.tv Business models and Partnerships for .tv's

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

[email protected]

Established Member
Impact
1
Hello My name is Dave Lalande and I own a small startup called Impel.TV

This is my first thread in many many years. I would like to attempt to start some talk about business models and partnerships with .tv domain names. What else can we do with .tv domain names besides sell them to each other or sell them to an occasional end user? How about parking... That's not really doing anything with the great name. We ALL need people making markets with .tv's, making the domain extension popular. Watch what happens to the value of you .tv's when someone sells one or more to the Google machine for a billion dollars.

I believe that .tv actually means something to people. I think we all do. It's really the only one other than .com that really makes people think of something.

Years ago, via a Public company, I filed patent on a domain name system addition called, Simplified Domains. The concept is that SD would allow for any domain name extension, 3-back. That is micros.oft or ap.ple or taxi.cab. You would just type in the word(s) and hit enter, the browser would test for the domain "3-back" and if it didn't resolve it would kick it over to the current domain name system to check for the silly "categorized" ones we now use. It worked great and we had $50K in domain registrations in the first 2 days. I didn't allow this company to actually charge anyone, but it was an interesting test of the concept. I was actually asked to speak at an ICANN meeting in LA about Simplified Domains and did just that. You can read more about SD of course, now that I have told you this much.

I told about Simplified Domains to show a little history I have had with domain names and also to impress the fact that the naming categorization model, that is .biz, .info and the rest, are garbage. They don't REALLY mean anything. It's goofy to roll out more, quite frankly. If they roll out .sex, churches will buy them up to protect themselves and that just runs the cost of doing business up for everyone.

Having said that, IF a domain extension did actually mean something (.tv) theeeeeeeeen we would have something of value. :) That's us folks. .tv does actually mean something. Congrats to all the .tv'ers, you are in the right place a good time, a little early, but great timing never-the-less. That is, if you can find an "end user" to buy your name OR, you figure out a "legitimate" revenue stream with it. Parking is not legit, we all have figured that out. Only a handful of people make any real money this way, it's in the numbers and paying $40+ for the domain names makes it tougher.

The television industry is in turmoil. I recently read that 30% of the ad revenue had been ripped out and handed over to the Internet. Disruption... Other industries are seeing this Internet disruption, we are all reading about it. The travel industry, real estate, gambling, music, government, software/OS, nothing is immune to what the Internet is doing. It's clearing the playing field and saying "start over".

It's the television industry's turn and .tv is where it's going to happen. Did you ever wonder how someone comes to own an NBC affiliate? Well, this is it, your chance. If someone could have slapped down a chance to own a television channel waaaaaaaay back when the Television Industry 1.0 was taking place and then said, "THIS IS YOUR CHANCE", would you have jumped? Seriously, sell your domain name for 3-4 times the cost, park it for pennies or use it. Try something... What? We don't know, if we did, it would be too late or too much money to get into for most of us. That's the cool thing about the only other potentially commercial domain name extension besides .com that means anything. .TV :) It makes me smile when I write .tv.

So here is the deal, let's talk about business models that we know of, the good, bad and the ugly. Although, ugly is okay if the content is good, on the Internet. How do we make money with these names? Impel.TV believes that the Internet will break the television viewers/business into little chucks, islands of interest. CBS has a broad range of programming for instance, whereas you would assume that tampabay.tv is going to be about Tampa, FL., before you land there. Well this is an advertisers dream. Target marketing. Everything about a topic of interest in one place. Now marketeers are hunting with a rifle.tv not a shotgun.tv. If what you want to sell is in Tampa, you can pretty much count on the audience's interest in tampabay.tv, tampa.tv or tampaguide.tv. (I was doing so well :))

Before I go on any further and explain about what Impel.TV does and some partnership ideas, I want to ask if there is a genuine interest from this crowd about doing something with your names, not just sitting on them? If you want to keep you "for sale" options open, well that's just part of the model that needs to be there for you to participate? Take it from a guy that has bought and sold a number companies/businesses, including to a public entity, your domain name is worth more if there is revenue attached. WAAAAAAAAAAAAY more. Try marketing your name with $5K monthly revenue attached and a market started. :) Your negotiating position now becomes mathematical. Not, "because I think it's a great name". You now can say, "I am going to lose $60K a year selling you this name, what's that worth?"

