Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

Discuss BrandBucket Rejects

NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

starizec

Domaining as hobbyEstablished Member
Impact
377
My rejected names
R e c y c l i f y
S q u a d T a s k
F e a t f u l
E x c e s i o r

Any thoughts?
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
0
•••
Last Rejects

- CHATOPOLY (I thought was a Nobrainer)
- SLYPPY
- LORQA (PYCASSO got accepted even well priced so i took another "latin shot")
- GENETIKO
- PUQQO

accepted

VAPOSO
VIPITA
QABLA
 
0
•••
Last Rejects

- CHATOPOLY (I thought was a Nobrainer)
- SLYPPY
- LORQA (PYCASSO got accepted even well priced so i took another "latin shot")
- GENETIKO
- PUQQO

accepted

VAPOSO
VIPITA
QABLA

I would have bet on that BB would accept L/o/r/q/a and P/u/q/q/o.
 
2
•••
Recently rejected:

tele/crown
steel/heat
tuffy/dog
sector/base
invest/dot
cigar/snob
drug/lot

Accepted:

p/a/t/e/l/i
v/a/t/y/x
 
0
•••
Think about end user taste not BB taste..
 
1
•••
No, actually think BB taste. End users like many names that BB doesn't. Other marketplaces like them too.

Just to give an idea, since I started with BB before I did with BR, I submitted 200 names rejected by BB and got about 70 of them approved for BR.

Generally my choice for buying brandables seems to be more in line with BR, we probably have similar vision, while it is very off with BB, as I get about 10%-15% approval ratio with them. I can tell what names will be approved by BB pretty accurately, but just cannot bring myself to like those kind of names to invest in them.
 
5
•••
1
•••
K/E/N/I/X/O rejected
 
1
•••
1
•••
0
•••
0
•••
2
•••
My stats(new submission)

Submitted: 14
Accepted: 11

Rejected

Data/o/matic
Nutri/kind
Targetek
 
1
•••
Are you in anyway proposing that Michael should stop selling names on BB because he is the MD?
 
0
•••
I have a 38% acceptance rate (which is nice I guess), but the last batch of submission was a disaster: 11 submissions, 1 accepted name. Some of the rejected ones were actually nice (like Chart/Bunny, Zoomerr, Startup/Decor).
 
0
•••
I have no experience with brand bucket always been generic but would any of these be acceptable?
aactor dot com
arleyne dot com
dasf dot net
faxcar dot com
inhered dot com
kruges dot com
l-c-l dot com
leakky dot com
marketrz dot com
mcfact dot com
muckup dot com
sukido dot com
webmastrz dot com

my thoughts are probably none maybe kruges
 
0
•••
0
•••
aactor dot com
arleyne dot com
dasf dot net
faxcar dot com
inhered dot com
kruges dot com
l-c-l dot com
leakky dot com
marketrz dot com
mcfact dot com
muckup dot com
sukido dot com
webmastrz dot com

sukido and muckup have more chances than others imho
 
2
•••
Why z/m/a/r/t/l/y is accepted but z/o/l/d/o/u/t rejected?

z/o/l/d/o/u/t: 508 regged .coms contain 'Sold Out' I don't think BB has many two word domains that begin w/ z

Why is 6-letter Z/m/a/r/t/l/y suggested a higher price than 5 letter Z/m/a/r/t/y?

Z/m/a/r/t/l/y (published this year): 442 regged .coms containing 'Smartly' $2,675 Stronger keyword?

Z/m/a/r/t/y (published last year): 2,098 regged .coms containing 'Smarty' $2,395 Better radio test?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
z/o/l/d/o/u/t: 508 regged .coms contain 'Sold Out' I don't think BB has many two word domains that begin w/ z

Why is 6-letter Z/m/a/r/t/l/y suggested a higher price than 5 letter Z/m/a/r/t/y?

Z/m/a/r/t/l/y (published this year): 442 regged .coms containing 'Smartly' $2,675 Stronger keyword?

Z/m/a/r/t/y (published last year): 2,098 regged .coms containing 'Smarty' $2,395 Better radio test?

Except, sold-out is not a two word name.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/soldโ€“out

"A sold-out event"


Full Definition of soldโ€“out


  1. : having all available tickets or accommodations sold completely and especially in advance;also : of or relating to a sold-out event <a soldโ€“out crowd>
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Appraise.net
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back