"Dot-com is king," Goldberger said. "Dot-net is worthless."
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/w...ul15,0,5859427.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/w...ul15,0,5859427.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork


domainspade said:Im sure im going to draw some fire for my comments, but here they are.
Hes 95% right. - .com is still the brand to build on. With some circumstances existing (like a non-profit on .org). Unless you have a strong generic in most other TLD's odds are your going to have a difficult time selling it to the end-user.
Let the hate PM's begin...
Justin
domainspade said:Im sure im going to draw some fire for my comments, but here they are.
Hes 95% right. - .com is still the brand to build on. With some circumstances existing (like a non-profit on .org). Unless you have a strong generic in most other TLD's odds are your going to have a difficult time selling it to the end-user.
Let the hate PM's begin...
Justin
Ronald Regging said:while i dont think that .nets are worthless... I personally would never attempt to build a serious site with anything other than a .com.
hark said:nuf said!
Ronald Regging said:while i dont think that .nets are worthless... I personally would never attempt to build a serious site with anything other than a .com.
wot said:"Dot-com is king," Goldberger said. "Dot-net is worthless."



