Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99

BANS or Money-Tree?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
:hi:-,

I know this srictly isn't the right place to introduce myself but as it's my first post I thought I should at least say hello.

I also want to say thanks to everyone that posts on these forums; I've been domaining for a couple of weeks now and have learnt so much just by sitting in the background and reading what you all post.

Anyway, to my question which I hope someone will kindly answer...

I've bought about 7 domains, nothing too fancy, just to get me going. All are currently parked (6 with Sedo, 1 with domainparking) but have quickly realised that this isn't the way to earn passive revenue from them.

What does look like a very good solution - to me at least - are the ebay niche store systems BANS and Money-Tree. Can anyone tell me which is better and / or suggest something better still.

All help and advice gratefully received.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
.US domains.US domains
not knowing the domains I say develop them for content/membership. good luck with them.
 
0
•••
Bans is a great form of profit.
 
0
•••
BANS isn't too well for organic search and the pages don't index very well. Google has been on a warpath for these sites lately. I use another option called phpbay Pro for auction sites related to Ebay.

Take a look at the blogs in my sig for what it looks like.
 
0
•••
Thanks everyone, will investigate further.

Greatly appreciate the help.
 
0
•••
Hi GoldenAppleCorps Welcome to Namepros. I've been hearing about BANS and I'm still doing some research about it. I heard a lot of positive feedback about BANS and I'm thinking about trying it out. Parking doesn't give much for profit. Anyways Good luck with your decisions.
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99Dynadot โ€” .com Registration $8.99
Unstoppable Domains
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back