Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (14-3447)

[CurtisNeeley]

Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (14-3447)
Complaint p9 with live links to evidence of unsafe searches of a common carrier.
Complaint closing follows...

2. Plaintiff/Appellant also prays for immediate injunctive relief such that all violations of 18 U.S.C. 2511* and all violations of Ark Code Ann. 5-41-103* are ordered ceased immediately for Plaintiff/Appellant's name and seeks orders for the Federal Communications Commission to regulate “online” wire communications as a Title II common carrier and require ratings of all “obscene, indecent, or profane” JPG files communicated in interstate or world-wide commerce before indexed as soon as possible because this is already required by clear wording of U.S. law in 47 U.S.C. §151*.

Motion for Summary Justice

Where has NamePros crew heard about my demands for this?
NamePros posts by me with "FCC".
NamePros posts by me with "common carrier".
It appears all here should have already known?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who ever owns a domain owned in the past by me on August 26th will get to meet me in United States Court just like Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation, and the FCC have already.
I will probably pay less than $10 to restart this business website.
You may pay $97 and own it today and be in court by August.
ICANN knew in 2009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I know the future of the domain "name" business but this can read in old posts I made and find this when it was a less certain future than it is now
Who here has spoken to an FCC commissioner on recorded telecommunications?
I have.
This commissioner wasn't Tom.

I predict a unanimous Title II common carrier realization vote called reclassification of that mysterious imaginary medium that has been a fraud since 1997.

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0204/DOC-331869A1.pdf

 

[CurtisNeeley]

NamePros posts by me with "FCC".
NamePros posts by me with "common carrier".

Game-over!
That's what you said last time. But sure, do keep people updated.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who ever owns the domain sl__pspot.com, which was owned in the past by me, on August 26th will get to meet me in United States Court just like Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation, and the FCC have already and in ARKANSAS.
I will pay less than $10 to re-register this business website after it expires or begin a lawsuit against the new owner!
You may pay $97 and own it today and be in court before August.
ICANN knew this in 2009
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who here has spoken to an FCC commissioner on recorded telecommunications? I have.
This commissioner wasn't Tom or have parents who are immigrants from India.

I predict an almost unanimous (4-1) Title II common carrier realization vote called reclassification of that mysterious imaginary medium that has been a fraud since 1997.

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0204/DOC-331869A1.pdf

I came here originally as a "recovering" but incompetent former genius with an extreme brain injury. I will always have a unique perspective. Feedback and dialog with sharp minds here was a great help.

A very highly intellectual lawsuit... well-done and commendable. Good luck

The trouble with my current lawsuit is that a culturally senile judicial branch in "America" thinks this is an issue for Oligarchs to decide instead of a jury of my peers and I do not honor the considerations of ANY Article III justice over 68 and will never seek their review.

1) I may write an amicus for Garcia v Google Inc, et al, (12-57302)
I hope the Ninth Circuit protects the free speech of Ms Garcia and have spoken with Cris Armenta Esq about another attack on GOOG, the U.S. Copy[rite] regime, and 230 that leaves ONLY one honorable option. The oldest Oligarch at the en banc review was 68 and I imagine they will rule in her favor. If a SCOTUS appeal is needed, you and everyone on Earth will see my argument(s).

2) I wrote an amicus brief and amicus reply for Edwards, et. al. v Beck, et. al., (14-1891)
ABORTION should soon no longer be a legal question anywhere because the inalienable right to abort for 12-weeks will exist.

3) I may write an amicus for the coming lawsuit to prevent the Arkansas telemedication ban that will soon need to be tossed out if the inalienable human right to abort for 12-weeks is not addressed before the Senate and House bills are consolidated. (Probably wont be according to my dialogs with Sen. Sissy Irvin.)

4) I will prepare an amicus for the SCOTUS SSU case that leaves only ONE honorable result and nobody has addressed this yet. I will provide this to another party's attorney to rewrite and file. Everyone on Earth will see this and agree.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

F.C.C. Net Neutrality Rules Clear Hurdle as Republicans Concede to Obama - NYTimes

The FCC will begin regulating nternet service like a public utility, prohibiting companies from paying for faster lanes on the nternet or displaying a naked sexual organ without requiring ..Oops not yet...... oh wait.... that will require a complaint to the FCC.

This case was dismissed but will be refiled as a brief that reads as if the motivation for 230 was just revoked by millions of activists.

