NEW "G"S KICK ASS ON EXACT MATCH .COM SALES COMPS

[168]

MERRY CHRISTMAS NEW "G" SUPORTERS !

DEDICATED TO LOLWARRIOR

For takin some heat 12.6 / pg 6


Source: Namebio/Sold.Domains
Please post additional sales comps if you have them. There wasn't much to find due to .Com age and NDA's
Disclosure: I invest in .Global and.Club
Free endorsement

IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY!
YES FOLKS. THAT'S A WHOPPING 180,000.00 ( AFTER EXPENSES )


HAPPY HUNTING !

DATE (.COM) .COM NEW “G” DIFFERENCE DOMAIN

5.08 6500 50000 +43500 LUXURY.ESTATE
5.09 2000 15000 +13000 JOBS.GLOBAL
9.15 2055 19200 +17145 WEB.BIZ
2.16 3438 12000 + 8562 LK.GLOBAL
4.13 350 13750 +13400 CHINESE.CLUB
4.14 9500 100000 +90500 AUTISM.ROCKS
7.08 3688 25000 +21312 BUSINESS.GLOBAL

27531 234950 + 207419

 

[slader23]

No. You are kidding yourself.



I am wasting my time. I agree with that.

Your right I'm kidding myself. I thought you would have realized you were wasting your time hours ago.

 

[mad409]

I don't visit it on a daily basis.

Maybe the site has changed in the meantime. It still looks like a 5$ logo to me.

Not sure what you mean.

And from the pro!

 

[168]

I am not trying to distort the truth. I don't need to. It is self evident what is true.

It defies logic why a nGTLD name would on average be not only be worth the same but also more than that or than previous sales. Think about it.

It's not that the domain market has gone up.

That is obviously nonsense that should be apparent to anyone.





if you think that in a world where most startups want a .com, nGTLDs will sell for more on average then you are dreaming.

OFF TOPIC PLEASE REFRAIN OR STOP POSTING
More opinion vs fact?
I really do appreciate relevant specific information especially since the scoreboard went up
We need .commies like you to step up and play by the rules or we will never know
Otherwise yea your rep is beginning to be worthy of the penalty box.
Happy Hunting

 

[168]

at least I have, unlike you, posted data. You are the one using rethoric because you have nothing else to offer.

What I have posted is sound. If you think value of nGTLD > value of .com you still need to learn a lot.

The data you posted may be sound but that's not the point. The data is completely irrelevant to the topic. Your also trying
to pass it off as relevant in some twisted way.
Sladers posts stand on their own merit. People that understand business know experienced vs inexperienced.
Slader 23 has offered sound logic and known standards that apply to all industries. What is rampant in this industry
is the general lack of understanding business concepts such as cycles, growth, and the expansion of product necessary
to ensure future growth when the original growth product reaches peak or near peak saturation and becomes stale.
ICANN may have blown it's wade all at once but the market will correct this in time.
Happy Hunting

 

[disaac81]

The new G's have certainly brought a whole bunch of idiots to this game who think they are experts from the moment they post their first post.

Real lack of intelligence coming from the same people again and again. No point trying to teach them, they are clueless and live in a dream world.

.COM rules. Very amusing thread though, trying to say ngtld's are worth more than the .com, lol.

 

[168]

This thread is amusing to some extend, except for the uncivilized behaviour in some posts. Some Christmas spirit wouldnt hurt.
And please dont start to debate X.mas vs Xmas.com.......

You may not be aware but there are a few party poopers that like to intentionally disrupt conversations in topics they have no
interest in, have demonstrated a certain level of ignorance in business operations in general, and haven't taken several polite requests by several participants to bugger off and play their games somewhere else. One can only assume their desire for attention is greater than respectfully restraining themselves in a professional manner.
So if they don't get the message it will get louder and less considerate.
Cheers

 

[168]

I tried to be nice about it when I posted my response. A couple of the new TLD sales beating the .com actually made sense. But @168 did leave out an important part, the sales venues, and though he did post the dates of the .com sales, some people could have misread them as month/day instead of month/year.
The point is that some of these are old sales and even sold at places like NameJet, where things mostly go for reseller prices.

luxuryestate.com was sold in 2008. Fine, maybe it wouldn't sell today, or for hardly any more than it did in 2008. I'm no expert.

webbiz.com was sold on Namejet, probably not an end user sale.
web.biz is clearly better here anyway, in my opinion.

