Octo Browser
Established Member
- Impact
- 0
Choosing the right software can prove challenging. It's not always clear where ads end and high-quality reviews from real users begin, so we're here to make it easier for you. Right now, you're in the Octo Browser thread, and it's obvious that we recommend using our browser.
However, we're also interested in making sure that your choice is backed by facts, not ads, and that you remain satisfied after purchasing a subscription. That's why we've prepared this comparison between Octo Browser and Dolphin{anty}, trying to make it as objective and useful as possible.
Would you like to try Octo Browser for free?
Use the promo code NAPEPROS to get a 4-day Base subscription for free. This offer is valid only for new users.Table of contents
- Dolphin{anty} at a glance
- Interface
- Fingerprint spoofing
- Bulk operations
- Automation
- Update Speed
- User Data Security
- Stability of Operation
- Pricing
- Summary
Dolphin{anty} at a glance
According to the developers, Dolphin{anty} is best suited for multi-accounting on Google, Facebook, and TikTok. It includes automation for managing ads and optimizing ad campaigns on Facebook. The automation service is not included in the basic pricing plans; it needs to be purchased separately for almost $100.For users without programming skills, Dolphin{anty} has added a graphical interface where you can create automation scenarios for social media. You'll have to think through the logic of your actions yourself, as the browser team doesn't provide ready-made templates.
Starting from the Base plan, Dolphin{anty} allows adding team members. Each of them will have one of four roles (administrator, team lead, buyer, or farmer) with different levels of access.
Profiles can be transferred not only to team members but also to other users of the browser. This functionality is used by farmers and affiliate marketers who buy and sell ready-made accounts on advertising platforms.
Dolphin{anty} has a free plan that can be used without time restrictions. With this plan, you can have up to 10 profiles. If you need more, there is an opportunity to purchase them without moving to the next subscription tier.
Dolphin's loyal users can earn by attracting new clients. Through the referral program, partners receive 15% of the first and all subsequent payments from each invited customer.
Let's compare Dolphin{anty} and Octo Browser in more detail based on key characteristics.
Interface
The appearance of all popular browsers doesn't differ that much: first, the user sees a table containing profile names, proxy information, tags, statuses, buttons to access more detailed settings, and, of course, buttons to launch profiles. Profiles can be sorted, customized, and subjected to mass actions.From the same screen you can access the rest of the browser functionality: detailed profile settings, proxy management, account settings, subscription management, etc.
The fundamental interface difference between Octo and Dolphin{anty} lies in their approach to UI design. In Dolphin{anty}, developers try to include as many settings as possible and make all menu elements highly customizable, while Octo Browser is guided by the principle "the simpler, the better".
Let's discuss the specific interface features that distinguish Octo and Dolphin{anty}.
| Octo Browser UI | Dolphin{anty} UI |
|---|---|
 All basic profile sorting options are available: by creation date, launch date, name, and tags. It's concise and convenient. There is a quick profile creation button. Each new profile will be created either with a randomized fingerprint or will follow a template. You can add profile icons. You can configure the starting pages for each profile individually. You can add an extension to a running browser instance, and it will become available when creating new profiles later. There's a videostream spoofing feature. Descriptions can only be viewed by clicking on profiles, they are not shown in the table. There are no profile statuses, only tags. You cannot easily add extensions from files or links directly from the browser, you need to use the Web Store in a launched profile, or use API or developer mode. Launch arguments cannot be used directly with the browser, they are available only through API. | Good customization options: you can adjust the width and size of columns, swap columns, delete unused ones, or add new ones. Any navigation parameter can be edited on the spot and sorted as needed. When creating a profile, you can choose presets for Google, Facebook, and TikTok that allow you to save the login and password and provide a set of predefined bookmarks. There's also a Crypto preset. It's possible to mass-create new profiles with a randomized fingerprint. There is separate functionality for installing and managing extensions. You can install them from different sources. Too many buttons, some of which lead to the website. There is no hierarchy between elements. If you use the free subscription, you will see a lot of ads. Only the columns of the profile management window can be customized. It is not possible to customize these elements in other windows. Itβs impossible to install an extension from a launched profile and save it in the extensions menu. |
Fingerprint spoofing
The key function of a multi-accounting browser, no matter the purpose you use it for, is fingerprint spoofing. The spoofing quality, the number of spoofed parameters, and how easily spoofing can be configured largely determine the overall quality of a multi-accounting browser.The basic profile settings in Octo Browser and Dolphin{anty} are more or less similar. However, the main difference lies in the details. In the case of Dolphin{anty}, there are noticeable drawbacks, such as the impossibility of configuring DNS and fonts.
