

commandercody said:They have been trying to do this for a long time, at least banning them in the U.S. It's a bad thing for domainers who invested in prized casino keywords, yet the online industry is not fully governed by the government. Therefore they can really screw their patrons and the government misses out on their cut from the large legitimate ones. It's really nothing more than a save their money disguised as helping the consumers from fraudulent casino site owners.
dgridley said:There are a couple concerns I have with this.. 1) Congress trying to sneak legislation under the radar by tacking it on to an unrelated bill, and 2) how will this affect gaaming sites like Pogo.com or other sites that allow you to play for potential cash prizes? Or traffic rotation sites that allow you to play lotto type games while viewing sites for a chance to win something?
-X- said:I agree...this opening up a can of worms that can spread into sites like pogo and others that i enjoy playing on....I surely hope it doesn't.....It is good clean fun
qwhois said:It wouldn't affect the likes of pogo as people are not paying to participate, or are they? I never remember paying to play Golf on Pogo! This would surely mean an end to betting online also, I guess? So no more namebucks betting![]()
Lotteries should be exempt though I have heard, the balls unblock the tubes...![]()
