Hello everyone ,
Is .live good for investment ? please share your opinions about .live .. thank you.
Is .live good for investment ? please share your opinions about .live .. thank you.
^ it means whatever you want it to mean.
i think it's not about you, or what you want it to mean.... it's about each pair of eyes who looks at it and how they interpret it.
particularly when there is potential for confusion.
imo...
Simple. Why .live and not .online?In other words, a potential buyer will tell you that he can register a similar extension for his project. This is an issue for a large number of new gtld's.
news.live is available, Registry Premium Domain $60,000
The grammar is wrong. I'm not sure why News.Live is premium. I'd like to prefer Live.News.
It's different. You can not compare verb extension and cctld extension .CA is country code geo domain. News.CA is perfect. News in Canada. Live.News is also perfect combination. Live News. Not for News.Live.GTLDs should build reputation and image around them, so it does not have to be in the correct order ... for example news.ca is good for Canadians familiar with the .ca extension as a trusted extension for Canadian websites..
...although I agree with your logic, I don't think it is valid regarding this extension
Also, instead of being negative why not being positive?
I just love .live extensions
If you go by sales history on NameBio, it's a terrible investment:
https://namebio.com/?s==cTN2cDN4kTM
Fans of new gTLDs will tell you the extension is a future investment that is likely to grow in popularity, but they are only guessing. Until someone can show you data of consistent sales and end user use in this (or any) new TLD extension, they really are best to avoid unless you know what you're buying.
The only users on this forum who seem to have any experience in selling new TLDs are @Fancy.domains and @kerala. They might be able to give you a more informed answer.