LOL. I can't believe people are arguing about domain lists.
:talk:
i don't see it as an argument, but more like different "expressions of perceptions".
we all may perceive the same event differently, depending on personal preferences, personal loyalties, personal experiences, etc.
the underlying theme is:
these lists are being published by personalities in the industry and as such, these personalities rise to a level of notoriety.
many people who don't know jack from jill, will, typically associate notoriety with knowledge and expertise.
thus or therefore...these lists may typically been seen as premium, just by association of "who" published them, even if "premium" is never used in title or content.
theory example:
if shane, bill or any other blogger in the "agg" put it on a list...
then it must be worthy.
this publicity leads to traffic volume for their respective sites, which in turn leads to more potential revenue for the bloggers from advertisers, etc.
so, in effect they may/are generate/generating revenue while you may stand a chance of losing money, if you buy one of the names on these lists and can't sell it later.
though you are not obligated in any way to read them, the constant promotions by others trying to "latch" on to their (bloggers)notoriety, so they in turn can climb the same ladder.
(maybe we can talk about ladder climbing later)
to some extent the higher the blogger is elevated in the eyes of other domainers, the more accountable they should be to those they came up off of.
these lists can be seen as a form of paying it forward on the part of the blogger, but when/as you pay forward are you also skimping at the same time?
and i think that may be what some are alluding to.
from my perspective, from reading this thread and from watching in the cut ....