- Impact
- 4
Is dot Com king forever or all going to change after ICANN shake domain industry next year?
New internet domain names in 2009: ICANN
New internet domain names in 2009: ICANN
I have not seen any evidence of that happening so faryilduz said:Thor could kick Jesus' ass.
raredn.com said:Except Jesus
Both very good points.scandiman said:Forever is a very long time
In America I can see this being the case in general, especially with established brands. I don't think I will live to see the day that ESPN will switch from .com to .biz. .Mobi is slightly different in that some established brands are using it for their mobile web naming convention. But still we're not going to wake up one day and find ESPN.com redirecting to ESPN.mobi when browsed on the PC.thedomainsella said:.Com has been the web standard since Al Gore created the internet.
To even speculate the probability of .com losing its "King" title in the United States during the next 50 years (or at least until the baby boomers and Gen Y are gone) is absurd.
Take a look at this list of every available TLD. Although many look promising, the reality is: the general public simply won't adapt to the widespread use (at least not enough to overtake "The King") of these TLDs.
That's not to say that these new TLDs won't be profitable... it's just that in this battle of David v. Goliath, Goliath (.com) WILL win.
Etab said:Both very good points.
IMHO, as long as we have the current domain name system we have now, .com will be king. It will only be unseated if/when we lose extensions completely.
.Com has age on its side. It has familiarity from every Internet user.
I've heard people argue that .web would be a better alternative than .com, which is "supposed" to mean "commercial." If you ask me, www.address.web sounds like something that would come out of the Department of Redundancy Department -- if we're using "www" to mean "world wide web" and we have "web" as the extension, you're making an unnecessary repetition.

