NameSilo

information DomainMarket.com/Mike Mann’s Domains

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Arca

Top Member
Impact
5,582
domainmarket.png

Domains owned by Mike Mann, listed for sale at Domain Market:
GoogleMicrosoft.com
MicrosoftSystems.com
MicrosoftBrowser.com
MicrosoftInstaller.com
MicrosoftTech.com
GoogleOptimization.com
RankingOnGoogle.com
GetOnGoogle.com
GoogleAnalysis.com
GoogleTranslates.com
GoogleGrass.com
GoogleAnalyzer.com
GoogleAnalyticsTraining.com
RollsRoyceDealership.com
ToyotaExperience.com
ToyotaCup.com
ToyotaIndustrial.com
MercedesTrucks.com
MarlboroMarket.com
PepsiCup.com
SiemensElectric.com
SiemensElectrical.com
VerizonSupport.com
BudweiserBlog.com
VolkswagenTuning.com
MasterCardProcessing.com
iPhoneRadio.com
iPhoneReport.com
iPhoneCompany.com
iPhoneHeadsets.com
iPhoneAppsGames.com
iTunesi.com
iPodA.com
iPodDesign.com
iPodServices.com
iPodTouches.com
OculusVirtualReality.com
Photoshopa.com
YoutubeHits.com
YoutubePartnership.com
YoutubeCommunity.com
FedexWatch.com
FerrariLimousine.com
iPadUpdates.com
iPadEasy.com
iPadMovies.com
iPadWebDesign.com
SamsungZone.com
PorschePower.com
PayPalLA.com
Wikipedians.com
ProPorsche.com
OfficialDonaldTrump.com
SonyBluRay.com
FacebookServices.com
FacebookCommerce.com
FacebookAdverts.com
FacebookStrategy.com
WordpressCollege.com
WordpressManagement.com
WordPressCommunity.com
HomeRealtor.com
MarylandRealtor.com
FloridaHomeRealtor.com
EastBayRealtors.com
NikeHuarache.com
SkypeYou.com
SkypeTranslator.com
TheLinkedin.com
LinkedinProfiles.com
PlaystationE.com
eBayShipper.com
eBayApps.com
eBayRatings.com
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I was just thinking of the same. Who between Google and Microsoft files the UDRP for GoogleMicrosoft.com? This was perhaps a kind of intentional practical joke on the trademark holders.

I think Google will do the first since the name is in the front unless the name is MicrosoftGoogle.com... LOL
 
0
•••
Cant US companies sue for damages of up to 100k for cybersquatting if they prove damages, for each violation?
meant to say 1k
 
0
•••
what i learned from domaining is. ethics are only important to some. but sales trump everything.
 
6
•••
What Remedies May be Granted by the Court for Violations of the Act?

The Act authorizes a court to order the forfeiture or cancellation of a domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. In lieu of actual damages, the plaintiff may elect statutory damages and the court has discretion to award damages of not less than $1,000 and not more than $100,000 per domain name, as the court considers just. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d).

An infamous cybersquatter named John Zuccarini lost an ACPA lawsuit in October of 2000, when the court awarded the plaintiff statutory damages of $500,000 for each of five domain names that were obtained in bad faith and that were confusingly similar to the plaintiff’s trademark. The court also ordered Mr. Zuccarini to pay attorneys’ fees of more than $30,000. See Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. v. Zuccarini.
 
0
•••
It's true that exposure is important to sell domains mainly if the buyer is an investor. If the buyer is an end user, the end user knows what he wants to buy so i don't think that it's that important to list on sedo as end user will search for the right domain by different ways.
If an important domainer like Mike Mann needs sedo to sell his domains, why would he build a company ? I mean he would just create a blog and list his domains on platforms. That would mean that the most important and famous domain sellers can't do without domain platforms like sedo, godaddy, flippa and others ?

Who says he only sells to end users. Like people have said, just more exposure. If he's getting sales thru Sedo, obviously it works listing there.

Looks like 2 sales from that link that week. 2 in the top 9:

$47,000
$19,888


that seems like 2 good reasons to list there. Then who knows how many more sales not listed in the top 20.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
This is not a good sign for new domainers probably. Domainers like him are like heroes for all in the industry, but if this comes from one of the top domainer than its definitely not going good.
Just checked namebio with google keyword and produced following;
I don not know who the buyers and sellers are, but see the platforms (also no idea, if these platforms are liable to not sell these famous TM domains), all are well known and on top of the industry. I would say, there are many (top players) are doing cybersquating to some extent. Bad examples for any one in this industry.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back