- Impact
- 21
WHAT WILL THE PRICE FOR THE WORST LLLL.com BE IN JAN 2009


holyroller said:In my view this is just a boom made by domainer greed, (as with all booms). When it hits the top, which it will, there is only one way. I would be surprized if the market held out that long.
If the market slows and reaches the top, why would anyone consider buying them as an investment.
If (and I say if) the market does bomb,its not a question of value, you just won't be able to sell em :lol:
These critters have real value which will be fully realized at increasingly stable (but still steadily increasing) prices about 5 years from now (IMO). Speculation may fuel some spectacularly volatile market action in the meantime, with ups and downs possibly of 50% within relatively short periods of time occuring over the next year or two. Long-term buyers are going to keep accumulating as much as they can for the big payoff years from now, and will be glad they did. Quick flippers are going to be moving in and back out of the market without the solid conviction to hold for the long term - and without that "faith" they are going to be more susceptible to panic selling (as well as "panic buying").holyroller said:In my view this is just a boom made by domainer greed, (as with all booms). When it hits the top, which it will, there is only one way. I would be surprized if the market held out that long.
If the market slows and reaches the top, why would anyone consider buying them as an investment.
If (and I say if) the market does bomb,its not a question of value, you just won't be able to sell em :lol:
Remember we are talking about the worst LLLL.com domains here.filter said:These critters have real value which will be fully realized at increasingly stable (but still steadily increasing) prices about 5 years from now (IMO). Speculation may fuel some spectacularly volatile market action in the meantime, with ups and downs possibly of 50% within relatively short periods of time occuring over the next year or two. Long-term buyers are going to keep accumulating as much as they can for the big payoff years from now, and will be glad they did. Quick flippers are going to be moving in and back out of the market without the solid conviction to hold for the long term - and without that "faith" they are going to be more susceptible to panic selling (as well as "panic buying").
But the real full-blown mania of people buying into a truly speculative bubble is still probably at least a few years away. What we're seeing right now is - believe it or not - probably still very much the early stages with lots of mini-bubbles floating on the surface of a strong current in a micro-market. LLLL.com are still substantially undervalued compared to LLL.com and even CCC.com ...
:imho:
holyroller said:Remember we are talking about the worst LLLL.com domains here.
Im not 100% convinced by this argument to be honest. Im not sure how you can say a domain is undervalued when a lot of the worst LLLL.com domains have no real value other than from rarity. They have limited chance of making an income undeveloped and no real end user, so they are mearly changing hands between domainers. Yes its true the bubble could go on for a while yet, or it could end tomorrow, that is the nature of the beast, you never really know when it will end. As for prediciting 5 years from now, who knows what will happen then, perhaps we will just be hitting the bottom of the recession, perhaps the boom will continue.
To be honest, I'm not 100% convinced either! My gut tells me it's a 60/40 odds bet right now with a 1000% payoff on the upside. So I'll take those odds gladly - it's a nice risk/reward ratio - but won't be betting the farm on it either ....holyroller said:Remember we are talking about the worst LLLL.com domains here.
Im not 100% convinced by this argument to be honest. Im not sure how you can say a domain is undervalued when a lot of the worst LLLL.com domains have no real value other than from rarity.
Maybe no obvious big money end-user knocking on my door right now, but definitely quite a few folks such as myself who like short domain names, and are tickled pink to now have a nice collection of funky little domains such as XVQT or whatever for their own use. Not concerned with (and frankly am happy not to have to worry about) traditional domaining revenue from PPC - though I do get some pleasant surprises every now and then from that too.holyroller said:They have limited chance of making an income undeveloped and no real end user, so they are mearly changing hands between domainers.
That is the nature of a bubble. But this is not (yet) a bubble. When or if it actually becomes one, I'll be one of many long-term investors waiting for the aftermath to pick up some more nice pieces dumped by panicked speculators - looking forward to the steadier long-term growth yet to come.holyroller said:Yes its true the bubble could go on for a while yet, or it could end tomorrow, that is the nature of the beast, you never really know when it will end.
No one knows for sure, of course - but some outcomes are much more likely than others.holyroller said:As for prediciting 5 years from now, who knows what will happen then, perhaps we will just be hitting the bottom of the recession, perhaps the boom will continue.
Everyone knows the answer to this one, but no one wants to face the fact that it could happen for LLLL.com...italiandragon said:maybe you should ask why you can`t get ZXQ.com or YKZ.com or JQX.com for less than $7,000 ?
Etab said:January 2009 is only 10.5 months away. I'd be very surprised if they reach into three figures minimum in less than a year.
Until end users buy ZWKQ or JXBD, I'm not convinced they'll hold any value. The value of short domains are often artificially inflated by domainers who buy and sell to each other for an increasing amount of money. They'll hold "value" for a little while, but when people stop selling these (once they're in the domainers' hands), I predict they'll lose a lot of real value. Isn't that what happened to LLL .us? I know -- apples and oranges in terms of comparing the names themselves, but it's the same idea. :imho:


