Dynadot — .com Transfer

information .LINK binge progress

SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

BoGoKing

Top Member
Impact
3,344
Sorry to have to start another thread regarding .LINK, but i wasn't able to answer questions "if" there was a "link" of any kind in the text of the post/message I was responding to.

I was able to hand register slightly more than a thousand names with about 20 of them being "Premium" names that sold for $116 each, and one that I purchased for $478, the corresponding .com is valued at $8,800,000.

Since a host of individuals have confirmed that, ".LINK is no worse than .XYZ", I just knew .link was a good alternative to .com and a good rival for .xyz :xf.wink:

Curious anyone? Lets have some fun(y)
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
His plan is to single-handedly alter global awareness and perception of .link (and .online, and .homes), thereby creating a surge in demand for his non-premium, multi-word, new TLD names.

So, you know, it shouldn't be too difficult.
"single-handedly"??? Au Contriare Mon Frere :xf.wink:
 
0
•••
2
•••
It's been four years ago that I visited a friends "charity" site; PingPong.gives that i learned an unbelievable website can be developed behind an extension like .gives and yes, .link.....whoda thunk:xf.wink:MAD, i know for a FACT this charity raises over 100K a year for diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.
What did they pay for their domain name?
 
2
•••
What did they pay for their domain name?
I'm guessing you went to the site to see what i was referring to? I don't know what they paid for PingPong.gives, but again you missed the point Joe. Like our friend Mad About Domains said, ".link does exactly the same as .com" You need only replace the the .link with .gives and you get the same result.

I know you're doing your best to discredit me Joe, but you should know by now it's a hard job. My advice to you is to try and be a bit more open minded. Don't you just envy the opportunity I have to teach potential "end users" just how fu*ked up the domain industry truly is.....and to think I have Verisign on my side :unsure:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I'm guessing you went to the site to see what i was referring to? I don't know what they paid for PingPong.gives, but again you missed the point Joe. Like our friend Mad About Domains said, ".link does exactly the same as .com" You need only replace the the .link with .gives and you get the same result.
:unsure:

".hiphop does exactly the same as .link" You need only replace the the .hiphop with .link and you get the same result.
 
2
•••
Like our friend Mad About Domains said, ".link does exactly the same as .com" You need only replace the the .link with .gives and you get the same result.
I repeated what you said and gave caveats to it.
 
2
•••
".hiphop does exactly the same as .link" You need only replace the the .hiphop with .link and you get the same result.
Duh:xf.rolleyes:....is that all you got Mon Frere:xf.wink:
 
0
•••
I repeated what you said and gave caveats to it.

I repeated what you said and gave caveats to it.
MAD....i can tell you're rather intrigued by all this. The FACT that you and a few more of my critics have acknowledged there's zero technical difference between .link and .com speaks volumes. Just a quick story how buying TossUp.link led me to hand registering TossUpSports(.)com and TossUpCasino(.)com. Now this might not be a big deal to you across the pond, but it's my opinion these two domains are worth six figures apiece. Last i checked there's probably more money in sports and entertainment/gambling then there is in healthcare.....what do you think MAD?
 
0
•••
I'm guessing you went to the site to see what i was referring to? I don't know what they paid for PingPong.gives, but again you missed the point Joe. Like our friend Mad About Domains said, ".link does exactly the same as .com" You need only replace the the .link with .gives and you get the same result.

I know you're doing your best to discredit me Joe, but you should know by now it's a hard job. My advice to you is to try and be a bit more open minded. Don't you just envy the opportunity I have to teach potential "end users" just how fu*ked up the domain industry truly is.....and to think I have Verisign on my side :unsure:
It's actually you who missed the point: it doesn't matter that they do the same thing. As a domain investor (which you are), all that matters is what someone will pay you for your names. I'm glad the ping pong site worked out well, but I bet that charity paid reg fee for their domain name.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
.HIPHOP is no worse than .LINK

;)

Brad
 
Last edited:
1
•••
a lot of these 2 worders are bad investments even at $2 imo.

get a refund on millennial news and those types.
 
