I think I'm probably going to end up missing out on them cause I don't understand it. It's a strange world
Prob because substrate.xyz is actually registered (probably a bandwagon reg)No one bought substrate or skiff surely... for $2,995 each, come off it!!!
To the brainlets... no I'm not saying it didn't happen, I'm saying they're awful.
Good work though.
The issue seems to be some who doubt Xyz sales, rather than not liking the domain. Whenever an xyz sale is posted, the naysayers seem to question its validity or the sense of the buyer.
Indeed. My opinion of the name isn't the same of the seller or the buyer. I do however personally see little value in substrate.xyz. I wouldn't be in a rush to buy the same in .com either. But it is what it is...
With respect, you're in every xyz thread spreading doubt about the extension, its sales, its unknown future etc.. that you're free to do for sure. But then you claim to be admiring the success of others from afar. Well it really doesn't sound or look like admiration. It makes you sound jealous, & keeping at it will eventually make it look silly & it is trolling in a way, & so you're gonna get dislikes/downvotes.
Looking silly is surreptitiously downvoting anything that doesn't fit your particular thoughts exactly, being unduly obsequious at every opportunity and worse is giving bad advice or comments that make no sense.
You went through my posts to find dirt? What are you a politician? A kid?
No, I've had to suffer your comments, I dug them out of my recent memory.
My attitude doesn't look like anything of the sort, crying about whether someone thinks a word is bad or good is left to those who are emotionally incontinent.
I try to engage. Sometimes observing quietly leads to a better learning experience. I'm all about good faith.. Are you?
Good faith isn't denigrating others that hold an opposing opinion. One negative comment about .XYZ and it's as if you've been shot in the heart. Nobody needs you running protection for them because the nasty man suggested that a few words in a domain aren't that good.
Yeah, I'd rather own Portably or Savanna than all of the ones I mentioned or the two obscure ones announced here, which leaves me baffled. It shows what I'm saying really.... if the ones that sell are the uncommon words and the common words don't sell then the equation is hard to make work to realise a return. If there is some correlation between particular obscure words selling well in XYZ then that's interesting, the question is which words can one choose to make wise investments?
Good faith isn't denigrating others that hold an opposing opinion. One negative comment about .XYZ and it's as if you've been shot in the heart. Nobody needs you running protection for them because the nasty man suggested that a few words in a domain aren't that good.
Are you surprised every time when decent sales in an obscure extension are announced that it leads to conversation about it's investment efficacy? Don't be. Cause you're on a FORUM about DOMAIN NAME INVESTING. Sheesh.
Yeah, I'd rather own Portably or Savanna than all of the ones I mentioned or the two obscure ones announced here, which leaves me baffled. It shows what I'm saying really.... if the ones that sell are the uncommon words and the common words don't sell then the equation is hard to make work to realise a return. If there is some correlation between particular obscure words selling well in XYZ then that's interesting, the question is which words can one choose to make wise investments?
Those are some terrible names, I wonder if they were someone just registering every dictionary word available using a script and paying .01 or .99 a registration. I mean who is doing their pitch on Shark Tank saying, "hey Mark Cuban find us at Tittynope.xyz."
It seems that every domain report for .XYZ is a terrible word which is interesting. I think it's quite a strange market to be operating in, the normal rules don't appear to apply which I'm the first to admit.