 

[NPer]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who ever owns the domain sl__pspot.com, which was owned in the past by me, on August 26th will get to meet me in United States Court just like Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation, and the FCC have already and in ARKANSAS.
I will pay less than $10 to re-register this business website after it expires or begin a lawsuit against the new owner!
You may pay $97 and own it today and be in court before August.
ICANN knew this in 2009
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me get this right... You are going to take someone to court for registering a domain that you didn't pay a renewal on? You should be careful that the person does not sue you for damages.

Then you go on to say that if the current registrant lets it expires, and a new registrant comes along, you will take this individual to court... all because you want to pay less than $10?

Am I missing something? The case will get dismissed/ thrown out because you were negligent, and being petty. And you can face serious backlash thereafter.

And you don't want to pay $97 today to own it, but would rather have someone else pay this amount so that you can them to court?

You will burn your time, and energies for hours, weeks... because you want it for than $10, and don't want to pay $97?

This makes no sense.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

Let me get this right... You are going to take someone to court for registering a domain that you didn't pay a renewal on? You should be careful that the person does not sue you for damages.

EXACTLY! Anyone registers sleepspot.com for any reason whatever and they will be sued in Federal Court for the Western District of Arkansas for violation of my human rights to protect the person, etc. I do not play domain-name games in "pretend courts" or arbitrate. I will pay filing fees before I spend more than $10 to register sleepspot.com

Then you go on to say that if the current registrant lets it expires, and a new registrant comes along, you will take this individual to court... all because you want to pay less than $10?

EXACTLY; It appears I got that across well enough. I would sue the owner of GoName today had I not promised the owner to let the name expire before I sue. If they register it they will be sued.

Am I missing something? The case will get dismissed/ thrown out because you were negligent, and being petty. And you can face serious backlash thereafter.

Nope. I take my rights very seriously. Ask GOOG, MSFT, the USMC, the United States Attorney General, the Federal Communications Commission, or the ACLU. Oh wait, you must think only BO is telling the FCC to regulate "online" as the Title II common carrier these have always been and think recently dismissed but not yet reconsidered Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (14-3447) or the thousands of pages filed in response to FCC comments by media lawyers had no impact? RIGHT. I have spoken to FCC Commissioner's staff by phone. See a few linked (HERE) <<<< a few but not all.

You might notice that ECFS allegedly does not allow PDF links but PDF links to indecent evidence searches are inside most of my FCC filings like this one. The wild, wild, west of "online" and 230 starts to be be made a safe common carrier union of wire and radio medium broadcast communications TOMORROW.

And you don't want to pay $97 today to own it, but would rather have someone else pay this amount so that you can them to court?

NOT EXACTLY, BUT CLOSE; It appears I got the general idea across well enough.
I prefer NOT to have to teach some new registrant about real law and juries versus "pretend" domain name law.

You will burn your time, and energies for hours, weeks... because you want it for [less] than $10, and don't want to pay $97?

Nope, I will enjoy using my time and energy like at go-oogle.net just to show judges how easy it would be for GOOG to not show naked images online if "pornternet" was not exactly the way GOOG wants "online" to be.

This makes no sense.

Nope, It makes no sense whatsoever that anyone would rather register this when it expires and face me in United States Court. I will either get up on 7/26/2015 and register this domain or begin litigation against the new owner on 7/26/2015

I will register sleepspot.com for less than $10 after it has expired and rebuild this or will begin a lawsuit against the new owner. I do not care if this is GoName, a reader of this thread, or other. If you think this is petty, you will get to see. I will update you here.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING SEEKING EN BANC HEARING

No. 14-3447​

IN THE UNITED STATES ​

COURT OF APPEALS​

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
CurtisJ.NeeleyJr.
Appellant,
vs​

5 Federal Communications Commissioners,
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, et. al.,
US Attorney General Eric Holder Esq,
Microsoft Corporation,
Google Inc.​

Appellees.


PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING SEEKING EN BANC HEARING ​

This civil action will be the most significant communication case ever pursued in all history whether quickly resulting in justice or not. The moral, human right* and not the “American”, legal rite* for exclusively controlling communications disguised as [sic] “internet” or copy[rite]* was before the District Court with a Plaintiff/Appellant seeking only to enforce rules written decades to centuries before wire communications were disguised as [sic] “internet” and called a “[holy] new medium” in a FACTUAL error one1 justice affirming this error in 1997 will now correct.