3
•••
.link is way worse than .com

make sure your word to the left of the dot works with the word to the right of the dot.

as far as .link goes, are you using it for short for hyperlink? like you are giving someone a hyperlink to a website? .to is nicer for this.
 
2
•••
.link is way worse than .com

make sure your word to the left of the dot works with the word to the right of the dot.

as far as .link goes, are you using it for short for hyperlink? like you are giving someone a hyperlink to a website? .to is nicer for this.
Maybe you'll understand this a little better;

Link in Bio

"Perhaps the most significant opportunity for .link is to take advantage of the market for “link in bio” services. Users of many social media platforms use these services to link out to their online destinations: other social media pages, websites, etc.

It’s a big market. LinkTree, just one of many large competitors in the space, has 27 million users.

TechCrunch in an article about LinkTree’s latest funding round (valuing it at $1.3 billion), “Who would’ve thought that an entire swath of startups would spring up all because Instagram, TikTok and Twitter only let you link to one website in your bio?”

Users of these services end up with a subdomain or, worse, a subdirectory on the main domain of these services.

.Link would like to partner with link in bio services to let them offer second level .link domains instead. It also sees opportunity with link shorteners.

With .link sold exclusively through registrars, this could create an opportunity for the company’s registrars.

.Link also wants registrars to rethink the typical onboarding of customers. Today, the typical flow is that someone registers a domain to create a website. This involves a lot of work, even though website-building platforms have made it much easier in recent years. There’s a reason people decide to just create a Facebook page instead of a website.

What if registrars helped customers establish a simple web presence with a link in bio page?

“I think link in bio is going to be even bigger than websites as a whole, as a category,” Belousov said. “People thought everybody would have a blog. But instead, everybody has a Twitter account, right? Why? Because it’s way easier. And it’s kind of like a micro-level version of a blog. So the link in bio thing is, in my opinion, the same thing to websites as a Twitter account is to blogs.”

Liley pointed out that a link in bio account is a low-friction entry point for new customers. Registrars that onboard customers with a service like this could then upsell other products and services.

“In a nutshell, we would like to see .link become the de facto standard in anything link-related,” Liley said. “So that could be link in bio. It can be link shorteners and branded links.”

The company does not plan to offer competing services to link in bio and shorteners but instead to supply them with .link domains through registrars."

Link in Bio

Perhaps the most significant opportunity for .link is to take advantage of the market for “link in bio” services. Users of many social media platforms use these services to link out to their online destinations: other social media pages, websites, etc.

It’s a big market. LinkTree, just one of many large competitors in the space, has 27 million users.

TechCrunch in an article about LinkTree’s latest funding round (valuing it at $1.3 billion), “Who would’ve thought that an entire swath of startups would spring up all because Instagram, TikTok and Twitter only let you link to one website in your bio?”

Users of these services end up with a subdomain or, worse, a subdirectory on the main domain of these services.

.Link would like to partner with link in bio services to let them offer second level .link domains instead. It also sees opportunity with link shorteners.

With .link sold exclusively through registrars, this could create an opportunity for the company’s registrars.

.Link also wants registrars to rethink the typical onboarding of customers. Today, the typical flow is that someone registers a domain to create a website. This involves a lot of work, even though website-building platforms have made it much easier in recent years. There’s a reason people decide to just create a Facebook page instead of a website.

What if registrars helped customers establish a simple web presence with a link in bio page?

“I think link in bio is going to be even bigger than websites as a whole, as a category,” Belousov said. “People thought everybody would have a blog. But instead, everybody has a Twitter account, right? Why? Because it’s way easier. And it’s kind of like a micro-level version of a blog. So the link in bio thing is, in my opinion, the same thing to websites as a Twitter account is to blogs.”

Liley pointed out that a link in bio account is a low-friction entry point for new customers. Registrars that onboard customers with a service like this could then upsell other products and services.

