- Impact
- 377
My rejected names
R e c y c l i f y
S q u a d T a s k
F e a t f u l
E x c e s i o r
Any thoughts?
R e c y c l i f y
S q u a d T a s k
F e a t f u l
E x c e s i o r
Any thoughts?


No reason to check everything so let's just check the similar combinations of TIFNA. All of these below are available so your theory doesn't hold water. If I had to pick a available percentage of the 676 possible combos I would say that it's a very high percentage that are available based on this one run of IFNA domains. You continue to talk about western premiums but everyone here is only talking pure brandables.Now take every 5L that ends in NA and limit to western prem CVC and you have only 676 possible combos. Something tells me 90%-100% of those are taken. Care to check?
No reason to check everything so let's just check the similar combinations of TIFNA. All of these below are available so your theory doesn't hold water. If I had to pick a available percentage of the 676 possible combos I would say that it's a very high percentage that are available based on this one run of IFNA domains. You continue to talk about western premiums but everyone here is only talking pure brandables.
Hifna
Kifna
Pifna
Qifna
Vifna
Wifna
Yifna
Zifna
Like I said you keep talking about WP but we are talking about brandables. Who cares about WPs.I recommend to everyone to study Logic. It is very helpful in day to day life, work. Everywhere. WP and Brandables are not mutually exclusive. I am talking Brandables consisting of WP, as Tifna would be in that category.
Judging by your examples, you don't know what Western Premiums term means. From your examples, only Hifna and Pifna would be in that category. 11/13 taken = 85%. I'd say that is pretty close to 90%-100% range I mentioned. And also it is small sample size from 676 I was referring to.
Keith, if someone comments on something it is not necessarily about themselves.
I have stopped submitting names to BB because I don't accept their favoritism showing itself in many things.
Your approach to their rejects is pretty much like "if they rejected it must be not good enough and let me look for the reason". With that approach any name can be found bad, from Microsoft (micro and soft, who wants to be small and soft?), Google (is that go ogle, goo has bad meaning), Apple (too generic) etc.
Techzotic might have 3 consonants, but at least those 3 make just two sounds K and Z, not that hard to pronounce. ND + TR from the example above, on the other hand, is 4 consonants in a row. And it was not a problem for BB to accept.
If they stopped pretending there is a science behind their choices, I would not mind at all. But pretending that they are linguistic experts and branding experts and somehow they do some deep analysis on submitted names is pure BS that I cannot stand.
They might not be looking for Western Prem, but they might be looking for a meaning/association, acronym etc. and for those Western Prems work the best for most.
That is why Western Prem random LLLL trades double/triple of the price of random LLLL with other letters in it and pronounceable LLLL with all prems might command even higher premium.
Take TIFNA. NA in the end can mean North America and for company to bring meaning to the brand, they'd need just to work with TIF. How about, Trade, Investments, Funds, North America?
And even when they are not looking for meaning, the pronunciation with those letters is closest to natural.
one of the biggest brands in the world is recognised as 3 consonants- bmw {we might have heard of it?}
gkn ? 3 consonants two huge brands? manchester united and manchester city?
{cant be successful brands because the city {part of both teams names {brand} has 3 consonants in a row?
Like I said you keep talking about WP but we are talking about brandables. Who cares about WPs.
The bottom line is F as the third letter in any 5L combination is crap unless it's part of an ending of a word like Gift or beginning like Flow. If there isn't a partial word used in the name it's junk. Period. Unless it's a name like Jiffy then F is gold but F in the third position of any BRANDABLE 5L that has nothing to do with an actual word is junk. All of this junk below is available if you want it. It's all pronounceable and some would say brandable but I say junk. I can come up with thousands like this. Third letter as an F in 5Ls is straight up garbage when it comes to pure brandables!!
Bifno
Difno
Fifno
Hifno
Kifno
Lifno
Mifno
Pifno
Qfno
Rifno
Vifno
Wifno
Yifno
Zifno
Bifnu
Difnu
Fifnu
Gifnu
Hifnu
Jifnu
Kifnu
Lifnu
Mifnu
Nifnu
Pifnu
Rifnu
Sifnu
Tifnu
Vifnu
Wifnu
Yifnu
Hifma
Jifma
Kifma
Qifma
Tifma
Vifma
Wifma
Yifma
Zifma
Like I said you keep talking about WP but we are talking about brandables. Who cares about WPs.
The bottom line is F as the third letter in any 5L combination is crap unless it's part of an ending of a word like Gift or beginning like Flow. If there isn't a partial word used in the name it's junk. Period. Unless it's a name like Jiffy then F is gold but F in the third position of any BRANDABLE 5L that has nothing to do with an actual word is junk. All of this junk below is available if you want it. It's all pronounceable and some would say brandable but I say junk. I can come up with thousands like this. Third letter as an F in 5Ls is straight up garbage when it comes to pure brandables!!
Bifno
Difno
Fifno
Hifno
Kifno
Lifno
Mifno
Pifno
Qfno
Rifno
Vifno
Wifno
Yifno
Zifno
Bifnu
Difnu
Fifnu
Gifnu
Hifnu
Jifnu
Kifnu
Lifnu
Mifnu
Nifnu
Pifnu
Rifnu
Sifnu
Tifnu
Vifnu
Wifnu
Yifnu
Hifma
Jifma
Kifma
Qifma
Tifma
Vifma
Wifma
Yifma
Zifma
Can we stay in the same category, when discussing a subject?! We are discussing currently brandable pronounceables. LLL acronym brands is completely different beast. And yes, there are thousands of examples of them. As well as LLLL all consonant acronyms.
I'm not going to sit here and give a western premium lesson when this is a brandable thread. For the fifth time we are not talking about western premiums. We are talking about brandables but then again you think NYCLY is a brandable when I and most here think it's far from it.Why are you discussing Western Premiums if you don't know what Western Premiums mean?
To say there are millions of other 5Ls is misleading. Yes, there are millions of 5Ls, but most of them don't fit the most desirable combos for branding.
Take tifna. If someone wants Western prem CVCCV pattern, there are only 35152 of those available.
And if you want all Western prem CVCCV or CVCVC or VCVCV pattern, there are only 81120 of those for the whole planet. That is it. And most of them, I am pretty sure, are already under use. Let's say half is available for sale, that still makes just around 40,000 names. Yes, they are even rarer commodity than a random LLLL.com and certainly easier to pronounce/communicate/remember than some LLLLs.
just bought bioue.com and dioup.com
which is more brandable from my following domains and why?
tifna.com fiyna.com bioue.com & dioup.com
Not good choices, imo.
Even windowclean is not that good, mistype of that is waste of money.
dioup and bioue, as well as fiyna are not good buys either.


