NAMERIFIC stops submitting unregistered Domain nameS!

[Domainerr]

Hello,

Yesterday i tried to submit an unregistrered Domain name to namerific but they stopped the submission of unregistered Domain names, your thoughts?

Regards,
Domainerr

 

[4pm]

so if the error is caused by a single typo why they took long time to fix it?

bugs may live for years until discovered and fixed if they dont generate visible alerts or system faults.

accepting unregged names was all ok until it came to their attention the system is being abused... simple as that

So it is our fault??

it's not a fault.. not your fault.. it's just showing off how (un)moral and (un)fair you are.
as i said thats completely up to you how to deal with other's mistakes - exploit them or help to cure

Brandable Domain names are invented Domain names so it is hard to get registered by someone with in a timeframe..

...a laptop left on a table in a cafe is no one's, why not just take it right? some would take it, some would not.. you would - because "this is not heaven this is earth"



*

 

[NameOmnia]

you are trying your best to criticize us, so if the error is caused by a single typo why they took long time to fix it?



So it is our fault??, this is not heaven this is earth..Even if it is a mistake (submitting unregistered Domain names for review) i registered every single accepted domain names and listed there or in otherwords i didn"t troubled anybody..

Brandable Domain names are invented Domain names so it is hard to get registered by someone with in a timeframe..:bingo:

You can turn the things around as many times as you like but what you did is : unethical, not correct, cheating...call it however you like

 

[Domainerr]

You can turn the things around as many times as you like but what you did is : unethical, not correct, cheating...call it however you like

We sold 5 Domains(Don"t like to mention the names) this way just because i took that chance i don"t know it is ethical or unethical but the result is always positive...

---------- Post added at 12:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:40 PM ----------

it's not a fault.. not your fault.. it's just showing off how (un)moral and (un)fair you are.
as i said thats completely up to you how to deal with other's mistakes - exploit them or help to cure
*

So i am the only guy who found this loophole?...

...a laptop left on a table in a cafe is no one's, why not just take it right? some would take it, some would not.. you would - because "this is not heaven this is earth"



*

This case is entirely different, in my opinion an invented domain name is like a baby in mothers womb. In case of Laptop there is already an owner who bought that stuff and if we took it, this is called stealing..

 

[NameOmnia]

Honestly the fact you don't know if it's ethical or not leaves me speechless again..

@ 4pm : sometimes we can also consider the idea that NR is / was involved too; frankly I don't understand your ongoing apologia ( unless you know something we don't know...)

 

[DU]

i registered every single accepted domain names and listed there or in otherwords i didn"t troubled anybody..

I find it amusing that you all think that acceptance by BrandBucket somehow makes the name worth registering.

thumbs up to DU,Biggie, etc. This is no different than what "Alex" does by spamming expiring and pending delete domains for sale.

You want to live somewhere between the naivete of a baby and the cynicism that I carry.

But there's a truth to be learned - some of your most revered peers do this all the time higher up the food chain. Think for one minute how it is possible to buy a name and flip it in under 5 days.

 

[urlurl]

its not what gets accepted that counts... its what gets sold at the end of the day that matters.

"inventory only has value once it sells"

DP

 

[DU]

you are trying your best to criticize us

You are being called an @sshole. Whether you agree or not is up to you and anyone else reading this thread.

I will say that every post you make you are probably hurting your cause and adding people that support the @sshole theory.

You might want to think carefully about future posts or save people a lot of time and just go with something short and to the point.. like "I'm an @sshole".

I could care less what you do. myself. I don't think it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Where do you draw the line on what's right?

I bet everyone here has offered a stupid low amount for a great domain hoping to take advantage of a moron. Or sold a domain for some stupid overvalued amount to a buyer who's a moron. Look at those who found a stupid dumb pot domain investor and sold him a bunch of reg fee names for XXX and up. Was that ethical?

I could write a novel on the shit domainers do and this unregistered names being sent to Namerific would be pretty low done the list.

But like I said.. sometimes it's better to look stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

 

[NameOmnia]

its not what gets accepted that counts... its what gets sold at the end of the day that matters.

"inventory only has value once it sells"

DP

Yes.

But how long can we go on here ignoring that both what NR and the submitters did IS WRONG???? UNETHICAL???? CHEATING???? Or do we want to keep finding excuses for everything without having the guts to call things by their name?

If NR was aware they are unethical and unprofessional; if they didn't think about checking on names / had a bug they still are unprofessional and untrustworthy.
AND if after all this they didn't warn or ban the accounts of those submitters...how do we want to call it??

I already expressed my opinion about those domainers so I won't repeat it.

---------- Post added at 06:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:49 PM ----------

You are being called an @sshole. Whether you agree or not is up to you and anyone else reading this thread.

I will say that every post you make you are probably hurting your cause and adding people that support the @sshole theory.

You might want to think carefully about future posts or save people a lot of time and just go with something short and to the point.. like "I'm an @sshole".

I could care less what you do. myself. I don't think it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Where do you draw the line on what's right?

I bet everyone here has offered a stupid low amount for a great domain hoping to take advantage of a moron. Or sold a domain for some stupid overvalued amount to a buyer who's a moron. Look at those who found a stupid dumb pot domain investor and sold him a bunch of reg fee names for XXX and up. Was that ethical?

I could write a novel on the shit domainers do and this unregistered names being sent to Namerific would be pretty low done the list.

But like I said.. sometimes it's better to look stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

jeee...I love this post..thanks!

 

[equity78]

There is another thing here that really needs to be looked at for those who are playing the unregistered game.

Margot and Zane are two people on a planet of 7 billion, if they like a name and list it that is not a guarantee it will sell.

