LeaseThis - 12 mths
I give LeaseThis,com 12 mths before it is either merged or "restructured" with TrafficZ, or withers away.
LeaseThis' business model is not scalable and ultimately flawed.
1. Jury is still out on whether sectors other than real estate are susceptible to leasing.
LeaseThis have correctly identified the real estate sector as being somewhat susceptible for end users (small independent realtors) to lease ('premium') domains to market their wares but the jury's still out on whether other sectors will go for leasing in a big way.
Regardless, most end users want domains to own - not lease.
Limited appeal imo (but see (4))
2. The idea of spending huge sums eg. sponsoring the 2006 National Association of Realtors (NAR) (likely $5X,XXX+) - for meagre returns of $XX/mth per domain is akin to handing out $100 bills to passerbys. Loss making and doomed to failure.
Do the ROI math for required no. of domains to be leased to breakeven - let alone make a profit.
LeaseThis have to
continue on spending boatloads to even get users to the website. And this for returns of $XX/mth per domain.
It is not like having a PPC page with "For sale" link that can take an interested visitor landing on it to "check what's there" to the sales site (sedo) = zero marginal cost marketing.
LeaseThis does not have this luxury (their 'partner' Trafficz is a small player in parking and to this day still haven't managed to have a 'For Lease' link for domains listed with LeaseThis that are also parked with Trafficz)
And guess what...sponsoring the NAR is going to do diddly squat for categories other than real estate
3. And before I hear someone shout out about their "sales team"?
Think about it. The devil is in the details...
Do you expect this "team" to cold call prospects (good luck with it, there are not enough hrs per day to devote to even a tiny % of the best domains in database. I hope staff are paid on results!) looking for the fabled end-user enticing the decision maker (good luck finding who it is and getting around gatekeepers) once they have him on the phone...all that effort and for selling him on the idea of $XX/mth domains!
This ain't selling them on $100,000 software or hardware...
Keep on promoting NAR at great cost?
Or maybe an ad in Wall Street journal costing $100,000 is in order eh?
Or maybe a bulk spam campaign...?
(If they could find the fabled end user for a given domain they would do better selling them domains instead of leasing.
It would be the 'holy grail' for domainers)
4. Of course, leasing
traffic domains is a benefit and would appeal to any end user (particularly small) for potential leads - but shucks, said end user has no way of knowing (if by chance they land on the site) since there are no stats available anywhere and as most domains are parked elsewhere.
And remember, for this domain lead generation there is also competion with other forms of buying leads eg. PPC, print ads etc.
It's all cost vs benefit from end user POV.
Don't hold your breath, folks...'course you have nothing to lose...
