Based on the commission framework they've outlined, it seems domain holders will LTO their assets at their own risk. This means it's up to them to keep tabs on how the domain is being used and take whatever action they deem necessary if it's misused. Ultimately, this would imply a domain holder would need to set use terms in place before a LTO agreement is established; which would mean having some form of reliable contact with the leasing party. Considering GoDaddy likely won't provide the customer's contact information, the domain holder might find themselves out of luck if the value of the domain is diminished during the LTO term.
In a perfect world, GoDaddy would monitor how LTO domains are used; but they'll likely leave that to ICANN and others to deal with. They're probably fine with being called on to pull the plug on a domain's LTO dynamic at the request of their "overhead". Afterall, GoDaddy's goals probably don't expand too far beyond maximizing profits at every turn. Ensuring the integrity of domain use probably wouldn't benefit their bottom-line enough for there to be a strong investment in a system that would allow a domain holder to withdraw from a LTO agreement if their asset is being misused. Then, you have the censorship issue that would be exacerbated if a system like this did exist.
It's ALL interesting to say the least....
Mel
QUAD Domains