Have you also worked with Booth to gather his portion of the data? That’s the only way your material from Rebecca’s side holds weight imo.
James Booth is never replying to Grilled in my opinion.
@BoothDomains -- Can we be frank?
One of the reasons why I have requested the items I have requested is not only to find & log info that will help find the alleged hacker / thief, but I am also requesting it to collaborate with Rebecca's statements / technical facts. If you have info that suggests Rebecca definitively did actually sell you (or Jack/Jake) CQD.com, then I need to see it so I can stop wasting my time.
Right now, the facts strongly suggest she was hacked in multiple ways. She is working with law enforcement, and is preparing to take the necessary steps to subpoena said information.
Let me give you an example, where I falsely grilled Rebecca with an inference that she was selectively deleting emails, only to be proven wrong by myself missing a technical fact.
Rebecca's Yahoo email was CC'd (as evident below) in three emails relating to
[email protected]. One of them, was originally sent from
[email protected] in December 2017 with the subject: CQD.com Domain Name.
There weren't any email timelines from [email protected], or any email of @bqdn.com for that matter.
However, a search for those emails revealed:
...she had other emails in her inbox from December 2017, so naturally I suspected something fishy.
Then combine that with a January email timeline from another domainers outreach with subject cqd.com domain
I was confused, and on that particular day, heated. Rebecca's posting of things she didn't fully understand didn't help my frustration. Both of us were semi-emotional. Rebecca vehemently denied deleting the emails. I took her word for it, and used that fire to dig deeper.
What I found, was a rookie mistake on my part, by failing to check the email filters, I missed the obvious answer. There were 29 filters in total.
Deliver to trash if:
1. Body contains: cqd.com
2. Subject contains cqd.com
3. Body / Subject contacts cqd
4. From contains [email protected]
5. From contains networksolutions
6. From contains sprint
7. From contains startlogic
8. From contains google
9. Body / Subject contains transfer
10. From contains dn.com
11. From contains [email protected]
12. From contains [email protected]
13. From contains bqdn.com
14. From contains booth.com
15. From contains escrow.com
16. From / body / subject contains escrow
17. From contains startlogic
18. From contains qq.com
19. From contains [email protected]
20. From contains [email protected]
21. Subject contains transfer
22. Body contains transfer
23. Body contains ename
24. From contains yahoo
25. From contains [email protected]
26. Subject contains tickets
27. Subject contains support
28. From contains support
29. From contains purplequail
Given the subject of both yours and Andrea's email contained cqd.com, per filter #2, these emails were delivered to trash. Where if the emails were not manually checked and moved, they were set by default to auto delete in 7 days (maybe less?)...
To be clear, Rebecca claims she didn't set any of the filters. I will go over each filter at a later date. #6 (sprint) is probably the most serious, and is being formally investigated, as it likely relates to another key piece of evidence also to be explained at a later date.
Going back to the three emails mentioned in the above Yahoo email timeline. They were found in the
[email protected] startlogic account. Only one was sent from
[email protected]. The other two were sent from
[email protected].
<< The below emails explains the 3 emails from December 2017 in the above comments Yahoo email timeline from [email protected] >>
(1)
(2)
<<below are the two email attachments from
[email protected]>>
(also note the below email screenshots from GMAIL interface were not sent from [email protected]. Rather, they were sent from [email protected])
<<<<<>>>>>
<<<<<>>>>>
(3)
<<below is the Escrow (1) attachment from the above email>>
Which explains, why I was legitimately asking if you were kidding...
I don't have time for games. I have a personal engagement that is going to pull me away for an undisclosed amount of time. A road map is being prepared for the handover to the appropriate authorities, and to Rebecca's legal team.
I know the legal route isn't Rebecca's first choice, but if you insist on leaving that as her only option (and don't give me (or her) that BS that she needs to pay your lawyer Zak Muscovitch $25k for you to return the domain. I'm not a lawyer, so maybe a competent lawyer such as
@jberryhill can use his valuable time by chiming in -- If the domain is deemed stolen, is it not considered selling a stolen domain if Rebecca pays Zak $25k for James to give Rebecca her domain back?
Regardless, and again I'm not a lawyer, but should James force Rebecca to take this to court (which will be costly), I hope Rebecca sues for the domain, plus her likely costly legal expenses.
But in a perfect world, my true hopes is this battle between James and Rebecca will cease. And the crook (ie. the alleged hacker/thief) will be caught and prosecuted. Maybe even
@Jackson Elsegood of Escrow.com will step up...
... more to come.