showcase Metaverse ~ Showcase your names and Discussion Thread~

[DomainBarracksRob]

Hey all figured with the recent .io 6 figure sale and the nice .xyz sale by a follow NP member. We should open a showcase and discussion thread here.

Metaverse is a fast growing keyword, term and niche! Let's share and discuss our name and news.

I've only got One to start with but its a GOOD one my favorite ending keyword on most names.


MetaverseHub.com



Welcome!

 

[M.Rovert]

Show attachment 203807

This is from Zucks Meta presentation. Soak this in, because this sort of thing could be seeing some push back as super cringy and an attempt to simulate reality when it doesn't need to be simulated. Yeah there are some people into this on VR Chat, but those sites are obscure and not emensely popular among the masses and it's not like no one knows this shit exists, it's just that it's not that compelling.

There's going to be some push back. Not everyone is going to buy this virtual meeting bullshit for business and education. It's impractical and again, is NOT futuristic but rather a cringy looking attempt at a futuristic concept that has failed to grow popular since the last 20 years. We will cringe even harder looking back at THIS presentation in 5 years and that won't necessarily be a bad thing.

Yes it's still early and that's my point. I don't think we really know what kind if virtual social applications we *need* yet, so corps are trying to push their ideas in hopes that they'll catch on. That's how it works *sometimes*, but usually you have serious problem and your product is the solution. I have my doubts about whether or not this sort of thing will go viral (virtual meetings). It will probably grow to be more popular than it has been over the last 20 years, but that's going to be because of increased exposure to the kind if people who will be into this sort of thing... But it's not for a huge chunk of the population. I believe the majority of our population with find this vaguely interesting enough to try once or twice and that's because of how impractical and cheesy it is.

They are playing poker

 

[DT13]

Show attachment 203807

This is from Zucks Meta presentation. Soak this in, because this sort of thing could be seeing some push back as super cringy and an attempt to simulate reality when it doesn't need to be simulated. Yeah there are some people into this on VR Chat, but those sites are obscure and not emensely popular among the masses and it's not like no one knows this shit exists, it's just that it's not that compelling.

There's going to be some push back. Not everyone is going to buy this virtual meeting bullshit for business and education. It's impractical and again, is NOT futuristic but rather a cringy looking attempt at a futuristic concept that has failed to grow popular since the last 20 years. We will cringe even harder looking back at THIS presentation in 5 years and that won't necessarily be a bad thing.

Yes it's still early and that's my point. I don't think we really know what kind if virtual social applications we *need* yet, so corps are trying to push their ideas in hopes that they'll catch on. That's how it works *sometimes*, but usually you have serious problem and your product is the solution. I have my doubts about whether or not this sort of thing will go viral (virtual meetings). It will probably grow to be more popular than it has been over the last 20 years, but that's going to be because of increased exposure to the kind if people who will be into this sort of thing... But it's not for a huge chunk of the population. I believe the majority of our population with find this vaguely interesting enough to try once or twice and that's because of how impractical and cheesy it is.

This is just one capability of the Metaverse. I see it more as an extra layer over the existing internet where AR will be mainly used in daily life and you sometimes go VR.

 

[Hassanhayat]

DeMetaFi.com

 

[oldtimer]

People are not going to want to do business meetings as cartoon faces. That's bullshit. No one is going to want to spend time with friends and family as cartoon avatars. They will try it and it will be interesting but it's not going to be a regular activity for most people. Even among young people this kind of activity is very niche. Most young people I know are not that into it. They'd rather play a game. It's extremely niche and Zuck is over estimating the interest.

I fully agree that most people don't want to interact with each other as cartoon characters specially when it comes to conducting business meetings,

But you need to expand your vision beyond just what might be possible at the present time technologically and keep in mind that how Metaverse gets started and what it evolves into a few years down the road might be totally different things.

It might be 5 or 10 years into the future before we can achieve the full experience of being in the Metaverse, but with the advancements in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and mind linking technologies I can envision for the Metaverse to become as advanced as the holodeck on the Enterprise with avatars that are as real as real life and perhaps somewhere down the road people might be able to transfer their consciousness into the Cloud and just live permanently in the Metaverse.

