question Is ghost brokering and 25x markups the norm for VIPs?

[Stoneweight]

I’m new here but not new to the business. I'm looking to pick up more names in the niche, but a recent public thread has me wondering about the standards on this board.

I’m looking for a reality check from the pros on a few things:

First, is it normal for VIPs to pitch names they don't actually own or have any authority over?

Second, I was quoted a firm 80k for a name that’s currently on a public lander for 3k. When I pointed it out, the seller claimed it was just a cache error.

Finally, when the price gap became obvious, the seller just started calling me a bot to avoid the conversation.

I have the budget to buy high-tier assets, but I’m not here to get played by middlemen who treat a 3k name like a lottery ticket. If you want to see the exchange I’m talking about, just check my post history for the core thread.

Is this how business is usually done here, or did I just find a bad actor?

 

[boker]

To pull off the 'scam' you’re imagining, I wouldn't just need to be a 'kid' with a laptop. I would need to be a one-man corporate conglomerate.

To make this all come together as you've described, I would need to be:

• A Fortune Teller: To identify 'Category King' niches years before the mainstream—and tech giants—even knew they existed.
• A Brand Strategist: To architect an entire lifestyle ecosystem across multiple domains instead of just flipping names for a quick $50..
• An Intelligence Officer: To coordinate 'Ghost Brokering' maneuvers and shell-company acquisitions without leaving a single verifiable trail for you to find.
• A Venture Capitalist: To maintain the high-conviction capital required to ignore the 'Small Fish' noise and hold these assets for the long game.
• A Media & Publishing Mogul: Someone with the reach to seed global narratives, ensuring these trends didn't just stay in a forum, but trended globally across every major platform.
• A Fashion Creative Director: A visionary capable of taking what you call a 'COVID trend' and transforming it into a permanent, multi-billion dollar lifestyle.

THAT IS SOME 5D CHESS

Honestly, you guys give me too much credit. You're turning me into some kind of domaining folk hero, a ghost in the machine that's outsmarting the 'Established Members' while eating a bowl of cereal.

The reality is much simpler. I use Grammarly to keep my writing sharp because I value professional clarity.

If you want to find the 'bot' that's outsmarting you, Grammarly has 40 million users. I suggest you ask them for a list and start your search there.

Or download Grammarly and start your own billion-dollar trends that expand worldwide. It must be that simple, right?

No, you just need to be a newbie who registered a few core domains and who now wants to cash out quickly, without waiting for an end user. Even the one's asking for adventurecore and a few others, a fraction of your budget, they have a hard time selling. Probably you will find an end user for 2k or so for each in a few years time, but this is not the right time or the right place. You don't need to use ai for every reply, we can understand you fine, even if you are a kid or a 100 years guy.

 

[NickB]

Oh you sweet sweet troll....

You remind me of the tale of the three billy goats gruff.....

Why the troll is considered foolish

From a folklorist’s perspective, the troll’s foolishness is structural, not comedic:

Greed overrides judgement
The troll repeatedly delays action in pursuit of a “better” reward.

Failure to learn
Despite two identical encounters, he does not adapt his behaviour.

Misreading power
Trolls in Norse folklore are strong but poor judges of intelligence and strategy—this is a recurring theme.

Liminal blindness
As a bridge-dweller (a liminal being), the troll is bound to his role and cannot think beyond it.

In Norwegian tradition, trolls are often physically dominant but mentally rigid—dangerous, yet ultimately outwitted by patience and foresight.

 

[Stoneweight]

No, you just need to be a newbie who registered a few core domains and who now wants to cash out quickly, without waiting for an end user. Even the one's asking for adventurecore and a few others, a fraction of your budget, they have a hard time selling. Probably you will find an end user for 2k or so for each in a few years time, but this is not the right time or the right place. You don't need to use ai for every reply, we can understand you fine, even if you are a kid or a 100 years guy.

You’ve decided I’m just a 'newbie' who registered a few domains and now wants to 'cash out quickly.' But to pull off what you’re describing, the global trend-casting, the category-building, the silent acquisitions, I would need more than a laptop and a dream.