Weren't all of the .global ones sold by the .global registry? So how does this statement apply:
"IF YOU HAD INVESTED IN THE NEW "G"'S BELOW VS. .COM YOU WOULD BE ABOUT 180K HAPPIER TODAY! "
And it seems like one of them may have even been sold by the registry to a domainer.

autism.rocks was an outlier sale, most likely a donation to an autism charity.

chinese.club, a Namejet sale, was compared to an end user sale for chinese.club. Yes, I still think the chinese.club sale was good. I think anyone here could tell you that chineseclub.com would sell for much more than 350 USD to an end user. How much? I don't know.

Now please stop telling people they are only spewing rhetoric while you are failing to look at the reality of those few sales he posted and wanting us to bow to your own rhetoric instead.

This isn't news, in my opinion, and shouldn't be in the News section (oh, never mind, it did get moved). It's a list of a few sales without some of the key details.
But I really don't mind that he posted it in the news section. People who are gullible will lap it up wherever it's posted.

You have some good rhetoric and some interesting excuses, venue, sold to a domainer, outlier in an attempt to discredit the only data this industry has to rely on for comps. Since when does venue matter ? Since when does domainer vs enduser matter?
Sales data is irrelevant because it was sold to a domainer ?
Sales data is irrelevant because a registrar sold it ?
Outliers don't count either ?
The only sales that count are what ?
Sounds like the pure definition of .rhetoric
I didn't bother to post New "G" dates because just about everybody would be aware the sales would have been sometime
in the last 2 years and if a reader was a newbie it wouldn't take much additional reading to know this.
The sales venues are relevant Why ? This was strictly a letter for letter, dollar for dollar comparison intentionally to deter personal agenda, .commie propaganda, and excuses to discredit hard, factual, data.
Sales are sales and it's irrelevant who profited. It's absurd to suggest a sale doesn't count because someone other than a domainer
profited or pure speculation it would have sold for more if it was someone else. Seriously These .coms have been on the shelf for 30 years ! Was this even a thought as to why they didn't command a higher value ? Again Rhetorical ?
Even I didn't expect to see these kinds of results so soon. This is HISTORICAL. Why wouldn't it be news worthy when it's the biggest current speculative debate in this industry ?Will it continue ? who knows. A lot of people have large portfolios to protect I get it.

The point of the title is not only is it possible it's happening and maybe people should start paying attention to the only factual data we have to go by instead of pure conjecture from self described experts. Being in an industry a long time doesn't make you an expert. Sure it helps but if that expert is having difficulty distinguishing their opinion from fact then it's important to report the facts. .commies were also quite rude and demanding "proof" all while expecting readers to "just take their opinion over several others. Fair enough. Bam Done. The claim that New "G"s will never be more valuable is now known to be FALSE.
Please, We all know there are some .coms, a very small percentage, that will always be at the top of the sales charts. There aren't even other .coms that will topple them.
"Experts" are sure It's going to take time for end users to "trust and accept" That is straight up BS.
The claim that New"G"s aren't being developed is being debunked daily as well. Another weak argument tossed around.
The difference between the .commies and the New "G" supporters is your either a domainer and support the industry or your a .commie and support .com and there are plenty of discussions for just .com and if your not interested in the New "G"s then please
don't bother, insult, skew facts, in threads where people want to learn facts and discuss their interests in New "G"s.
Cheers

 

[168]

INSURANCEME.COM last sold for $449 on 2015-08-08 at GoDaddy


Insurance.me $15,000 2016-07-12 Sedo

This won't be included for the purpose of this thread it's just another example of preferred relevance.
The .com is being used as a redirect for a boxing site.
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