Are you interested in figuring this out? I am starting to meet a few that are, right here on namepros.com That is what this thread is about, let's talk business models and partnerships.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
lenah said:
Dave have you ever considered just buying the domains? or does your model requires our active participation?


I think it is a way to leverage the value of other peoples domains without having to buy them, and it gives the domain owner a new way monetize while waiting on making a sale of the domain.

A great idea, but very close to what Demand Media is doing...
 
0
•••
All this looks and sounds a little too complicated for me......unfortunately I see nothing of any interest whatsoever in any of the names you have given as working examples of .tv sites....

When I get involved with development of a ..tv I try and do it justice by making it more than a glorified .com, hence allthings.tv, but I can name many other examples of really nice geo sites, such as Boston TV, which I recently gave a 5 out of 10 ratings to but still beats yours hands down.... Dave, with the greatest of respect, your sites look like glorified .com parking pages.......why would I want anything to do with such a network. I would rather invest my own dollars in my own company - get a decent web designer, pay what it takes to get a decent job done - and go from there......

Getting stuck in the mud with an IMPEL.TV site really makes me shake my head in disbelief.....
 
0
•••
Maybe you can explain to the power of me.tv that you want us to add to Impel.TV? We will do this. Inviting Mom is not a show stopper. Our wiki functionality, we turned off. It was toooooo busy. We had more menus that we could use at the moment. I will turn on forums on dotell.TV soon so you know we aren't bluffing. I own a bunch of wiki names by the way, I am all about social networking, although, I don't know how much of that is really going to go on, once this stuff moves to the TV in your living room and you lose the keyboard?

You are pretty close. We don't just have hooks to YouTube, but yes you search via Tags, Related Search, Username, etc. We also support a few other API's and are now spending much of our efforts beefing these up, so that our channels will offer as much video as possible.

I am not going to name drop, because its unprofessional. But we are talking with some of the largest media companies on the planet. We don't have any particular arrangements with YouTube. YouTube would make an agreement with anyone they thought would be of benefit to them.

We do however have discussions going with AOL/Brightcove. I can tell you this because Brightcove is our video host for the videos that get uploaded to our channels.

Not sure what efficient ad deliver you are speaking of, it sounds like a marketing pitch. YouTube is going to pay whomever to show their videos to viewers, just like the rest. We are not interested in a tie to any one company that would prohibit a partnership with another.

It's all about traffic and eyes on the ads. We have tools for efficiently bringing in vids from YouTube, AOL and Veoh. We are working on finishing Revver, Grouper and Brightcove's API's. We are also working on completely making much of this automatic, no humans.

We moderate everything so we are able to cut out the illegal. Our interface allows for a "producer" to bring up a group of 100 results on a page and then work within those videos, watching, reading the detail on the vid and what not, to make sure they approve. At the end of the day, we aren't interested in the most video, but the legal video that most people would be interested in watching.

Thanks for the questions.

Dave Lalande
Impel.TV


MINDWRECKER.TV said:
Correct me if im wrong but lets try to get this described in less than one paragraph.

IMPEL is providing a packaged site with banners, which can be designed and modified any way the owner sees fit layout wise,and this site/script also has a code, which automatically generates videos from sites such as Youtube, etc.

Im assuming these videos are generated automatcially based on doing a search for TAGS associated with the videos on YouTube etc???

You also have some sort of ad revenue sharing, and you are in a network with other .TV sites.

The thing is, and I would have to agree with equity78,
The me tools seem way more powerful in the long run, because I know that Demand is going to have better and bigger relationships with the ability to leverage ad revenue with content and get it distributed through there systems at a more efficient rate.