Wire communications, 47 U.S.C. §153 ¶(59),* include [sic] “internet”, email, mobile phones, wi-fi, and all telephones. Distant communications beside two-way radios and some satellite communications are nothing more than wire communications defined in 1934 when the Federal Communications Commission “FCC” was created.

>
Pages 2-15 off-site​

1. http://curtisneeley.blogspot.com/2015/03/petition-for-panel-rehearing-seeking-en.html
2. https://curtisneeley.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/petition-for-panel-rehearing-seeking-en-banc-hearing/
3. http://community.beliefnet.com/curtisneeley/blog/2015/03/10/petition_for_rehearing
4. http://theendofpornbywire.org/PETITION-FOR-REHEARING-SEEKING-EN-BANC-HEARING.html

I might lose this particular litigation because of offending the United States Courts in the end but not if the U. S. laws are followed. The resulting movie and book will be great!
It is criminal TODAY to present "obscene, indecent, or profane" material to any unauthenticated party in a radio wi-fi broadcast. It seems there needs to be millions of complaints now by parents and spouses.... Hmm. How long might that take?

 

[timestamp]

I've put that domain in my wishlist and I'll try to reg it with coupon codes.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

I've put that domain in my wishlist and I'll try to reg it with coupon codes.

Well, I would rather you not plan to register a domain which had begun establishing a common law trademark on March 4, 2000 but was not re-registered due to my automobile accident on Sept. 03, 2002. When this "cyber-squatted" domain name expires on Tuesday Aug 25, 2015 or shortly thereafter I will try to register this domain on Wednesday Aug 26, 2015. Registration will be done during the corporate re-launch "party" for restoring the business you see linked above after about fifteen years.

If you or anyone else registers this domain when it expires a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas will be begun. Your posting data here and membership information will be subpoenaed from NamePros. Please do not further distress me.

I have the raw code for the reservation software linked from above but have not been able to get the software to function because the inventory description files and (blah... blah... blah.. blah... too hard to figure out) and because of not use traditional databases for anything. CurtisRes was proprietary UNIX software and will be again when I have several months to work on CurtisRes without interruptions.

Any registry of this domain will be intentional interference with the re-launch of the website you see linked above from March 31, 2001 at around 18:54:03 by an uninterested third party.

The former head of corporate signing for a rather huge company (WM) helped with the logo and branding and other marketing issues. There are several hundred witnesses.

I promised GoNames I would not initiate a lawsuit until the domain expires and will send them a physical printout of this response to a legal challenge. This will be used to advise of becoming a defendant in the next lawsuit for refusing to return this domain to its first owner when requested.

This will then cause an abrupt end of the domain-name economy. The future value of domains that are not used for bona fide good-faith business purposes will be ZERO!

The FCC agency has jurisdiction TODAY for use of domain names in interstate or world-wide communications. I am sure you guys all hear the wealthy first generation American-by-choice Commissioner Ajit Pia talking of Pandora's box the FCC opened by declaring the [sic] "internet" a Title II common carrier?

SleepSpot Inc will attempt to resume this ownership of the domain next week and will not begin litigation due to a refusal to allow registration transfer until August 26, 2015. I promised to wait till August 26, 2015 but see no value in continued cyper-squatting for GoNames except perhaps pride?

 

[timestamp]

Being a first owner and having a trademark doesn't entitles you to have a .com.
Why do you think that you'll be able to register domain after 30 days of expiration?
I'm not from US of A. Will that be more expensive for you?

 

[N-A]

I think that this closely relates to the story and hardships faced by Igal Lichtmman's family with his passing.

We never know what life will throw our way, and as such, everyone should have someone they trust to give special or general power of attorney to so that intangible assets aren't lost.

Recently, I read of a .TV name being snapped up for reg-fee, because the previous owner was having legal issues at the time and was unable to get on to renew it. (Would have to dig through the .TV discussion for this)

Steps that everyone should take:

• Special or general power of attorney
• A joint bank account to make payments for renewals over X domains/X years
• An account funded to pay for renewals until one is able to sell them
• A trustee, appointed to a specific person, to hold the domain names if it is too complicated for the next of kin
• Next of kin as a member on your company to make authoritative decisions in certain cases

Those are just a few that I can think of, and have implemented two on my own.

This is just going to cause you more pain and heartache than what it's worth. Couldn't you simply re-brand your business and software? Surely your previous customers would understand and use your new and updated product.

If you're going to fight, it may be a losing battle, as opposed to the winning one -- waking up.