The claim that New "G"s will never be more valuable is now known to be FALSE.

what I find is that when I find a sale the .com is usually selling higher. So I think it's just not true that they are selling for more. I don't know how the list was made and who made it but for me it is the opposite, it's much harder to find an nGTLD that sells for more.

more random sales..

jeuxcasino.fr 5,000 USD 2016-03-29 Uniregistry
jeux.casino 1,132 USD 2016-04-19 Sedo

sex.guide 605 USD 2016-05-18 Flippa
sexguide.nl 1,550 USD 2013-10-02 Sedo
sexguide.be 984 USD 2015-06-04 Sedo

healthy.news 250 USD 2015-09-22 Flippa
healthynews.com 600 USD 2005-10-01 SnapNames

seoacademy.in 1,000 USD 2012-03-28 Sedo
seo.academy 798 USD 2015-10-16 Sedo

businesscollege.com 6,100 USD 2013-04-28 NameJet
business.college 3,900 USD 2016-01-21 NameJet

 

[Rainmaker-NL]

Nice ! Now you have 2 crowds to sell to.! Someone might even want to name a space craft RA7 China has been active in sending
up space craft lately. RA - Sun .xyz - little universe (this is why it's popular in China besides the cheap regs)
Happy Hunting!

Off-topic ??

 

[wwwweb]

You need more data to prove your point. in 2016 it is just not true, .com is still first pick, gtld's are an after thought. Many companies paid brand protection, and maybe were not educated enough, against 127M .com's registered, you only listed a few G sales, I think those data points are not strong enough to validate such an assumption against a whole extension.

 

[168]

Off-topic ??

Yes
Everyone gets A pass, then a friendly reminder, then a rude reminder, then kicked off
Cheers

 

[168]

You need more data to prove your point. in 2016 it is just not true, .com is still first pick, gtld's are an after thought. Many companies paid brand protection, and maybe were not educated enough, against 127M .com's registered, you only listed a few G sales, I think those data points are not strong enough to validate such an assumption against a whole extension.

Yes .COM is still first pick, for now there is no debate on this point
No New "G"s are not an after thought
Yes definitely more data is needed. Can you admit it happened much sooner than anybody would of thought ?
Yes the list was short mainly because of no data for the .COM sales Age, NDAs probably big factor
Now that some of use are aware, it will be tracked by both perspectives.
No there was not an assumption against a whole extension. Yet another BS claim to discredit the findings. Really, Just the Facts Jack.
It was simply a test to get other "so called experts" to back down on the opposite claim of New "G"s never being worth more than
(A) .com Not all of them Duh. The top .com sales will most likely be the top for a long time. That's a given.
YES, it's not likely to be all .coms -
I never said anything about "validation or the whole extension". YOU DID AND YOUR STRAIGHT UP WRONG MAKING FALSE ASSUMPTIONS OF THE INTENT. Just the facts Jack.
Honestly I was shocked at the significantly higher ROI. In investing that's all that matters.
Also, quite happy as a fellow patron of these threads was unjustly attacked. Haven't seen an apology to him yet either
Now, all kinds of other irrelevant data and excuses as to why the only factual data we have to learn from is somehow not true or "doesn't count" Absurd. it's just MORE BS It's well known the lack of data is an issue Ignoring the data we do have just because
it's not what .commies want to see is Ummm.......unprofessional just like suggesting if a company gets something other than a .com
somehow that makes them instantly ignorant.
Even though Dordomai has been less than pleasant he is at least trying to add to the list something that is benefiting us all.
The SCOREBOARD is almost tied in the number of examples thanks to him.
The good thing for the domainers that back the industry and not just .com is the .com list won't even come close to 180k Roi YES!
For now at least. I and others intend to enjoy the HISTORICAL MOMENT. Who knows if it will continue but it sure will be fun to track.

