Dynadot
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    270 
    votes
    44.9%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    134 
    votes
    22.3%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.4%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
9
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Why not remove the ability to criticize all togther?:)

Biden Transition Official Believes the First Amendment Has a 'Design Flaw' -- His Remedy Is to Curb Free Speech


Stengel wrote last year in a Washington Post op-ed that the freedom of speech must be restricted, for “all speech is not equal. And where truth cannot drive out lies, we must add new guardrails. I’m all for protecting ‘thought that we hate,’ but not speech that incites hate.”

What kind of speech “incites hate”? As far as Stengel is concerned, the answer is any speech that Muslims find offensive. He wrote: “Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?”

Link: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...aw-his-remedy-is-to-curb-free-speech-n1144746
 
Last edited:
0
•••

You already posted that. Started in 2017

"The charity spent $56,738 on conferences and $59,356 on travel that year."

"Simon had said that the main point of the charity was not to give out grants, and that its goal was to find ways to accelerate treatment for all, regardless of their economic or cultural backgrounds."

People don't work for free, it was just starting up. No wrongdoing here, unlike Trump Foundation/University.

Biden isn't the one getting sued and having to pay out millions, that's your dude Trump.

Sorry for your loss. Again.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
And just like that, corruption is OK.

They needed to pay almost 4 million dollars in salaries and 57K in travel expenses.

You already posted that. Started in 2017

"The charity spent $56,738 on conferences and $59,356 on travel that year."

"Simon had said that the main point of the charity was not to give out grants, and that its goal was to find ways to accelerate treatment for all, regardless of their economic or cultural backgrounds."

People don't work for free, it was just starting up. No wrongdoing here, unlike Trump Foundation/University.

Biden isn't the one getting sued and having to pay out millions, that's your dude Trump.

Sorry for your loss.
 
1
•••
$4 million to raise $57 thousand for travel.

You already posted that. Started in 2017

"The charity spent $56,738 on conferences and $59,356 on travel that year."

"Simon had said that the main point of the charity was not to give out grants, and that its goal was to find ways to accelerate treatment for all, regardless of their economic or cultural backgrounds."

People don't work for free, it was just starting up. No wrongdoing here, unlike Trump Foundation/University.

Biden isn't the one getting sued and having to pay out millions, that's your dude Trump.

Sorry for your loss. Again.
 
1
•••
No wrongdoing, they were just starting up. Simple stuff to grasp
 
0
•••
1
•••
1
•••
$4 million to raise $57 thousand for travel. LOL.

I just explained it to you, you left out conferences. What part of just starting up are you not getting. No wrongdoing that’s why there won’t be any charges or any suits.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I just explained it to you, you left out conferences. What part of just starting up are you not getting. No wrongdoing that’s why there won’t be any charges or any suits.
OK. Now I'm going to post the part of the story you're covering for.

What did the “charity” not spend money on? Grants supporting cancer research efforts. That box on the IRS tax return for a non-profits lists “$0.00”.

On April 25, 2019, Biden announced his candidacy for the Democrat party’s nomination for President.

On July 15, 2019, only 2 weeks after the end of the “charity’s” fiscal year, it announced it was suspending operations.

The Daily Mail in the UK does a bit more math on the “charity’s” tax filings and finds that over $3 million in spending — of the $4.8 million raised — went to pay salaries and benefits of the organization’s staff. In addition to SImon and Carnival, three other staff positions enjoyed six-figure salaries — the Director of Communications, Director of Science Policy, and Director of Engagement — with two making $150,000+ and the other making $185,000+.

“Other expenses” totaled $1.7 million — meaning that $4.7 million of the $4.8 million raised was spent on “charity” operations.
--
upload_2020-11-15_16-9-27.png


The charity Joe Biden named after his son was a slush fund for democrat insiders. I suspect it most of that money came from the US tax payer. - Mr-X
 
Last edited:
1
•••
OK. Now I'm going to post the part of the story you're covering for.

What did the “charity” not spend money on? Grants supporting cancer research efforts. That box on the IRS tax return for a non-profits lists “$0.00”.

On April 25, 2019, Biden announced his candidacy for the Democrat party’s nomination for President.

On July 15, 2019, only 2 weeks after the end of the “charity’s” fiscal year, it announced it was suspending operations.

The Daily Mail in the UK does a bit more math on the “charity’s” tax filings and finds that over $3 million in spending — of the $4.8 million raised — went to pay salaries and benefits of the organization’s staff. In addition to SImon and Carnival, three other staff positions enjoyed six-figure salaries — the Director of Communications, Director of Science Policy, and Director of Engagement — with two making $150,000+ and the other making $185,000+.

“Other expenses” totaled $1.7 million — meaning that $4.7 million of the $4.8 million raised was spent on “charity” operations.
--


The charity Joe Biden named after his son was a slush fund for democrat insiders. I suspect it most of that money came from the US tax payer.
Click one of the links I posted yesterday about reading help
 
0
•••
Click one of the links I posted yesterday about reading help

“Other expenses” totaled $1.7 million — meaning that $4.7 million of the $4.8 million raised was spent on “charity” operations.


Joe's charity was shut down without using $1 for it stated purpose.

Give it up.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
0
•••
4
•••
0
•••
For some reason, all I see is a blank post.

I’m trying; well-known Namepros Twitter bug;
Personally, think it’s another form of censoring;

Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer):
"Conservatives are saying they're leaving Twitter and Facebook going off to Parler since they believe Parler is a safer space for them.

What we're seeing is even more of a bunker mentality in right-wing media."

"It's a threat to democracy." Click link below; fascinating 42 sec video; CNN is funny bad 🤣
twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1327690649764769800?s=20
 
Last edited:
1
•••
“Other expenses” totaled $1.7 million — meaning that $4.7 million of the $4.8 million raised was spent on “charity” operations.

Joe's charity was shut down without using $1 for it stated purpose.

Give it up.
Do you know why that amount was so low, because they were just starting up. Trump’s fine just on the university was 24 million
 
Last edited:
0
•••
1
•••
Do you know why that amount was so low, because they were just starting up. Trump’s fine just on the university was 24 million

FOR TWO YEARS THEY TOOK ALL THE MONEY FOR THEMSELVES. GAVE $0.00 TO THE STATED PURPOSE.


https://flyawa.org/ does a lot more with a lot less for people all over the world and didn't take 2 years to get started. STOP.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
FOR TWO YEARS THEY TOOK ALL THE MONEY FOR THEMSELVES. GAVE $0.00 TO THE STATED PURPOSE.
Went through that already. You seem disappointed because you thought you had something on him this time
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The difference between people who take and people who serve.

 
4
•••
Went through that already. You seem disappointed because you thought you had something on him this time

Just happy I could highlight your hypocrisy again.
 
3
•••
Went through that already. You seem disappointed because you thought you had something on him this time

dissapointed since it was reported post electio

If reported before election;

wouldve won same way; Trump ‘16 Wikileaks
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Just happy I could highlight your hypocrisy again.
You’re just highlighting your struggle to read. Lots of businesses, start ups, charities don’t pan out, the election played a part. No wrongdoing. You’re so desperate for something.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Chump change. $6.5 Billion spent on 2016 election, 2020 probably more (not including recounts etc.)

What's your point?

You know lobbyists, just like the Russians...they have their finger in the pie, no denying involvement (at least they're US soiled, lol) :xf.wink:
 
0
•••
I find it amusing that Trumpers are constantly arguing against Globalism - don't you think your leader has offshore accounts and interests abroad? Where do you think US sells 'weapons of peace?' :xf.wink:
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back