

I'm frankly surprised that Undeveloped is a domain investor though... Maybe that was widely known before, but I don't follow their company, so personally I was unaware until now.one was reasonreason who we all know, the other strong bidder was media options
First question why haven't they paid for it, I guess they work out of an area where bikes rule the roadways.I'm frankly surprised that Undeveloped is a domain investor though... Maybe that was widely known before, but I don't follow their company, so personally I was unaware until now.
I guess the question I'm left with is, why would they compete in auction against the same people they are selling their service to?
When companies do this it reflects a serious disregard for the support and investment into their system by the current customer base.First question why haven't they paid for it, I guess they work out of an area where bikes rule the roadways.
Every company tends to big against their customers taryn at namejet, turn commerce at godaddy, who knows what else.
whats wrong with Uniregistry ?W
I avoid these companies as much as possible. I do not use Uniregistry at all..
As I mentioned above, they bid against domainers in auctions and compete against their own customers. The money customers spend at Uniregistry is used to compete directly against those same customers in auctions (bid handle "taryn" at NameJet for example).whats wrong with Uniregistry ?
I like Uniregistry .. clear design ..great usabilty. marketplace with 10% escrow
$72K isn't exactly giving it away. I think the dropcatcher got a good price, and if the buyer is happy, it's all good, they just have to pay up.so it wasnt end user sale?![]()
Thank you for the clarificationAs I mentioned above, they bid against domainers in auctions and compete against their own customers. The money customers spend at Uniregistry is used to compete directly against those same customers in auctions (bid handle "taryn" at NameJet for example).
Don't you think it's "wrong" for a company to use the profit they get from their customers to compete against those customers?
You could say godaddy does this as well with their portfolio acquisitions and selling them on afternic.As I mentioned above, they bid against domainers in auctions and compete against their own customers. The money customers spend at Uniregistry is used to compete directly against those same customers in auctions (bid handle "taryn" at NameJet for example).
Don't you think it's "wrong" for a company to use the profit they get from their customers to compete against those customers?
We can verify this purchase. eBikes are extremely popular in Europe and Asia and this domain is the category killer in that industry. The domain is worth well beyond what it got sold for. That's the beauty of expiration auctions like this one. All bidders were investors.
It also puts them in a position where they do things like this to their customers.You could say godaddy does this as well with their portfolio acquisitions and selling them on afternic.
It also puts them in a position where they do things like this to their customers.
Fast forward to today, ebike.com is redirected to multinational Bosch of course, it all makes sense. 70k is peanuts to them.