My business is in the Bay Area. More cc's are showing up and New"g"s are starting to show up Go ahead. Tell paypal, Adobe, and
Facebook, Google and the others I have listed here How "uneducated they are" and while your at it the cc's too. Save them please.
I use these sites. so do other real people.
WHD.Global Domain/Hosting Events
PayPal.me Obvious
ABC.xyz Investor info
Facebook.Design Design Resources
Coffee.Club Obvious
BrewMasters. Club
Twitch.Tv Adobe

Seen These or have been there
Teach.Vegas Heard about this @ NameCon last yr
Escape.Ninga Heard about this via friend
724.Host @HostingCon LA
Freedom.Press SanFrancisco
Ta.co Seen it advertised but re directs to .com
I've also seen .biz/.co /.ai /.io driving around
BhMedia.co Thru NewCo.co SanFranCisco
Ginger.io
Kite.io
AltaMotors.co Electric Motorcycles Bay Area
Happy Hunting

 

[wormfood]

6 reported sales in .estate on namebio. Four in 2014, two in 2015. Zero in 2016, obviously.

virtual.estate 8,000 USD 2015-05-24 NoktaDomains/ DomainHoldings
apivita.estate 1,635 USD 2015-05-24 Sedo
world.estate 35,000 USD 2014-11-26 Nokta
newyork.estate 9,000 USD 2014-10-15 Private
luxury.estate 50,000 USD 2014-07-16 DomainHoldings
vienna.estate 2,039 USD 2014-06-25 Sedo

18 on dnpric.es. http://dnpric.es/?q=.estate
Just one in 2016: home.estate $31.99 at Dynadot.
Just three in 2015
7 are from February 2014 and sold for $1000 each.

"Well, what do you know...apivita.estate is available
$29.88
Renewal $29.88 for 1 year"

Vienna.estate forwards to a site where someone has put their .estate and other domains for sale down the page.

Yeah, this seems like a great extension to invest in based on reported sales over nearly 3 years.
Luxury.estate sold for 50k so there's no denying..
When there's only one reported "sale" of an extension in 2016, I guess you have to reach back into 2014 and find the highest selling one to find a good comp for an exact match .com..


Autism.rocks is obviously something no one would normally buy to resell to an end user, unless the name was already in use and that person was okay with cybersquatting. It makes no sense to point to this sale.
So yes, it's a "one-off" sale.


204 .global sales on namebio.
68 in 2014. 40 sold by DotGlobal, 28 by ROTD.
55 in 2015. 3 at Afternic, 1 Private, 3 at Sedo, 1 at Uniregistry, 4 at ROTD. The rest are DotGlobal.
81 in 2016. 3 at Sedo, The rest were DotGlobal / .Global Registry

Lookin' good!

If you set the minimum sale price to $5000, you only get 29 sales, which were all sold by the registry.

Okay, here's one on dnpric.es
rentalcars.global
October 2014 $ 7,000.00 USD Afternic

Whois of rentalcars.global.. Admin Email: @traveljigsaw.com.
traveljigsaw goes to rentalcars.com. And the whois of rentalcars.com also shows traveljigsaw.
But rentalcars.global does nothing.

Wait a second, namebio says:
rentalcars.global 7,000 USD 2014-11-19 DotGlobal
Darn..

 

[168]

Unlikely I'd be able to beat this sale though
genetics.com 150,000 USD 2016-01-26 NameJet

This guy owns it now

Agree.
Also in this example I think the .com version looks better
the .global, I think has better branding potential for the subject matter
I know .com is perceived as a global extension but the actual .global drives it home in conveying the companies reach

 

[168]

Unlikely I'd be able to beat this sale though
genetics.com 150,000 USD 2016-01-26 NameJet

I bet north of double 300k + could even reach 500k-1m

 

[168]

This nonsense is entertaining. Who are you trying to convince?

If something is profitable, and has low acceptance, you keep your mouth sh*t and acquire as much as you can.

However with gTLDs we see the opposite happening.

They now have low acceptance, low retention, and low sales rates. Yet we see people constantly trying to tell people how valuable they are.

Makes sense. <3

1. I don't need to convince anyone.
2. Yes it could be construed as nonsense and entertaining
3. You can keep your mouth shut if you like, I'm here to share
and celebrate. Nobody expected to see this so soon even if the sample is small.
That is why I see it interesting enough to post IN BIG BOLD LETTERS.
There is no question some New"G"s have value. Instances like these simply help to establish
a base value range which is helpful to members on this forum interested in New "G"s
It could be an anomaly or a trend. Only time and sales will tell. A persons opinion or personal agenda is immaterial.
HAPPY HUNTING

 

[168]

Thanks mate for your post and some great examples! And Happy Christmas to you too

Top Gun - They want the Truth? They can't handle the Truth
History in the making. I didn't even expect to see this so soon.
I suppose we have the antagonist's to thank for this small victory
Happy Hunting !

 

[168]

Interesting when newbies boast and post their first sale many participate in their excitement.
When New "G"s boast and post their first higher value sales it's some how propaganda.
I myself didn't expect to see this milestone so soon.
This is historical.
Why it was decided it wasn't news worthy to the entire industry is beyond me.
Happy Hunting

 

[168]

the highest e+ word.com and nGTLD sales:

ebet.com 1,350,000 USD 2013-10-23 Private
eflowers.com 1,000,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
egifts.com 250,000 USD 2003-02-01 Private
esignature.com 150,000 USD 2011-08-17 DomainGuardians
ediscovery.com 100,000 USD 2012-04-04 Uniregistry / DomainAdvisors
eromance.com 100,000 USD 2008-03-12 Moniker
ecruise.com 100,000 USD 2004-09-01 Private
emedia.com 60,000 USD 2011-11-16 SnapNames



the highest i+ word.com and nGTLD sales

isearch.com 300,000 USD 2008-08-27 Private
iguide.com 100,000 USD 2009-08-07 Afternic
ipets.com 75,000 USD 2008-06-11 Afternic
ipal.com 59,000 USD 2009-08-19 Sedo
iacademy.com 55,000 USD 2014-04-09 GoDaddy

i.work 10,000 USD 2016-04-01 Uniregistry
i.club 9,999 USD 2016-09-16 Sedo
i.rent 9,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.link 8,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.click 8,000 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.bio 7,000 USD 2015-12-21 Uniregistry
i.ski 3,250 USD 2016-01-11 NamesCon
i.company 2,150 USD 2016-02-22 Sedo
i.forex 999 USD 2016-11-03 Sedo

Nice list. So what. Where's the comps ?
Do you not get the parameters of the debate ?
word for word comps
Happy Hunting

 

[168]

The parameters are objective and honest reporting.

That's your universe.
The parameters I set on my thread are not objective they are very specific for a reason. To minimize twisted dishonest debate.
Just the facts Jack. Otherwise start your own thread and have all the objective and dishonest debates you enjoy.
Happy Hunting

 

[dordomai]

That's your universe.
The parameters I set on my thread are not objective they are very specific for a reason. To minimize twisted dishonest debate.
Just the facts Jack. Otherwise start your own thread and have all the objective and dishonest debates you enjoy.
Happy Hunting

Ok I get it that we are still in the 'pump' phase. When will the dump start?

 

[168]

single sales are meaningless. On average .com sells for far more. As nicely shown in the many examples that others gave and as shown by my /threads/new-g-s-kick-ass-on-exact-match-com-sales-comps.

This resembles a pump and dump scheme.

If single sales are meaningless then your examples are too. Duh

SCORE New "G" exact match examples 8 .Com examples 4
GAME ON !!!
Cheers

 

[dordomai]

If single sales are meaningless then your examples are too. Duh

SCORE New "G" exact match examples 8 .Com examples 4
GAME ON !!!
Cheers

Far more were given even in the others threads. I could dig up far more.

 

[168]

Ok I get it that we are still in the 'pump' phase. When will the dump start?

You are clearly on your way
Thanks
Happy Hunting