.com 63 character domain name sold for $800..

[Arpit131]

The domain name containing 63 9's .COM sold for $800 on GoDaddy.

Here's a screenshot:

I am still wondering who are such buyers and why do they buy such names?

 

[Rosie Lukaszczyk]

This is a valid place name (it's the upper part of the village of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch in Anglesey; uchaf means "upper" in Welsh). I used to live near there. It's the maximum number of characters for the name (63) and has the maximum number of characters in the suffix (.org.uk). Total length 70 characters.I don't think there can be any more contenders in the "valid" arena - all the others are made up or are german compound nouns.

 

[Haris]

63 domains.. they're just another level

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

This is a valid place name (it's the upper part of the village of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch in Anglesey; uchaf means "upper" in Welsh). I used to live near there. It's the maximum number of characters for the name (63) and has the maximum number of characters in the suffix (.org.uk). Total length 70 characters.I don't think there can be any more contenders in the "valid" arena - all the others are made up or are german compound nouns.

It's a 63 character domain - yes - but it is not so useable like those 63.DOMAINS are because it is 'already' the name of a (upper part of) a village while 63.DOMAINS are, apart from those which have a specific TLD, simply neutral and open for many opportunities.

Example for a neutral one:
winwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwin.win

Eample for a specific one:
sciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencescience.science

 

[dordomai]

This is a valid place name (it's the upper part of the village of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch in Anglesey; uchaf means "upper" in Welsh). I used to live near there. It's the maximum number of characters for the name (63) and has the maximum number of characters in the suffix (.org.uk). Total length 70 characters.I don't think there can be any more contenders in the "valid" arena - all the others are made up or are german compound nouns.

This is a winner. (58 chars though)

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

It's a 63 character domain - yes - but it is not so useable like those 63.DOMAINS are because it is 'already' the name of a (upper part of) a village while 63.DOMAINS are, apart from those which have a specific TLD, simply neutral and open for many opportunities.

Example for a neutral one:
winwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwin.win

Eample for a specific one:
sciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencesciencescience.science

And this is the winner.
21 times win = 63 characters / TLD .win

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

Yeah, this is pretty much the issue. This and, "Is there any demand for these?"

@KINGOF.TOP is inferring two things here:

1. That 63 character domains with a pattern are perfect.
2. That people want them (or will want them).

The issue is that these beliefs only exist in his mind. There's no evidence to support that anyone else feels the same way (except newcomers and family members who have been convinced otherwise... but they're not the ones being asked to spend millions on these).

I mean... I just had the smelliest fart in the world. The smell is unique, and I believe that because it's the smelliest possible fart, I could bottle it, and people would pay me millions for it, because no fart could possibly be smellier. It is fart perfection. Maybe most people don't like smelling farts... but I think there are some billionaires out there who do. And I think that one day they'll find my fart and will want to buy it because it's so distinctive.

Being the "most" of something doesn't mean it's good. Being unique doesn't mean it's good. Being in love with it yourself doesn't mean it will ever be in demand.

Sometimes the maximum, and most unique of something... just stinks.

All what stinks here is your 'I mean...' / 'Sometimes...' - part of your post which exisists only in your obviously pessimistic mind (referring to 63.DOMAINS).

For me, your disgusting and paltry 'comparison' (in fact it's not a comparison - it's nothing more than just an evidence of howww small is your understanding of this kind of contemporary virtual art / domain creativity) is a typical reaction from someone who obviously only believe in 'rational' things.
If you would knowww that this world (especially the art world, equal if virtual or not) is full of 'irrational things' which have a 'rational core / message', you would see the deep sense in those domains.

Your 'mental effusion' just showww me that you are complete ignorant against the fact that...
...those domains are made of the the cleanest high end logical patterns which can be created
...the highest / tallest / fastest (of whatever) is a global symbol of success
...the term top means top

Being the most / highest / largest possible of something has a global tradition in mathematics, architects, automotive, sports, tech, internet, economy etc. - believe it or not.
At the point where you will realize this fact, you will undersstand that 63.DOMAINS are symbolising / 'mirroring' exactly that in a virtual way.

If you would use your precious time / hidden potential of creativity to create your own art (for example great domains) instead of making a ridiculous & distorting picture of this high end virtual domain art, you may will have success.
But as long as you are trying to 'destroy others (in this case my) efforts (in my case 'to bring social facts in a creative virtual way into society')' you will fail.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

Why bother so much? You can get a SLD say top.com and register any domain under that SLD with n x 63 characters....

I am sure, in fact you knowww that a SLD (sub level domain) is not a TLD (top level domain).
That's why.

Also, your example (regardless of your S/TLD point) 'top.com' is not matching becasue 'top.com' contains just 1 top. So the only example (regardless of your S/TLD point) which would make sense here would / can only be 'top.top' because 'top.top' contains 2 top's.
But also with a SLD you can't reach the most top's with 'top.top' - at the end you simply need
'toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top' (21 times top = 63 characters + TLD .top) to reach the most possible top's.