I really don't see what you're fighting for. I've been in a similar case at 15 with a partner who stole an entire entity from me and cut me out of the picture, because I didn't seek legal counsel, nor even thought of doing so. Do I have proof intellectual property rights to fight? Sure I do. Would it be worth my time for revenge or to retain ownership of something I no longer have interest in? Not at all. I let it go. The past is in the past.

Nonetheless, good luck.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

@timestamp It does especially now that the "nternet" is regulated by the FCC as a common carrier of wire communications. Since you are threatening to tortuously register sleepspot.com from outside the United States I would remind you there are few registrars (none I know of) flouting U.S. laws. If you find one they will not remain profitable or exist for long after the FCC requires all publicly accessible DNS servers in the United States to not longer resolve in ways that violate U.S. law(s). This Future is coming without any question.

The following U.S. law is part of the statutory authority I will use to ruin you and GoNames and any registrar on this planet who allows this wrong to continue.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1125#d

I will register sleepspot the day after it expires and will not wait 30 days. I thought this was clear above. I will let GONAME-FL.COM, INC. know this Monday and let them know requiring domain registration on only their registrar is already tortuous. I will not wait till August to teach them this obvious fact. This registrar is artificially hiking the registration fees illegally and own the sleepspot.com domain they are offering for sale far beyond costs. This fact excuses a lawsuit next week in my opinion. I promised to wait till sleepspot expired but this was when I did not realize the "registrar" was actually selling the domain.

|||From above||| When this "cyber-squatted" domain name expires on Tuesday Aug 25, 2015 or shortly thereafter I will try to register this domain on Wednesday Aug 26, 2015. Registration will be done during the corporate re-launch "party" for restoring the business you see linked above after about fifteen years.||||||/ From above|||

I see now the date is July 25th in one record, August 25th in another and still years from now at Godaddy. I reported these to ICCAN.

International litigation is much more honorable than United States law after United states judges de facto abolished most juries. I have addressed websites in Portugal, Russia, Britain, Poland, and another European nation I forget the name of though this might be a prospective nation not yet admitted. Because you are outside the U.S.A. makes litigation against you much more simple and predictable except for translation costs. What is your native tongue?

 

[CurtisNeeley]

This is just going to cause you more pain and heartache than what it's worth. Couldn't you simply re-brand your business and software? Surely your previous customers would understand and use your new and updated product.

If you're going to fight, it may be a losing battle, as opposed to the winning one -- waking up.

Nonetheless, good luck.

I am going to fight if I need to after this expires this and will win. I find one record from GoDaddy saying this does not expire for years. I think the domain name economy is a fraud. I think ICANN is complicit. I believe the whole "web" is immoral by design in the United States. Unsolicited indexing with stolen content "snippets" is illegal already everywhere besides the U.S. The "online" everyone younger than 31 grew up with will not exist in five years because no binary files will be allowed communicated interstate without ratings nor will unrated websites and parked ad domains still exist.

My former customers now all use Priceline,com. I believe they promised to use only PCLN "online" or they did 15 years ago anyway. I know where this is going and would look crazy to tell this today just like everyone here thought I was five years ago when I stated the FCC would regulate "online" as a Title II common carrier.
Thanks for the good wishes.
BTW: My spouse turned off life-support to let me die against the wishes of my parents like happened to Terri Schiavo, I did not quite die fast enough when the respirator was removed.

 

[Paul]

Keep in mind that ISPs are now common carriers. The Internet itself cannot be a common carrier because it is not a legal entity, but rather an abstract concept realized by a large number of interconnected ISPs. While these ISPs often run caching nameservers, they have little to no influence on authoritative nameservers.

ICANN is a very powerful organization. It would be wise not to cross them.

 

[timestamp]

If you succede in this, you will change "domaining industry"?
Anyone could get their domain back with few simple steps.
If you have software company you clearly have a $100, but you choose harder way of getting domain. Just to prove a point, and not to pay extortion price. Let me hit you with some knowledge, every time you buy something you are paying extortion price. That's how this world works.
You have a company, trademark, to probably extort money from others. You are not doing it for the better of humanity, you are doing it because of money.
Btw. domain will be availabe for you to register somewhere in October, unless you have some special threatment, and that is if current owner decides not to renew it.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

Keep in mind that ISPs are now common carriers. The Internet itself cannot be a common carrier because it is not a legal entity, but rather an abstract concept realized by a large number of interconnected ISPs. While these ISPs often run caching nameservers, they have little to no influence on authoritative nameservers.