How can I be both a lucky newbie and a domaining mastermind? Make it make sense..

 

[Stoneweight]

Oh you sweet sweet troll....

You remind me of the tale of the three billy goats gruff.....

Why the troll is considered foolish

From a folklorist’s perspective, the troll’s foolishness is structural, not comedic:

Greed overrides judgement
The troll repeatedly delays action in pursuit of a “better” reward.

Failure to learn
Despite two identical encounters, he does not adapt his behaviour.

Misreading power
Trolls in Norse folklore are strong but poor judges of intelligence and strategy—this is a recurring theme.

Liminal blindness
As a bridge-dweller (a liminal being), the troll is bound to his role and cannot think beyond it.

In Norwegian tradition, trolls are often physically dominant but mentally rigid—dangerous, yet ultimately outwitted by patience and foresight.

It’s a charming story, Nick. But you’ve misread the roles.

In your version of the Three Billy Goats Gruff, you see yourself as the clever goat crossing the bridge to 'greener pastures.' But in the world of high-capital domaining, you aren’t the goat. You are the villager standing on the shore, watching a Category King build the bridge you’re too afraid to walk on.

You call me a troll because I’m a 'bridge-dweller.' I accept the title. Because a bridge is the only way to the future, and I’m the one who owns MY deeds.

If you want to reach the 'green grass,' you’re going to have to stop telling fairy tales and start looking at the data.

 

[Future Sensors]

Whatever you are, you're draining a ridiculous amount of our brain cycles. So what's the plan from here.

 

[boker]

You’ve decided I’m just a 'newbie' who registered a few domains and now wants to 'cash out quickly.' But to pull off what you’re describing, the global trend-casting, the category-building, the silent acquisitions, I would need more than a laptop and a dream.

How can I be both a lucky newbie and a domaining mastermind? Make it make sense..

Category killer is just in your mind. They are just a few hand regs that could or could not sell for a couple of thousands, we are all regging this kind of domains daily. It's nice to dream, the hard thing will be the landing.

 

[boker]

Whatever you are, you're draining a ridiculous amount of our brain cycles. So what's the plan from here.

He is a mastermind with unlimited budget and unlimited time...He will give up when he will be ignored or he will find another place to play. Ultimately, when he will grow up.

 

[Stoneweight]

Whatever you are, you're draining a ridiculous amount of our brain cycles. So what's the plan from here.

I’ll be direct. You’re 'drained' because you are witnessing the death of your own business model in real-time.

There is a term for what is happening here: Legacy Gatekeeping. You have spent years mastering a world of small-scale, manual transactions. It’s a comfortable museum where everyone follows the same 'standard' rules.

Then, when someone enters who doesn't play by those rules, your brain is trying to reconcile two conflicting facts:

1. The Competency Gap: You believe I am a 'foolish kid' with a Canva account, yet you cannot explain how I am consistently ahead of the curve. You are mistaking my efficiency for lack of experience.
2. The Narrative Shift: You are watching the market move from simple keyword flipping to high-conviction architecture. You can't stop watching because, deep down, you realize the territory you ignored is exactly where the value has migrated.

If you want your 'brain cycles' back, stop acting like a Legacy Gatekeeper. You can either adapt to high-conviction architecture or continue narrating the decline of the manual flip.

 

[Stoneweight]

Category killer is just in your mind. They are just a few hand regs that could or could not sell for a couple of thousands, we are all regging this kind of domains daily. It's nice to dream, the hard thing will be the landing.

Every domain on earth is a hand-reg. The "Register" button is the same for everyone, but it doesn't equalize strategy. The difference isn't in how the name was registered; it’s in the conviction and foresight behind the choice.

• Real Estate Logic: A plot of dirt in a desert and a plot in downtown Manhattan are both "just land" until you look at the map. I’m not dreaming of a sale; I’m architecting a lifestyle.
• Architecture over Luck: While you’re regging daily hoping for a "couple of thousand" on a lucky hit, I’m building the infrastructure for a multi-billion dollar vertical. I’m not waiting for a "landing"; I’ve already built the runway.
• The Obsession: If these names are just "trash," you wouldn't be "drained" by this conversation. You can’t stop watching because you recognize the shift toward High-Conviction Architecture, even if you won't admit it.