I believe that many amazing things await us in the future specially once AI gets involved and can take us beyond just our own human abilities.

IMO

 

[NameFu]

I fully agree that most people don't want to interact with each other as cartoon characters specially when it comes to conducting business meetings,

But you need to expand your vision beyond just what might be possible at the present time technologically and keep in mind that how Metaverse gets started and what it evolves into a few years down the road might be totally different things.

It might be 5 or 10 years into the future before we can achieve the full experience of being in the Metaverse, but with the advancements in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and mind linking technologies I can envision for the Metaverse to become as advanced as the holodeck on the Enterprise with avatars that are as real as real life and perhaps somewhere down the road people might be able to transfer their consciousness into the Cloud and just live permanently in the Metaverse.

I believe that many amazing things await us in the future specially once AI gets involved and can take us beyond just our own human abilities.

IMO

Mind upload is just a fictional concept. We don't know if it's possible and regardless that's likely well over 20 - 40 years from now and we'll be sending *copies* of our minds into a virtual space. "Uploading" your consciousness into a computer is like sending your "soul", which is a religious concept. But the science of the brain is materialist in that we are a result of our brains physical mechanisms, if you transfer a copy of the information it's still where it originated, just as you would send or upload a file. You still have the original until you've destroyed it. Don't take Sci-Fi too seriously. Most of it has fantasy elements woven into scientifuc concepts.

But regardless of all of this, we are a long way from having home volumetric scanners to copy a head to toe, life like avatar our selves so that it feels like we are interacting in real life . That will come but not for another 5 - 10 years at least...then people would take virtual meetings a little more seriously, but still not as seriiusly before that kind thing is mastered. There is so much more to develop than realistic avatars to make people want to meet in a virtual space for simply communicating. Gamified virtual meetings have been around for 20 years though. It's called gaming and it's not the metaverse.

Meeting someone in a virtual room with avatars has been around for 20 years and that's not the metaverse either.
I think

 

[nononsense123]

@BostonDomainer focus this group back onto domain sales

 

[NameFu]

This is just one capability of the Metaverse. I see it more as an extra layer over the existing internet where AR will be mainly used in daily life and you sometimes go VR.

I've been the *only* person here repeatedly saying that the metaverse will have to be a "virtual layer atop of the internet" and you're now throwing my words back at me ...

The difference between AR and VR could be that when AR is perfected it will be a *requirement* of your daily life the way your smart phone became a daily necessity. VR has its place in society but it's not going to be something most people will need especially before it is mastered. AR requires less because it adds value to your daily life in the reality we already have. AR is going to take a lot of attention away from VR. They both have a place in society but there is a lot of cross over where they will be competing for a lot of the same activities. Then there's the mixed reality type of AR that uses a video feed in VR type head set. That is going to be in heavy use too and will could be the first kind of headset based AR that most of us will experience while the more complicated AR lenses are in R&D.

My fear is that the first AR pps for the first Apple AR glasses will be boring, indoor only based notification type applications. But I have my fingers crossed that they will pick up where other glasses have left off and progressed a step further. Let's see...

The idea about whether AR is part of the metaverse is not agreed on by everyone. I am on the fense. But I have Metaverse donains to sell so I dont mind if they're all part of the Metaverse

Anyway I love debating all of this stuff. No crystal balls but it's fun to speculate. Maybe all of our assumptions will be wrong and the future looks nothing like the corporate fantasy like ambitions that they like us to believe.

 

[oldtimer]

Mind upload is just a fictional concept. We don't know if it's possible and regardless that's likely well over 20 - 40 years from now and we'll be sending *copies* of our minds into a virtual space. "Uploading" your consciousness into a computer is like sending your "soul", which is a religious concept. But the science of the brain is materialist in that we are a result of our brains physical mechanisms, if you transfer a copy of the information it's still where it originated, just as you would send or upload a file. You still have the original until you've destroyed it. Don't take Sci-Fi too seriously. Most of it has fantasy elements woven into scientifuc concepts.