ICANN is a very powerful organization. It would be wise not to cross them.

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are what GOOG fraudulently alleged to be in Federal Court against me in order to coax a judge to decide GOOG qualified for the exceptions created for ISPs in the VARA Copy[rite] Act update in 1990. The elderly oligarch appearing addicted to pornography, of course, used this FRAUD to invalidate the VARA Copy[rite] Act update from 1990 though this was written over a decade before GOOG existed. I then called this elderly oligarch's obvious error a sign of early onset senility on the record ripping the tattered blindfold off lady justice. Oops. Lord Most Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren became angry and made sure all judges on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals or this planet were aware of my "improper" tenor before admitting he was senile a little over one month later. This pornography addicted geezer is no longer an active Senior Status judge. The web of networked "common carrier" wire communications which you referred to as [sic] "nternet" using a capital is not a proper noun.

[sic] "Internet" is not even a proper English word but is a slang term referring to a process and manner of using "common carrier" wires and radios all using time-displaced-modulation of the "common carrier" signals and not using FM alone.

Sound:
When you yell out about how frustrated you are trying to learn all these facts, the air around you is the "common carrier" for sound. A "common carrier" allows signals to pass through itself. In this case; The signal is alternating air-pressures caused by your frustration motivating your vocal chords to shout. The person in another room might hear sound because of pressure differentials bouncing off the walls of the room you are in or may conduct through the walls. Sound waves travel in straight lines at the speed of sound and these usually appear immediate for short distances.

Radio:
When you tell a radio news interviewer about how frustrated you became trying to learn all these new facts, the air around you is the first "common carrier" used for speech. These signals are converted by the microphone into tiny amplitude 20K-20,000Khz EMF signals depending on your voice. These EMF signals are then used to modulate an extremely high power 89-108 Mhz EMF "common carrier" signal by the radio station using frequency modulation or FM.

High power EMF waves then radiate from the radio transmitter like heat in every direction and diminish in strength by 1/distance traveled squared. This law is not why radio stations have limited physical areas for broadcasting and are not why driving several hundred miles will require tuning your FM radio to new local station. The physics explaining this geographical limitation is EMF waves travel only in straight lines on a round earth , -- except through wires.

EMF signals propagate through wires faster than light for the length of the wire because these signals propagate through the wires and do not pass through it like a tube. Charges placed on one end of a wire do not travel from one end to the other but EMF causes the charge to appear to originate from the opposite end. This is why time displaced modulation is possible and is used but not understood by most of even the highly advanced minds using this today.

Commercial radio stations in the U.S. today use almost no time displaced modulation because most radios in the United States are unable to decode this type signal though this modulation manner detection and switching was required by communist China around a decade ago.

Television:
When television signals are broadcast by radio, These generally use VHF or UHF frequencies because the amount of data transmitted is 100's of times over sound only. These, until very recently, only used FM but all those digital converters recognized the time displaced modulation mandated now by the FCC.

FM v Digital:
The amount of data that may be encoded on an FM signal is a linear function of the "common carrier" frequency. Digital or time displaced modulation is exponentially related to the frequency passed through the "common carrier" medium.

Airwaves and "enter-net":
Airwaves and "enternet" are legal fictions created by SCOTUS and nothing more than figures of speech or neologisms with no real definitive scientific definitions. A quart jar on your desk has exactly the same amount of public airwaves as this quart jar sitting on the moon.

The FCC is an agency created in 1934 to replace the Federal Radio Commission to protect both the radio and wire mediums used for EMF signal transmission. This need was explained first with the legal fiction SCOTUS used in FCC v Pacifica in 1978. This was used so the marginally educated masses of America could understand the FCC mission to regulate EMF communications in the "common carrier" of public air shared around us. [sic]"Airwaves" needed to be safe around us like water around all swimmers in a pool need to be safe and sanitary. Any one swimmer urinating in the water "common carrier" harmed the experience of other swimmers whether known or unknown.

Telegraphs:
Telegraphs were first used to send extremely low frequency signals of either opened or closed circuits. These then advanced with Morse code allowing letters to be coded as short and long periods of closed circuits. These exact communications depended on wires and human repetitions of these such that wire communications were extremely accurate and could be used to send money. The world-wide wire communications used with radio also in WWI made Americans realize radios could relay communications perhaps hundreds of miles but when combined with wires would eventually relay communications quickly around the entire planet. Facsimile machines made near immediate telephone transfers of entire pages of text not needing telegraph-machine operators to ensure accuracy.