Secondly if they don't still have the confidence in your own ability and register the name. I like Margot and Zane but they are not in control of my portfolio or my strategic thinking. Believe in yourself and if other people like it that's a bonus but don't think, A + B = success, its just one opinion.

 

[NameOffice.]

As i said, I did submit some unregistered names to BrandBucket, (literally maybe 5 - 10 unregistered names) over two years ago (when I was very new to domaining BTW. I still consider myself new.), primarily as a test to see if the site would allow it. I would never want to submit unregistered names because of the risk of losing them. The ethics of it I actually never considered, probably because it was a one time thing. This was never a practice and as Margot can probably attest, I was never one who submitted tons of useless names to the site. I may have submitted 10 names a week or so. And as I read in here, I was never a leader in the amount of listed names, but I was probably up there with the amount of sold ones for short time I was there.

Actually I just logged into my old BB account. When I told Margot to remove all my listings, I had 60 listed names and 20 sold names. Having sold 25% of my listed names in less than 1.5 years (during their beginning years mind you), I'd say it shows I was very selective in what I submitted, since I put research behind the names that I decided to register.

Sorry if you took it the wrong way, but I was never in any practice of doing anything unethical. Submitting the unregistered names was part of my R&D for the plans I had for Brandroot. I was testing tons of stuff. I was actually blown away when some of the unregistered names were accepted. I didn't understand how that was possible or how the name even got through.

Also I am very confused by some people saying that submitting unregistered names will cause your registered names to be denied? Where does this idea come from? I don't think either Margot or Zane would ever be so unprofessional as to deny names only because there are too many to review. That sounds very ridiculous. If anything, it only adds to your wait time. Why would they want to pass up a good name because there are a lot of names to review? Seems like some people are taking this subject extremely overboard. I guess you can argue that it's unethical but bashing anyone for it is quite extreme.

Also, some people do things by mistake, like the creator of this thread, not thinking if the actions are ethical or not. He posted this question very openly, completely unaware of it being unethical to most of you. Obviously he learned something here just as I have. This thread helped shed light on why it is unethical to do such things, so it's a good source for new domainers (like myself, who has only been domaining for a few years.).

Take it easy. Relax.

 

[Domainerr]

You are being called an @sshole. Whether you agree or not is up to you and anyone else reading this thread.

I will say that every post you make you are probably hurting your cause and adding people that support the @sshole theory.

You might want to think carefully about future posts or save people a lot of time and just go with something short and to the point.. like "I'm an @sshole".

I could care less what you do. myself. I don't think it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Where do you draw the line on what's right?

I bet everyone here has offered a stupid low amount for a great domain hoping to take advantage of a moron. Or sold a domain for some stupid overvalued amount to a buyer who's a moron. Look at those who found a stupid dumb pot domain investor and sold him a bunch of reg fee names for XXX and up. Was that ethical?

I could write a novel on the shit domainers do and this unregistered names being sent to Namerific would be pretty low done the list.

But like I said.. sometimes it's better to look stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

You are absolutely right, i can"t draw a line here..To be very frank i never thought this thread will make others angry..its better close this Discussion...

Regards,
Domainerr

 

[Cyphix]

No idea why there were accepted in the first place, but very glad to hear they are rejected now. Now maybe they won't have so many domains to go through an domains submitted by people that actually own them can get them reviewed faster.

 

[Kate]

Simply put, they don't verify ownership either. I could submit domains belonging to other people with a nice BIN (especially people I might not like), then a sale is made and the rightful owner has to handle the mess

 

[Ms Domainer]

You are absolutely right, i can"t draw a line here..To be very frank i never thought this thread will make others angry..its better close this Discussion...

Regards,
Domainerr

*

I think this thread should stay open.

Just sayin'


*

 

[mjnels]

You are being called an @sshole. Whether you agree or not is up to you and anyone else reading this thread.

I will say that every post you make you are probably hurting your cause and adding people that support the @sshole theory.

You might want to think carefully about future posts or save people a lot of time and just go with something short and to the point.. like "I'm an @sshole".

I could care less what you do. myself. I don't think it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Where do you draw the line on what's right?

I bet everyone here has offered a stupid low amount for a great domain hoping to take advantage of a moron. Or sold a domain for some stupid overvalued amount to a buyer who's a moron. Look at those who found a stupid dumb pot domain investor and sold him a bunch of reg fee names for XXX and up. Was that ethical?

I could write a novel on the shit domainers do and this unregistered names being sent to Namerific would be pretty low done the list.

But like I said.. sometimes it's better to look stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

^ voice of reason.

excellent post.. everyone else seems like they're trying to be holier than thou.

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:28 PM ----------

*

I think this thread should stay open.

Just sayin'

oh OK, why?

so you guys can continue to tout how ethical you all are. bleh. get a grip guys and gals. _\|/_

 

[Ms Domainer]

*

Because this thread reveals a lot about our fellow members, and that is useful information.

*

 

[NameOmnia]

^ voice of reason.

excellent post.. everyone else seems like they're trying to be holier than thou.

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:28 PM ----------



oh OK, why?

so you guys can continue to tout how ethical you all are. bleh. get a grip guys and gals. _\|/_

I have well drawn lines for myself; if you don't that's your choice.

 

[equity78]

This is the Namerific Faq, the domain still has to be verified it looks like before anything gets up on the site.

http://www.namerific.com/sellerhelp#my-domain-was-approved-how-do-i-verify-i-own-it

 

[Cyphix]

Simply put, they don't verify ownership either. I could submit domains belonging to other people with a nice BIN (especially people I might not like), then a sale is made and the rightful owner has to handle the mess

No you can't...... they require verification that you own it.

 

[mjnels]

*

Because this thread reveals a lot about our fellow members, and that is useful information.

*

*
*
*

oh, right... silly me. here, ill add some strange stars to every post.

*
*
*