| Fingerprint spoofing in Octo Browser | Fingerprint spoofing in Dolphin{anty} |
|---|---|
| You can choose from various OSs, such as Windows 10, 11, as well as the four latest versions of macOS. DNS settings are available. Audio hardware noise is available. Detailed fonts settings are available. All necessary ports are blocked by default with no detailed ports configuration. | You can block ports of your choice. Almost all spoofing is disabled by default. This means that profiles expose your real digital fingerprint data: screen resolution, Canvas, WebGL, media devices, etc. Linux is available, although choosing it may trigger anti-fraud systems if used on a Windows or macOS device. In general, Linux looks more suspicious to anti-fraud systems than more popular operating systems. Font substitution is not available. This is a serious drawback, as system fonts make it easy to discover a connection between profiles and determine that a given profile was created for Windows, and another for macOS. There is a "Turn off" button in the WebGL settings. Most likely, developers added this as a workaround for specific cases. It's better not to disable this setting. There is a "Do not track" checkbox in the settings. It's better to leave this option enabled by default. No Audio hardware noise. No DNS settings. Some settings for saving profile data are missing: for example, there is no Local Storage or browser history. Device name and MAC address are available in the profile settings. However, these settings have no significance for the digital fingerprint spoofing, as they cannot be obtained through the browser. No real spoofing is performed, and users are given a false sense of control due to irrelevant settings. |
Bulk operations
When working with multi-accounting, it's important that basic operations with browser profiles could be performed both individually and in bulk, which may save time for some users.In this regard, Octo Browser has all the essential bulk functions: tag management, adding proxies, and export, import, transfer, and deletion of profiles. Meanwhile, in Dolphin{anty}, profile export is missing, but there's an additional feature for bulk export of cookies and profile creation.
Octo Browser has a convenient feature for multi-accounting that Dolphin{anty} lacks, namely templates. Using templates, you can create your own sets of fingerprint settings, which saves time when creating identical or similar profiles. Templates also allow you to add proxies to profiles based on a proxy list.
In Dolphin{anty}, the number of presets is limited to Google, TikTok, Facebook, and Crypto, which significantly reduces the possibilities for bulk profile management.
Automation
In multi-accounting browsers, automation can be used to save time while performing routine actions, such as web scraping, preparing profiles for work, liking, etc. Octo Browser and Dolphin{anty} both support working with API in a similar manner allowing creating, deleting, and editing profiles, proxies, and tags, as well as launching profiles for automation using any browser automation framework.When using automation in Dolphin{anty}, there's a high risk of detection because this browser is not designed to counter automation detection; Octo is better suited for automation purposes.
A slight advantage of Dolphin{anty} is that it comes with a tool for creating custom automation scripts with a graphical interface. This is convenient for simple automation tasks if you are unsure how to properly write scripts.
Update Speed
Prompt kernel updates are crucial for multi-accounting browsers. This is necessary to blend in with the crowd of Chrome users who update first. To evaluate the update speed, we took publicly available information about the last 10 updates. We didn't consider minor deviations of 2-3 days, but if the difference was significant, we highlighted the multi-accounting browser with the better result.| Octo Browser | Dolphin{anty} | |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium 122 | February 22, 2024 | N/A |
| Chromium 121 | January 29, 2024 | January 26, 2024 |
| Chromium 120 | December 14, 2023 | December 14, 2023 |
| Chromium 119 | November 2, 2023 | November 2, 2023 |
| Chromium 118 | October 16, 2023 | October 16, 2023 |
| Chromium 117 | September 21, 2023 | October 5, 2023 |
| Chromium 116 | August 17, 2023 | August 22, 2023 |
| Chromium 115 | July 20, 2023 | N/A |
| Chromium 114 | June 5, 2023 | July 13, 2023 |
| Chromium 113 | May 23, 2023 | N/A |
User Data Security
Octo Browser reliably protects user data, which is stored on European cloud servers and encrypted using the AES standard. The data storage is organized in such a way that even in the unlikely event of a partial data leak, malicious actors still wonβt be able access user profiles.The situation with Dolphin{anty} is debatable. On one hand, in July 2022 there was a leak of 15% of all user profile data, indicating a questionable approach to user data protection, and similar situations occur with Dolphin{anty} with some regularity. On the other hand, lightning doesn't strike the same spot twice, and colleagues likely have done some work on fixing the previous mistakes. Ultimately, the decision about who they trust with their data security lies with the users.
Stability of Operation
To determine how stable a multi-accounting browser is, you need to use it for a considerable amount of time. While some developers, such as Dolphin{anty}, have public incident calendars, at the time of writing an incident occurred that wasn't listed on the calendar but will likely remain in users' memories.
To better understand a browserβs stability levels, it's recommended to look in its community chat: youβll find more information about browser issues there.
From February 2023 to February 2024, Octo Browser users experienced only one noticeable issue with a release, which occurred with Update 1.8; normal operation was restored within approximately one day.
Pricing
One of the key factors when choosing a multi-accounting browser is its cost, and it's discussed last in our evaluation. Why? In our opinion, the price is irrelevant if the browser doesn't perform its main function well. You can get any number of profiles for free, but if fingerprint spoofing doesn't work correctly, what's the point? All your efforts will be at risk if price is prioritized when choosing a multi-accounting browser. Therefore, we recommend focusing first on the quality of fingerprint spoofing, then on the convenience of the user interface, and only lastly on the subscription costs.Nevertheless, for many users, the subscription price might be a crucial factor, so we'll consider it too. For our comparison, we used standard prices, without promotional offers or long-term subscription discounts.
| Octo Browser | Dolphin{anty} | |
|---|---|---|
| Trial period | With a promo code | No |
| Free subscription | No | Yes, 10 profiles |
| Cost of one profile with the cheapest subscription | β¬2,9 | 0 |
| Cost of one profile with the Base subscription (100 profiles) | β¬0,79 | β¬0,82 |
| Cost of one profile with the most expensive subscription (1200 profiles) | β¬0,27 | β¬0,32 |
For its part, Dolphin{anty} offers the option to add team members for a price starting with the Base subscription, which can be convenient for small teams. However, the cost per profile will be significantly higher compared to Octo.
| Octo Browser | Dolphin{anty} | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of the cheapest team subscription for 3 team members | β¬169 (350 profiles) | β¬110 (100 profiles) |
| Cost of a profile with the cheapest team subscription for 3 team members | β¬0,48 | β¬1,1 |
| Cost of the most expensive team subscription for 8 team members * except Custom subscription | β¬329 (1200 profiles) | β¬463 (1000 profiles) |
| Cost of a profile with the most expensive team subscription for 8 team members * except Custom subscription | β¬0,27 | β¬0,46 |
Summary
Octo Browser offers more useful fingerprint spoofing settings, higher spoofing quality, more stable releases, and faster kernel updates. Octo's pricing options are more profitable, especially for medium and large teams.Dolphin{anty}'s strengths include a customizable interface, features for bulk actions, a separate feature for creating automation algorithms without coding, and a free version, which can be a boon for beginners.
Last edited:
