Yuran
Established Member
- Impact
- 200
I'm the only one who thinks this kind of disturbs the market?
Last edited:
Even many coms, I think they should not be priced at 280$, at least this is not good for most domain investors. I did find that some domain names should be priced above 1,000$. Of course this is just my personal opinionDefine "Good names" share some with us
i wonder is it Sav owner or domainers? all grabbed drops automatically priced with bin around $300.
Hello All. Sav does not own any domains (aside from sav.com and a few others to run our infrastructure).
Even many coms, I think they should not be priced at 280$, at least this is not good for most domain investors. I did find that some domain names should be priced above 1,000$. Of course this is just my personal opinion
Hello All. Sav does not own any domains (aside from sav.com and a few others to run our infrastructure).
Well now they they got afternic feed listing, what many people are saying by undervaluing their pricing at a flat rate, many of you not knowingly will lose sales over the lifetime of this pricing campaign. At least Huge domains puts their prices at 4 figures. All I can say stop supporting companies that work against you, and defelct and responsibility with nonsense answers. You are paying them to compete against you.
If they're undervalued @ $280, buy 'em.
Some people out there just want to earn a steady living, not get rich.
Unless I see some of these amazing $280 domains I am competing against, I can't take it seriously.