“In a nutshell, we would like to see .link become the de facto standard in anything link-related,” Liley said. “So that could be link in bio. It can be link shorteners and branded links.”

The company does not plan to offer competing services to link in bio and shorteners but instead to supply them with .link domains through registrars.
 
0
•••
It's actually you who missed the point: it doesn't matter that they do the same thing. As a domain investor (which you are), all that matters is what someone will pay you for your names. I'm glad the ping pong site worked out well, but I bet that charity paid reg fee for their domain name.
Joe....regardless of who missed the point, "end users" could give a rats arse what you think, and so could i :xf.rolleyes:

I get it....you'd opt for yourself or recommend to your client to pay $75,000 for DomainConsulting.com instead of $750 to $7,500 for DomainConsulting.link that according to you and everyone else in the domain industry does the exact same thing:xf.rolleyes:
 
0
•••
MAD....i can tell you're rather intrigued by all this. The FACT that you and a few more of my critics have acknowledged there's zero technical difference between .link and .com speaks volumes. Just a quick story how buying TossUp.link led me to hand registering TossUpSports(.)com and TossUpCasino(.)com. Now this might not be a big deal to you across the pond, but it's my opinion these two domains are worth six figures apiece. Last i checked there's probably more money in sports and entertainment/gambling then there is in healthcare.....what do you think MAD?
Unfortunately "toss" has negative connotations here across the pond. It's essentially rude... We call people tosspots, tossers so it wouldn't be my first choice, even if tossup is a flip of a coin. It would end up being called tossersports or something once people start losing their hard earned money.
 
1
•••
Joe....regardless of who missed the point, "end users" could give a rats arse what you think, and so could i :xf.rolleyes:

I get it....you'd opt for yourself or recommend to your client to pay $75,000 for DomainConsulting.com instead of $750 to $7,500 for DomainConsulting.link that according to you and everyone else in the domain industry does the exact same thing:xf.rolleyes:
Actually, I'd recommend that they either:
  1. Pay up for the .com to secure the organic traffic, the brand protection, and the authority; or
  2. Pay less for the ccTLD to get the same as the above on a smaller scale; or
  3. Pay registration fee for one of the dozens of new generic TLDs that work with the name, because they all do the exact same thing.
Get it now?
 
0
•••
The FACT that you and a few more of my critics have acknowledged there's zero technical difference between .link and .com speaks volumes.
Rich, everyone acknowledges that. It's a commonly known fact. Stop beating the poor straw man dead horse.

What's incomprehensible to me is that after 5 years doing this, you still haven't figured out why .com sells more volume for higher prices, and why only premium (usually short, single-word) terms have any value in new TLD extensions.
 
3
•••
Regarding link in bio, it's an idea but I would think that for it to have any significance it would need to be a well known domain that screams "this is a site containing many links". People recognise that linktr.ee and others are a link to other links in a consistent format.

So the circumstance that we need is that people either recognise a single .link domain or a the entire extension as the source for useful grouped links (links.link or .links for it to make more sense). The former, fine, the latter... Less likely because everyone would need to create their own site, or pay for hosting or have some technical know-how to point their domain to a service that provides the service simply.

The whole beauty of linktr.ee is it's consistency and ease of creation... I feel It wouldn't have succeeded if it weren't for these key ingredients.

You're right that it is a phenomenon born out of restrictions of other services but the ship had sailed imho.
 
0
•••
I have not read this whole thread.

Richard... you seriously need to STOP buying domains and purchase a NameBio subscription.

You can also read through Reported Domain Sales thread or see DNJournal.
 
2
•••
I have not read this whole thread.

Richard... you seriously need to STOP buying domains and purchase a NameBio subscription.

You can also read through a domain sales thread or see DNJournal.
Oh sir....I've had a Namebio subscription for years and i also follow domain sales. My real strength is being able to read between the lines :xf.wink:
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back