Plus much of this content will be legal to distribute.....

Do you have agreements with YouTube
 
0
•••
Well I dont think Its for me, I was expecting something else... good luck though.
 
0
•••
Yes Sir, this is correct... The fact that someone else is doing this is fine, there is room for more than one of us. We don't want to have to buy all the names, we don't have the money nor would we have the staff to populate them all. We need partners to help us grow our network.

MINDWRECKER.TV said:
I think it is a way to leverage the value of other peoples domains without having to buy them, and it gives the domain owner a new way monetize while waiting on making a sale of the domain.

A great idea, but very close to what Demand Media is doing...

I think investor your own dollars is a great idea. I look forward to seeing the results. It could be that you come back to Impel.TV in a year and we just give it up and join you. I have no problem with that if I thought it would earn me alot more of a return than I am currently getting with the .tv's we own. We just want to figure out a way to maximize the return, that's all.

ALLTHINGS.TV said:
All this looks and sounds a little too complicated for me......unfortunately I see nothing of any interest whatsoever in any of the names you have given as working examples of .tv sites....

When I get involved with development of a ..tv I try and do it justice by making it more than a glorified .com, hence allthings.tv, but I can name many other examples of really nice geo sites, such as Boston TV, which I recently gave a 5 out of 10 ratings to but still beats yours hands down.... Dave, with the greatest of respect, your sites look like glorified .com parking pages.......why would I want anything to do with such a network. I would rather invest my own dollars in my own company - get a decent web designer, pay what it takes to get a decent job done - and go from there......

Getting stuck in the mud with an IMPEL.TV site really makes me shake my head in disbelief.....
 
0
•••
Dave,

As the owner of a number of high quality geo sites, I have been bombarded with business proposals left right and center. The fact that you are the last person on the block to throw an offer onto the table is not your fault - its your timing thats off......

But the fact that your offer is by far, and I repeat, by far , the least attractive option I have seen/heard to date should make you reconsider your business model...

Are you brave enough to start from scratch??
 
0
•••
Perfect, come back BDM. We want to know what you were expecting. Please, that is what this discussion was supposed to be about. New ideas, trying something besides just parking these names. Please tell us your ideas. What would excite you about a model?

In business we like to hear, this is the problem and here is a potential solution. I don't see anyone throwing out ideas, just describing how good other services are, that they aren't a part of???

Does anyone have any ideas on what would work, how to change what's already out there? I was hoping that we would get some real ideas here. Sounds like nobody really has a clue what will work or how to make the current ideas actually online any better?

BDM1 said:
Well I dont think Its for me, I was expecting something else... good luck though.
 
0
•••
Does anyone have any ideas on what would work, how to change what's already out there?

I DO
 
0
•••
Sounds like nobody really has a clue what will work or how to make the current ideas actually online any better?

If someone did they sure would not share that information freely, they would be doing it themselves.
 
0
•••
Correct.
 
0
•••
no more discussion for me. :)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
localexperts said:
Does anyone have any ideas on what would work, how to change what's already out there?

I DO


Hows it going Local?!!

Three things...Firstly, I thought you were not going to post any more!!!!
Secondly, I DO was registered by myself and a friend a few days ago
and third, notice how this guy Dave Impel is ignoring my to the point , no BS, critique of his business model.....


asking people to come back for their input, yet ignore the one staring him in the face is rather startling......!!!
 
0
•••
Develop what? Sounds like we are done, there is not any ideas here. Nobody has come up with anything. I was hoping to hear something of a good idea out of this crowd, but I guess that isn't going to happen, at least with the overnight crowd. You of course don't have to partner with us, but that is not what the intent this thread, it was to drum up some good ideas, something innovative. You guys have already told me we aren't, that would imply that you have an idea of what is? You know something the rest of us don't? Please, share... Did you join this thread just to beat on me, or do you have something smart to say.

Throw out an idea, just one. Something unique. Else we have failed to jump start anything here. I refuse to believe that with as smart as you guys are, you can't throw out something redeeming.

