rrsae said:
hmmm...that is wrong IMO, so if my name was michael jordan i couldnt reg
www.michaeljordan.ext only because i would have been unlucky enough to be contemporary with the NBA™ star ?
Well you've introduced a new element that was not being discussed in the OP's question, as I assume the OP's name is not "MSharapova".
So, on that level alone, your point is misapplied (Decent Straw-Man attempt, however.).
Secondly, you still do not have free reign to register and do with what you want a site that shares a common name and is likely to be confusingly similar to that of the celebrity. As Dave mentioned, you CAN register whatever you want, such as ThisIsMicrosoftsOfficialWebsiteRightHere.com , but that doesn't mean you wouldn't be in trouble through UDRP or ACPA.
So let's view it from the UDRP aspect:
1) Complainant has TM rights (Yes in either scenario)
2) Respondent has no legitimate interest (Debatable in either scenario, more likely to have legitimate interest if it is your name, of cours

)
3) Registered and being used in bad faith (Could be true in either scenario - having the same name does not mean that you
can't exhibit bad faith.)
Anyhow, so it's not, "not true" - by any stretch of the imagination.
-Allan