_change_the_lead_paragraph_for_Epik

 

[Rob Monster]

@Rob Monster has used controversy, such as conspiracy theories, denials of mass murder, neo-nazi content, etc, etc, for what appears to have been to gain media attention and promote Epik. Now it has come back to bite him in the a$$. Just read this thread:

https://www.namepros.com/threads/whats-going-on-with-epik-and-rob-monster.1128748/

Whoever signs your petition is either a newbie or ignorant.

For the record, I actually have nothing to do with the petition. It was the initiative of a concerned citizen written in their own language. I applaud the courageous and selfless act of opposing mob rule.

The people at Wikipedia can choose to stand down, but like Pharaoh, they stand resolved with hardened hearts, determined to preserve an article that propagates a false characterization.

It is entirely possible that their resolve will cost them dearly before everything is said and done. If they were wise, they would choose an easier target to defame.

 

[barybadrinath]

For the record, I actually have nothing to do with the petition. It was the initiative of a concerned citizen written in their own language. I applaud the courageous and selfless act of opposing mob rule.

The people at Wikipedia can choose to stand down, but like Pharaoh, they stand resolved with hardened hearts, determined to preserve an article that propagates a false characterization.

It is entirely possible that their resolve will cost them dearly before everything is said and done. If they were wise, they would choose an easier target to defame.

Yes i am the one who started it and all of my comments are also mine responsibilty and no one else's

 

[bmugford]

The people at Wikipedia can choose to stand down, but like Pharaoh, they stand resolved with hardened hearts, determined to preserve an article that propagates a false characterization.

It is entirely possible that their resolve will cost them dearly before everything is said and done. If they were wise, they would choose an easier target to defame.

Just for reference, what in the article is factually untrue?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epik_(domain_registrar)

Epik is an ICANN-accredited domain registrar and web hosting company[1] known for providing services to websites that host far-right, Neo-Nazi, and other extremist content as well as those that sell illegal drugs and counterfeit medications.[8] It has been described by Vice as "a safehaven for the extreme right" because of its willingness to host websites that have been shut down by other web hosts.[5]

There are multiple citations listed.

If anything, this article is much more damaging than anything on Wikipedia -
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rob-monster-epik-gab-neo-nazi_n_5c17bb29e4b05d7e5d846f72

Brad

 

[Nametree]

Sir this is libel--
Show attachment 151561


and so is this--

Show attachment 151562

Libel:

a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.

 

[NickB]

For the record, I actually have nothing to do with the petition. It was the initiative of a concerned citizen written in their own language. I applaud the courageous and selfless act of opposing mob rule.

The people at Wikipedia can choose to stand down, but like Pharaoh, they stand resolved with hardened hearts, determined to preserve an article that propagates a false characterization.

It is entirely possible that their resolve will cost them dearly before everything is said and done. If they were wise, they would choose an easier target to defame.

so your condoning someone who is attacking a woman's reputation that works for an organisation that you are in disagreement with?

Your business is your business deal with it - do not go down this Donald Trump path.......

 

[barybadrinath]

so your condoning someone who is attacking a woman's reputation that works for an organisation that you are in disagreement with?

Your business is your business deal with it - do not go down this Donald Trump path.......

please dont start feminism activism and me too campaigns. when she does the wrong then she is editor but when she is questioned then she becomes female. what a level of hypocrisy is this. n by the way donald trump is usa president who has been elected democratically

 

[DaveX]

Based solely on my personal experience Wikipedia is Wackipedia.

The seasoned editors have big heads and are difficult to deal with. Even considering the challenges they face with vandalism.

I really don't like wikipedia and I think the fate of wikipedia ultimately will be the same as dmoz was.

Just my opinion. Wikipedia really sucks in my opinion.

 

[barybadrinath]

not saying anything , just posting an answer given by one of the ex admin of wikipedia==

Source - https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-way-to-bypass-a-Wikipedia-block

Also I am taking break for 2-3 days.

 

[NickB]

Based solely on my personal experience Wikipedia is Wackipedia.

The seasoned editors have big heads and are difficult to deal with. Even considering the challenges they face with vandalism.

I really don't like wikipedia and I don't think the fate of wikipedia ultimately will be the same as dmoz was.

Just my opinion. Wikipedia really sucks in my opinion.

So does that justify calling someone who works for them corrupt and posting their image without their consent on another website? I don't think it does.......

People's feeling towards Wikipedia are a separate issue to what the OP has done here
A business complaint being aired in public is a separate issue to this thread

 

[DaveX]

So does that justify calling someone who works for them corrupt and posting their image without their consent on another website? I don't think it does.......

People's feeling towards Wikipedia are a separate issue to what the OP has done here
A business complaint being aired in public is a separate issue to this thread

IMO, if a photo is public, it is public. If it was hacked and stolen that would be different.

 

[barybadrinath]

So does that justify calling someone who works for them corrupt and posting their image without their consent on another website? I don't think it does.......

People's feeling towards Wikipedia are a separate issue to what the OP has done here
A business complaint being aired in public is a separate issue to this thread

1) I have same right which she has in posting my photo publically here --

2) Now Ms Corrupt trying to lay feminist victim card --

 

[TCK]

when she does the wrong

What did she do wrong? You still haven't provided any proof of wrongdoing or quotes she or whoever made that are inaccurate. All you did was cast disparaging remarks.

 

[DaveX]

Epik is an ICANN-accredited domain registrar and web hosting company[1] known for providing services to websites that host far-right, Neo-Nazi, and other extremist content as well as those that sell illegal drugs and counterfeit medications.[8] It has been described by Vice as "a safehaven for the extreme right" because of its willingness to host websites that have been shut down by other web hosts.[5]

This is very bad. Very wrong. Completely biased.

Same could be published about other registrars....porn, etc. Try putting that shit on GoDaddy's wikipedia.

 

[bmugford]

What did she do wrong? You still haven't provided any proof of wrongdoing or quotes she or whoever made that are inaccurate. All you did was cast disparaging remarks.

Yes, as I posted earlier in this thread what is factually untrue? There are multiple citations listed.

Just because you don't like what it says, doesn't mean you can re-invent reality to your own liking.

Brad

 

[TCK]

Epik is an ICANN-accredited domain registrar and web hosting company[1] known for providing services to websites that host far-right, Neo-Nazi, and other extremist content as well as those that sell illegal drugs and counterfeit medications.[8] It has been described by Vice as "a safehaven for the extreme right" because of its willingness to host websites that have been shut down by other web hosts.[5]

This is very bad. Very wrong. Completely biased.

It may be wrong or biased in your eyes, but is it factually inaccurate?

 

[DaveX]

It may be wrong or biased in your eyes, but is it factually inaccurate?

Yes

 

[TCK]

Yes

Why is it factually inaccurate? Are you trying to say Epik didn't do those things?

 

[DaveX]

It may be wrong or biased in your eyes, but is it factually inaccurate?

The editor makes references to Neo Nazi, etc with no supporting documentation. Only links to those words within wikipedia.

 

[bmugford]

Yes

What fact(s) are wrong?

Brad

 

[TCK]

The editor makes references to Neo Nazi, etc with no supporting documentation. Only links to those words within wikipedia.

You can find supporting documentation all over the Internet, including domaining sites.