CriticalThinking.com: Casestudy of a Dropped Name Auction

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

dkh

Established Member
Impact
2
OK, I thought I understood the drop cycle and Snapnames/NameJet auction protocols, but it appears I have something more to learn. Here's the crack.

NameJet's pre-release lists said CriticalThinking.com was slated to drop and that it had to be backordered by March 8. I did this at NameJet and Snapnames. Snapnames caught it, and the auction began straightaway on March 8th. I received an email telling me that someone had already outbid my "lowend" backorder bid, and I made a note to check in on the 11th when the auction ended.

Well, I did so yesterday, but I was an hour too late (due to factors beyond my control). Anyway, I saw that the auction had ended, that its status was "Pending Payment," and that namehound had "won" the auction for $284.

Now, this is a domain that received an estimated 757 searches per day (according to certain metrics), had 125 backlinks, an Alexa rating in the mid-1 millions, and a reg date back in '96. Something of real interest. And namehound "won" the auction for $284?

I started kicking myself in the a** real hard for missing the ending time.

But then I smelled a rat. $284? I thought, "There is no way that the rest of the people who backordered that name would let it go for that low." So, I checked the URL on the frontside, and low and behold, the site was up and running as if nothing had happened (when it had not been up and running the day before, I don't think). I stopped kicking myself and instead focused on how pissed off namehound probably was (the nonwinning winner).

So here's my question: How in the heck did this name ever go into auction in the first place? I thought the dropcatchers could not start auctions until a domain had "truly" dropped (as in "dropped dropped").

If that's how it's supposed to work, then how did Snapnames make this error? I can only assume that this is a case of the original registrant re-registering the name very late in the pending delete period and that the databases at the registrar and Snapnames did not communicate that fact to each other in time. But I'm seeking validation from the crowd.

Thoughts? Anything similar happen to anyone else out there??
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
0
•••
Happens quite often, and the person who thinks they won the name (Well, they did win it - just the backordering company doesn't have the "prize" that they won.) inevitably ends up here asking what they can do about it. Jump into the legal issues forum and look for snapnames and pool and you'll get a virtual "earful" ;)

-Allan :gl:
 
0
•••
It is important to understand the DNS system. Since this domain is registered threw NetSol, it would of went threw NameJet.com not SnapNames.com . So that right there, should of put up a red flag.

Also, it never hurts to actually go to the domain and see what's on the page. This will tell you as well.

I have seen snapnames do this several times on domains that should not be going to auction. Most of the times, there is still a Ghost Record at one of there registrars, so it see's that. That wasn't the case with this one, since the domain has been with NetSol all along.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back