lol you are not going to reason with this guy. He really thinks there is a chance that epik copied and pasted paypals agreement because of a paypal requirement
1. You are in fintech compliance and you didn't know that for almost 10 years Braintree is owned by PayPal? Just like with Venmo (owned by paypal) you will see PayPal in their agreement
https://venmo.com/legal/us-user-agreement/
2. The lawinsider link is a sample only, to see how it is really used, google the words "Limitations are implemented to help protect" and you will see that normal companies will put their own name in place on paypal.
3. If PayPal's legal department comes across the Masterbucks page, they will probably shut down their account. If they think the bad rep Masterbucks now has is causing damage to PayPal, they might sue. They might claim that people could be misled to think Masterbucks and Paypal are related because on the page it says " we may take action to protect PayPal, our users,
a third party"
https://masterbucks.com/restricted This looks like MB is paypal and there are third parties.
4. People risk losing their paypal account and destroying their business if they follow your advice. Please edit your post or ask for deletion because NP is high on search engines and someone might blindly think you know what you are talking about. You might even get sued given you claimed you have credentials in the world of compliance.
5. I am asking the users on here to use a little more common sense. A few hundred thousand sites including Dan, GoDaddy etc use paypal to make payouts. None of them have anything like this in their agreement. What happened here is Epic probably told developers they are the next paypal, and the guys went and copied and pasted from paypal.
In their privacy police they are linking to the latimes, is that also something in compliance they need to do because on an api?
6. Just like companies get in trouble for using stolen images and they blame it on a designer, stealing text, agreements etc get companies in trouble too.