NameSilo

.tv Missed out on 500.com? Get 500.tv

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

cambkey

Established Member
Impact
8
Premium name! 500.com just sold for $40K

memorable NNN

Outstanding development opportunities:
Indy.500.tv
Fortune.500.tv
Top.500.tv
Daytona.500.tv
etc etc

£500 premium reg fees paid for 2 years (vast majority of NNN.tv are $750 p.a)

Don't miss out. PM with sensible offers.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Equity78 and I have been through the LLL list quite heavily looking to see what gems might be had, but not the NNN list. Good find! Hope you backed out of the shopping cart to get the 10% discount...
 
0
•••
gotta love that discount Westblock! What $range value do you think for this domain? (anyone else have a view too?)
 
0
•••
I wouldn't pay more than $10K for this.
Nice name
 
0
•••
cambkey said:
gotta love that discount Westblock! What $range value do you think for this domain? (anyone else have a view too?)
I am still struggling with the overpriced yearly registration of Premium .TV names - regardless of the potential. Dealing with the premiums and rolling the dice that the exact perfect end user will need/want the name AND understand/accept the business expense of $500+ yearly renewal fees is a real challenge. I would venture to say that most businesses are too conditioned to see domain renewals between $6-$30 to just accept a 8,500% increase without a second thought or hesitation.

I think the NNN.tv's are pretty universal and potentially a better gamble (read 111.tv) than the LLL.tv names as a pure speculative move. With any premium, I think the best gamble is for niche targeted development rather than pure speculation and waiting for that perfect end user to materialize.

Good Luck! %%-
 
0
•••
Chappy said:
I wouldn't pay more than $10K for this.
Nice name

was that an offer, Chappy? :blink:
 
0
•••

We're social

Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back