Here you can find a detailed reaction to this S/TLD point:
https://www.namepros.com/threads/63-character-domain-name-sold-for-800.967064/page-7#post-5703921

So there is nooo wayyy to top it.
It's just a given fact / circumstance which I use.
The result of it is the highest possible domain which can exist.

 

[HotKey]

I am still wondering who are such buyers and why do they buy such names?

This one has a couple factors going for it that may have appealed to the buyer: It's the highest 63 character repeating numerical, with all the other dot-coms taken. I believe it's also got the oldest registration date of any 63 digit domain out there - in any TLD. It's the jackpot as far as a long domain name investor/collector might be concerned.

AND HERE IT IS

999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.plus

I see where you were going with this one, but I'm not quite sure it fits the bill. If you are going to use the TLD to determine the total measurement, having .plus as the extension, or .top or the others you have mentioned really don't add anything but a theoretical yield. They aren't a part of the total whole.

63 numericals are part of the Novemdecillion family, meaning a 1 with 60 zeros after it. So if you have 999...top, 999....plus, basically that novemdecillion ends at the dot. It doesn't carry over. However, such is not the case when .one is used. Check it out:

999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.one
=
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1
=
999 novemdecillion
999 octodecillion
999 septendecillion
999 sexdecillion
999 quindecillion
999 quattuordecillion
999 tredecillion
999 duodecillion
999 undecillion
999 decillion
999 nonillion
999 octillion
999 septillion
999 sextillion
999 quintillion
999 quadrillion
999 trillion
999 billion
999 million
999 thousand
999.one

Basically, with using dot-one, this number is not theoretical, but a valid, complete, makes sense numerical. It surpasses any other form of a novemdecillion domain in a tangible way - even by just a point. Can you dig it?

 

[-EM-]

There is no such longest domain since you can add a dot and make that domain unlimited long. However this is not the case for the shortest domain....

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

There is no such longest domain since you can add a dot and make that domain unlimited long. However this is not the case for the shortest domain....

Apart from the fact that there is not just one longest domain (because every domain can have the same maximum length), your statement is simply wrong.

The maximum number of a characters in a domain name (left side of the dot) in the DNS system is 63 characters.
The maximum complete length of a sub.sub.sub.subdomain (inkl. all dots and ink. the TLD) is 253 characters.

I already explained it with the absolute ultimate domain (my toptoptop... .top) as example here:
https://www.namepros.com/threads/63-character-domain-name-sold-for-800.967064/page-7#post-5703921

And here you can find another site which is explaining it in detail:
http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/16996/maximum-domain-name-length

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

This one has a couple factors going for it that may have appealed to the buyer: It's the highest 63 character repeating numerical, with all the other dot-coms taken. I believe it's also got the oldest registration date of any 63 digit domain out there - in any TLD. It's the jackpot as far as a long domain name investor/collector might be concerned.



I see where you were going with this one, but I'm not quite sure it fits the bill. If you are going to use the TLD to determine the total measurement, having .plus as the extension, or .top or the others you have mentioned really don't add anything but a theoretical yield. They aren't a part of the total whole.

63 numericals are part of the Novemdecillion family, meaning a 1 with 60 zeros after it. So if you have 999...top, 999....plus, basically that novemdecillion ends at the dot. It doesn't carry over. However, such is not the case when .one is used. Check it out:

999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.one
=
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.1
=
999 novemdecillion
999 octodecillion
999 septendecillion
999 sexdecillion
999 quindecillion
999 quattuordecillion
999 tredecillion
999 duodecillion
999 undecillion
999 decillion
999 nonillion
999 octillion
999 septillion
999 sextillion
999 quintillion
999 quadrillion
999 trillion
999 billion
999 million
999 thousand
999.one

Basically, with using dot-one, this number is not theoretical, but a valid, complete, makes sense numerical. It surpasses any other form of a novemdecillion domain in a tangible way - even by just a point. Can you dig it?

Interesting but not one TLD can top a TLD which is called .top

.top stands over all (words and digits, equal if it is a novemdecillion or just one).
.one is not a digit, it is the word for the digit 1.
.com may (yet) be more known but it never can reach the superlative meaning like .top has.

That's why 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.top is the ultimate highest digit domain of all time.

 

[Joe N]

All what stinks here is your 'I mean...' / 'Sometimes...' - part of your post which exisists only in your obviously pessimistic mind (referring to 63.DOMAINS).

For me, your disgusting and paltry 'comparison' (in fact it's not a comparison - it's nothing more than just an evidence of howww small is your understanding of this kind of contemporary virtual art / domain creativity) is a typical reaction from someone who obviously only believe in 'rational' things.
If you would knowww that this world (especially the art world, equal if virtual or not) is full of 'irrational things' which have a 'rational core / message', you would see the deep sense in those domains.