Common carrier "transmission medium" vs "common carrier"
Calling ISPs "common carriers" was use of a common law term to describe the humans or other human elements affecting the transmission of communications signals using commonly encountered transmission mediums. These mediums might be (solid, liquid, gas, or plasma) but are most definitely not the "wholly unique new medium of worldwide human communications" alleged by SCOTUS in 1997.

The FCC will soon require all publicly accessible computers in schools and libraries to use a safe DNS server like "OpenDNS" or similar. As a "new law", this will be trivial to pass in most states but might need a Congressional or United States Court push to encourage the FCC to wake up and follow U.S. laws already passed decades ago but ignored today.

-----------------------------
The FCC should soon create a replacement fair search engine to replace GOOG immediately and allow sales of advertising thereon to offset taxes and balance the budget. AdSense for Domains is already a deceptive force-feed of unrequested help and is excluded from "OpenDNS" already if required by the administrator.
-----------------------------------

AdBlock Plus is not necessary using "OpenDNS". The plug-in detection and denial JavaScript only requires localization of the JavaScript allowed to run. No honorable website will survive rejecting this plug-in's users.

-----------------------------------
Some might think ICANN "powerful". So were/are the USMC, the US Attorney General, the FCC, Microsoft Corporation, Charter Vista Behavior Healthcare Systems, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, as well as the Fayetteville, AR police. I faced each of these "powerful" entities and have survived thus far and spent only seven days in jail thus far.
---------------------------------
If I need to "cross" ICANN, it will be the last person like me they will ever cross. ICANN legal staff already knows this because I offered to teach them the intricacies of United States and international laws making their very existence questionable after the FCC and the UN completely wake up. I advised ICANN their old lax domain ownership regime was a legal liability. The new regime is a lot better but is still not quite adequate.

The "web" everyone alive under 31 grew up using will soon be safe and will be world-wide for the very first time.

 

[CurtisNeeley]

If you succede in this, you will change "domaining industry"?
Anyone could get their domain back with few simple steps.
If you have software company you clearly have a $100, but you choose harder way of getting domain. Just to prove a point, and not to pay extortion price.

Let me hit you with some knowledge, every time you buy something you are paying extortion price. That's how this world works.

You have a company, trademark, to probably extort money from others. You are not doing it for the better of humanity, you are doing it because of money.
Btw. domain will be availabe for you to register somewhere in October, unless you have some special threatment, and that is if current owner decides not to renew it.

I can't buy the domain and transfer it to my own chosen registrar according to their TOS and this is why I would not consider the $97 offer if I were wealthy.
I will succeed without any question whatsoever. The "domaining industry" makes absolutely nothing and will soon cease to exist.
After ANY bona fide business use today anyone can get their domain back especially if some domainer just saw a domain accidentally dropped by mistakes caused by neglect or even a distressed employee with no existing bona fide plan for use.

I am doing this for the betterment of humanity and am not motivated by money in the least except as a tool to punish Commissioner Ajit Pai, Commissioner Michael O'Reiley, Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation and the U.S. Attorney General.

Why would I need to wait till October if the domain expires July, 25? This might be obvious to domainers. Would you please explain?

 

[timestamp]

Domain lifecycle:
https://archive.icann.org/en/registrars/gtld-lifecycle.jpg

https://www.namepros.com/threads/wh...on-end-date-to-available-registration.849138/

 

[N-A]

I can't buy the domain and transfer it to my own chosen registrar according to their TOS and this is why I would not consider the $97 offer if I were wealthy.

After reading their FAQ (top right of the page), it suggests otherwise.

Can I transfer my domain to a different registrar?
As a proprietary owner you are welcome to transfer the domain as soon as it sixty days old.

I will succeed without any question whatsoever. The "domaining industry" makes absolutely nothing and will soon cease to exist.

News reports of n/cc/s/g/TLD state otherwise, for the time being.

I am doing this for the betterment of humanity and am not motivated by money in the least except as a tool to punish Commissioner Ajit Pai, Commissioner Michael O'Reiley, Google Inc, Microsoft Corporation and the U.S. Attorney General.

It seems like you're doing this more out of angst than anything.

 

[Beezy]

This is performance art trolling, guys.

Good stuff.

 

[Archangel]

I didn't read all of this. But I will register this domain, just-because. Thanks for telling me about it! See you in court