BDM1 said:
I agree allthings... Might be good for a kid wanting to park his pages because he doesnt have the money to develop, but as developing isnt that expensive now, I cant see any reason someome would do what David has put forward.
Im not saying the concept is not a good idea, I just dont think it is a good idea for someone really serious in getting into the .TV business.

I also think the niche market is the right track, but looking at impels list of names, I cant see many that are good at all.

I cannot see why beer.tv or stockmarket.tv would want to go this route. All they would be doing is getting exposure for you and short changing themselves really.

Anyway, if nothing else, this thread has finally bought out discussion in developing, so to me thats a great thing..

No offence Dave, but some of us are a lot further down the track than this, but Im sure you could be succssful down the line. Thank you for the ideas and your concept and I really do hope you succeed in your vision. ;)
 
0
•••
In the spirit of the thread, I will foster conversation.

Our business model is based on pay per lead. Respond (dot) com runs that model. IAC. Reply.com Leads.com.

Pay Per Lead is a very tough ( I had 30 companies try to compete against us and they all went out of business - I now own one of my old competitors after Paul Allen and Russ Horowitz dumped $60M in them - they ran ads on TV - and went out of business). Oh and Respond. Well they bought my company, we kicked out the executive team, fired all the Respond employees and took over the name. So Respond didn't even make it, netgenshopper (dot) com did.

Pay Per Lead will work with .TV. People see a video, they want to get more information, submit a lead. Boom $10-$80 for a single lead.

Business Model Discussion and I'm waiting for a server upgrade!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
localexperts said:
Does anyone have any ideas on what would work, how to change what's already out there?

I DO


Good for you George -- the difference is Dave is trying to grow his own business and involve/help other .tv'ers at the same time while you've annouced you're away working on your own thing that has not been offered to or involve a majority of the .tv portfolio owners here at NamePros (which is not a bad thing, but the difference nevertheless). It is my understanding that this thead was created for all .tv'ers to benefit and grow as a community, while building value for our domains. Impel.tv is your competition.

Thanks Dave for your time and putting that offer out there and explaining things and being open to new ideas. Its going to appeal to some and not to others. As time progresses, ideas, concepts and strategies will only get better no matter what anyone says (or doesn't say).

Let's keep the ideas and positive "how to work together" attitude and all make money together.

CCD

localexperts said:
Pay Per Lead will work with .TV. People see a video, they want to get more information, submit a lead. Boom $10-$80 for a single lead.

Now that's what I'm talking about! NICE!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
No, I am brave enough to listen to your original ideas. Stop making everyone else think. Trying sharing that great mind of yours. I can't imagine that you do any business at all with your attitude. You sound a little bummed that someone hasn't handed you a bag of money yet?

Start me from scratch. That is exactly what I am doing here. Trying to figure out, what is the best path? Do you know something we don't? Please share. Soften your heart and help.

I was going to show your site to some people, but I don't know why I would do that, knowing what kind of guy is behind it. You must be a kid. Good luck with your high quality names I hope you sell high. Really...

I think you site is really nice looking by the way.

Good Luck...

ALLTHINGS.TV said:
Dave,

As the owner of a number of high quality geo sites, I have been bombarded with business proposals left right and center. The fact that you are the last person on the block to throw an offer onto the table is not your fault - its your timing thats off......

But the fact that your offer is by far, and I repeat, by far , the least attractive option I have seen/heard to date should make you reconsider your business model...

Are you brave enough to start from scratch??
 
0
•••
localexperts said:
Does anyone have any ideas on what would work, how to change what's already out there?

I DO

Me too :)
 
0
•••
Actually Roy, I have included several people from this board. We had a meeting in Northern Virginia on Monday. I was just selective in which domains we decided to assist.
 
0
•••
no more discussion for me. :)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
neobodhi said:
If someone did they sure would not share that information freely, they would be doing it themselves.

True! For the time being anyway. Too much at stake.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back