Your 'mental effusion' just showww me that you are complete ignorant against the fact that...
...those domains are made of the the cleanest high end logical patterns which can be created
...the highest / tallest / fastest (of whatever) is a global symbol of success
...the term top means top

Being the most / highest / largest possible of something has a global tradition in mathematics, architects, automotive, sports, tech, internet, economy etc. - believe it or not.
At the point where you will realize this fact, you will undersstand that 63.DOMAINS are symbolising / 'mirroring' exactly that in a virtual way.

If you would use your precious time / hidden potential of creativity to create your own art (for example great domains) instead of making a ridiculous & distorting picture of this high end virtual domain art, you may will have success.
But as long as you are trying to 'destroy others (in this case my) efforts (in my case 'to bring social facts in a creative virtual way into society')' you will fail.

Show attachment 38494

I completely understand how you view your own domains. But if you're going to create so many threads on here, and invite opinions, you can't take them personally.

I was just making the point that you can call anything art. Anything! It doesn't mean that anyone else sees it as such, or sees any value in it at all.

It's great that you're being creative and enjoying it. It's definitely unique. I just don't think anyone else sees your domains the way you do.

Some more "art":

 

[Fancy.domains]

It's like arguing that ZZ TOP is the best band ever, because it has repeating letters and ends with 'top'.

 

[dordomai]

don't inspire him. He will soon post his new zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..zzzz.top domain

 

[daica85]

does anyone take this: xyzxyz.....(20times)xyz.xyz. I think this's a cool name to invest :D

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

I completely understand how you view your own domains. But if you're going to create so many threads on here, and invite opinions, you can't take them personally.

I was just making the point that you can call anything art. Anything! It doesn't mean that anyone else sees it as such, or sees any value in it at all.

It's great that you're being creative and enjoying it. It's definitely unique. I just don't think anyone else sees your domains the way you do.

Some more "art":

Yesss unfortunately there is also 'disgusting art' in this world.

But 63.DOMAINS are the complete opposite of anything disgusting - they are simply based on total smart logic considerations.
So every trying to 'compare' them with disgusting art is just myopic.

You are trying to turn them into / 'compare' them with 'gaga art' - that's nonsense because in fact they have deep sense (mirroring the 'real' world in a a 'virtual' way).

They are like pendants to all 'maximum' in real world - for example, the highest buildings (architecture is also art).

63.DOMAINS are the 'world wide webs's highest (virtual) buildings'.
And you can be sure, that I am not the only one who sees the high sense / big value behind them.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

It's like arguing that ZZ TOP is the best band ever, because it has repeating letters and ends with 'top'.

No, just 'repeating letters' isn't enough - it's the (maximum possible) number of them which counts in this context.
Your band has just 2 z's while in 'real' world there are (theoretically) endless z's possible.

But in the domain zzz... ...z.top (63 z's) you can find the maximum number of z in combination with the ultimate TLD .top which means that this is the highest z domain which (can) exist(s).

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

don't inspire him. He will soon post his new zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..zzzz.top domain

It's never wrong to inspire others, but in this case I inspired myself - I posted it already as you can see here:
https://www.namepros.com/threads/63-character-domain-name-sold-for-800.967064/page-9#post-5709596

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

does anyone take this: xyzxyz.....(20times)xyz.xyz. I think this's a cool name to invest :D

21 times xyz / TLD .xyz is already taken.
I don't recommend to invest in 20 times / 60 characters if there are 21 times / 63 characters possible.

 

[N-A]

+++ NEWWWS +++

Since 24 hours I am the newww owwwner of those 26 awwwesome 63.DOMAINS - they are all pure 63 L:

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.top
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb.top
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc.top
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd.top
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.top
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff.top
ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.top
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.top
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.top
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj.top
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.top
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.top
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.top
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.top
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.top
ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp.top
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq.top
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.top
sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.top
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.top
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.top
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.top
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.top
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.top
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.top
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.top

And since 1 year I already have those one - they are all pure 63 N:

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.top
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.top
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222.top
333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333.top
444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444.top
555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555.top
666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666.top
777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777.top
888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888.top
999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.top

Now I own all alphabetic letters from A - Z and all digits from 0 - 9 in the highest TLD.
Noww I am even more relaxed.
Nowww I am really the king of .top and...

Show attachment 38222

...the king of 63 character domains

Show attachment 38223

Those pictures let me remember how big we can be when we realize how tiny we are.
I always try to be / work with an open domainded.
Those domains will have a bright future.
The more I believe it, the more it will come true.

Don't follow me / my domains or buyyy them if you don't believe it.

All the best.

Only about a $20 investment through Alpnames. Though, still a waste of $20.