- Impact
- 2,017
A common argument against .mobi is that, "It's not necessary because scripts at .com sites can just redirect mobile users to the mobile version of the site." But I got to wondering...where is that actually being done right now?
I randomly checked various restaurants, stores, top websites, etc, with a mobile emulator to see where redirection is actually occurring.
Failures: (meaning: either the page didn't load at all, or it was unacceptable for mobile viewing on a standard phone)
McDonalds
Wendy's
Burger King
Popeyes (my personal favorite restaurant )
KFC
Taco Bell
Pizza Hut
Papa John's
Chuckie Cheese
Walmart
Home Depot
Walgreens
JC Penney
Boscov's
Macy's
Sears
Sony
Gamestop
Goodwill
Yahoo
CNN
Microsoft
Gateway
Creative Labs
eBay
Adobe
WikiPedia
MySpace
Xanga
Bebo
Blogger
MegaUpload
Hi5
Friendster
Digg
MLB
NHL
PGA
Nascar
Successes! (looked fine on a standard phone)
AOL
MSNBC
Fox Sports
NBA
NFL
Facebook
Amazon
Flickr
....
Pretty pathetic ratio, eh? Is it really a good idea to leave it up to mobile users to guess about whether or not a .com site will display properly (especially if they pay per their amount of usage)? Look at that list of sites that do not display properly on a cell phone...many of those are top sites! What's wrong here?! Wouldn't it be better for everyone if developers adopted .mobi as a way to set apart the mobile editions of websites? When can we stop this ridiculous guessing game?
P.S. - This "study" was done fairly and I truly picked sites/stores at random. If I checked a site, it is listed above in the appropriate catagory.
I randomly checked various restaurants, stores, top websites, etc, with a mobile emulator to see where redirection is actually occurring.
Failures: (meaning: either the page didn't load at all, or it was unacceptable for mobile viewing on a standard phone)
McDonalds
Wendy's
Burger King
Popeyes (my personal favorite restaurant )
KFC
Taco Bell
Pizza Hut
Papa John's
Chuckie Cheese
Walmart
Home Depot
Walgreens
JC Penney
Boscov's
Macy's
Sears
Sony
Gamestop
Goodwill
Yahoo
CNN
Microsoft
Gateway
Creative Labs
eBay
Adobe
WikiPedia
MySpace
Xanga
Bebo
Blogger
MegaUpload
Hi5
Friendster
Digg
MLB
NHL
PGA
Nascar
Successes! (looked fine on a standard phone)
AOL
MSNBC
Fox Sports
NBA
NFL
Amazon
Flickr
....
Pretty pathetic ratio, eh? Is it really a good idea to leave it up to mobile users to guess about whether or not a .com site will display properly (especially if they pay per their amount of usage)? Look at that list of sites that do not display properly on a cell phone...many of those are top sites! What's wrong here?! Wouldn't it be better for everyone if developers adopted .mobi as a way to set apart the mobile editions of websites? When can we stop this ridiculous guessing game?
P.S. - This "study" was done fairly and I truly picked sites/stores at random. If I checked a site, it is listed above in the appropriate catagory.
Last edited: