What's going on? A few years ago they would have never made it onto a deleted list.
Some are, but some of the .coms I've picked up recently areWords that most people haven't heard of?
Putrefact... I like that one
Some are, but some of the .coms I've picked up recently are
Coacts
Crustings
Gawpe
Pasteurises
Putrefact
Sensitised
and those don't include the urban dictionary words.
These don't strike me as words most people are familiar with.
Am I wrong here?
Some of us believe that American spellings are garbarge, and based on limited education in the Wild West. I mean, you don't even know the difference between Insure, Assure and Ensure, but then personal attacks just indicate the inadequacy of the attacker and I suspect we should stop this, so maybe you should put me on ignore. I'll probably ignore you if you can't be constructive, and continue to have problems with my logic.Stupid all of them. Crusting might be something but crustings isn’t one of the normally used forms. Coacts and gawps are second person singular conjugations. Two are British spellings.
Garbage.
Because they are crap, dot-com or not won't change that.Some are, but some of the .coms I've picked up recently are
Coacts
Crustings
Gawpe
Pasteurises
Putrefact
Sensitised
and those don't include the urban dictionary words.
I need a new dictionary then, so that I can learn words like "taxmatic" - is that like asthmatic?
I don’t know...but taxmatic sold for two grand. Check namebio.
I have heard them first, I will try to find my English teacher.Some are, but some of the .coms I've picked up recently are
Coacts
Crustings
Gawpe
Pasteurises
Putrefact
Sensitised
and those don't include the urban dictionary words.
One thing I would ask the OP - so, are you saying that even dictionary words of this low domain quality were not appearing as deletes/drops before? Because if so - then, okay! this thread has some meaning - that even crap dictionary names did not appear as available before now. Is that the case?
Which, not to belabor (belabour? lol) the point of how garbagey these names are, but - these are dot coms - typically the realm of U.S. companies/users, so British spellings that might be apposite in a .co.uk are completely out of place in a dot com. A U.S. company/user is going to look for a British spelling in its website? I don't think so.
Actually, there are plenty of better domain names that can be registered. Instead of obscure dictionary words that nobody ever uses, you would rather buy longer, less generic domains. If you combine two dictionary words you can also make some interesting (and brandable) combos.