But regardless of all of this, we are a long way from having home volumetric scanners to copy a head to toe, life like avatar our selves so that it feels like we are interacting in real life . That will come but not for another 5 - 10 years at least...then people would take virtual meetings a little more seriously, but still not as seriiusly before that kind thing is mastered. There is so much more to develop than realistic avatars to make people want to meet in a virtual space for simply communicating. Gamified virtual meetings have been around for 20 years though. It's called gaming and it's not the metaverse.

Meeting someone in a virtual room with avatars has been around for 20 years and that's not the metaverse either.
I think

It all has to start somewhere,

The first step is conceptualizing an idea and then waiting for technology to catch up with our vision ( or our fantasies ) .

IMO

 

[FolioTeam]

@BostonDomainer focus this group back onto domain sales

Thread title says "and discussion thread".

As long as what is being discussed is metaverse related, I don't see the harm there

 

[sivadomains]

Now Qualcomm Wants to Help Build the Metaverse​

Snapdragon Spaces is yet another mixed reality platform designed to support the coming wave of AR glasses.​

https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/9/...sdk-snapdragon-spaces-mixed-reality-metaverse

 

[NYJimbo]

" AR glasses."

So should we be buying vr, xr, mr or ar domains ?

 

[M.Rovert]

Vr is close to reality. The price tag is what makes it out of reach so far for general consumers.

 

[blockhead]

^^ Same company (Varjo)

A New World Awaits – Varjo Is Building A Metaverse Grounded in Reality (June 24, 2021)​

13:13 "We believe that the foundation of the future metaverse will be our actual, physical reality. The programmable world that once existed only behind our screens, can now merge with our surroundings, and it will forever change the choreography of our everyday life."



Where's my wallet???!!

 

[blogspotter]

Any good sales from this thread?? Other than the ones by Sumeeth and couple other regulars

 

[Malnasi Bela]

Meta has already lost the race:

 

[Perfect Names]

From Sedo weekly sales list

metaversetechnology.com

11/04/2021

2199

USD

metaconverse.com

11/04/2021

3950

USD

betverse.com

11/07/2021

7500

USD

cmeta.com

11/05/2021

11000

EUR

metaonline.com

11/02/2021

8700

EUR

 

[NameFu]

" AR glasses."

So should we be buying vr, xr, mr or ar domains ?

"AR" is what Apple has been using in their marketing thus far. VR has been rebranded by Facebook as "Metaverse" so VR is not as buzzy of a buzzword anymore, but that's not to say there aren't anymore VR sales. I think Metaverse has a bright future as a brandword in domaining for at least the next 2 years. AR will likely pick up when Apple makes its announcement... And VR could pick back up again, because there are rumors that Apple is also releasing a VR headset. I suspect they could call it a Metaverse headset, because it will be capable of AR (with a screen and cameras rather than glass lens) and also VR. The other possibility is that they'll call it mixed reality but I think that's less likely. My bets are on AR being their main marketing word as it has been in the past.

 

[Joseph CA]

MetaMetaverse taken in over 85 extensions

Still got

MetaMetaverse .net

 

[Elad n]

MetaMetaverse taken in over 85 extensions

Still got

MetaMetaverse .net

 

[NameFu]

MetaMetaverse taken in over 85 extensions

Still got

MetaMetaverse .net

Sounds like a keyword combo that Meta would want to dominate.

 

[Joseph CA]

.

 

[Joseph CA]

I use dotdb too but it gets updated after days, for example you will not see recent registered ones like

metametaverse.news​

metametaverse.global​

Plus 50 more, or just give it a week.

Uniregistry is more accurate.

 

[Joseph CA]

 

[blockhead]

Some more .com's I've owned for a few weeks:

Mercurymeta
Venusmeta
Jupitermeta
Saturnmeta
Uranusmeta
Plutometa

 

[bolo]

Vr is close to reality. The price tag is what makes it out of reach so far for general consumers.

And the nausea. Apparently.