We aren't playing the same game. You’re hunting for lottery tickets; I’m buying the convenience store.

 

[boker]

Every domain on earth is a hand-reg. The "Register" button is the same for everyone, but it doesn't equalize strategy. The difference isn't in how the name was registered; it’s in the conviction and foresight behind the choice.

• Real Estate Logic: A plot of dirt in a desert and a plot in downtown Manhattan are both "just land" until you look at the map. I’m not dreaming of a sale; I’m architecting a lifestyle.
• Architecture over Luck: While you’re regging daily hoping for a "couple of thousand" on a lucky hit, I’m building the infrastructure for a multi-billion dollar vertical. I’m not waiting for a "landing"; I’ve already built the runway.
• The Obsession: If these names are just "trash," you wouldn't be "drained" by this conversation. You can’t stop watching because you recognize the shift toward High-Conviction Architecture, even if you won't admit it.

We aren't playing the same game. You’re hunting for lottery tickets; I’m buying the convenience store.

I remember how nice was when I were a kid, I could dream all day.

 

[Stoneweight]

I remember how nice was when I were a kid, I could dream all day.

In behavioral psychology, this is known as Infantilization. When a Legacy Gatekeeper faces a strategic shift they can't technically dismantle, they often resort to 'kid' metaphors to patronize the source. It’s a standard defense mechanism designed to regain a sense of superiority when the actual market data becomes too 'draining' to process.

You’re trying to turn a billion-dollar category shift into a nursery rhyme because it’s easier than admitting you missed the boat on High-Conviction Architecture.

While you’re busy 'dreaming' about the past, I’m busy owning the infrastructure of the future. You can call it a dream all you want, but the runway is already built, High-Conviction Architectures have taken off, and you're still in the lobby complaining about the ticket prices.

You can either study the blueprint of the new market or spend your time cataloging the relics of the old one.

 

[jberryhill]

My team has documented this attempt at identity solicitation and we are weighing legal options.

 

[alop]

Show attachment 294434

let's congratulate to they team

 

[Stoneweight]

Show attachment 294434

I cannot post a detailed response in a public forum regarding the specific security concerns currently being handled. If you are familiar with the instances of identity impersonation and data solicitation that have occurred here, and if you have consulted with the moderation team, you will understand exactly why I cannot discuss the details of that evidence in this space.

 

[biggie]

Hi

at first it was simple, to just give a perspective
now, too deep to fathom the objective

keyword > market data
I’ve seen it thrown out by another
an all knowing, forever with the comeback
a perpetual blank convo, void of purpose beyond engagement…
is it learning or are we being taught?

imo..

 

[Stoneweight]

let's congratulate to they team

thank you! my team appreciates it!

 

[jberryhill]

I cannot post a detailed response in a public forum regarding the specific security concerns currently being handled.

You apparently can't read what's in the image either, bot.

 

[Stoneweight]

You apparently can't read what's in the image either, bot.

John, your shift from citing legal credentials to using 'bot' as a playground insult suggests that the professional portion of this conversation is over.

If your intent was to use your reputation to intimidate me into silence, it has failed. I have no interest in engaging with a professional who resorts to name-calling when faced with a perspective they don't understand.

Because you are an attorney, your words carry a different weight and responsibility. I am officially asking you to stop addressing me or my posts.

 

[jberryhill]

John, your shift from citing legal credentials [...]

My shift from what? What are you talking about? Who was "citing legal credentials" in this discussion at any point?

This is the problem with being prone to hallucinations, bot.

I am officially asking you to stop addressing me or my posts.

Oh, you are "officially asking" me?

Don't you need the whole team for an "official" asking?

 

[jberryhill]

Whatever you are, you're draining a ridiculous amount of our brain cycles. So what's the plan from here.

He's applying to Wong Tai Chew for a full time job.