Dynadot

.tv Your latest .tv registration or acquisition

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
I think there was a similar thread in the past but it's time to open a new one.
What's the last .tv domain you've registered or acquired?
I start with it.
It's Curved.tv with a 163$ fee on Name.com...
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
4
•••
Digital.tv on Dynadot expired
Closed at $3889
123 Bids
12 Bidders
I'm not the winning bidder. Just watching the auction
 
2
•••
0
•••
3
•••
Digital.tv on Dynadot expired
Closed at $3889
123 Bids
12 Bidders
I'm not the winning bidder. Just watching the auction

They adjusted the price, closed at $3,001.
 
0
•••
1
•••
This is an error in the reporting. The original price was correct.

Well I believe @Michael gets the data straight from Dynadot so we will see.

Either way the price is horrible.
 
0
•••
Well I believe @Michael gets the data straight from Dynadot so we will see.

Either way the price is horrible.

Thanks for the feedback Eq. I was involved in the auction and am talking to Dynadot staff. There is no indication that the price changed. Will keep you posted.
 
1
•••
Thanks for the feedback Eq. I was involved in the auction and am talking to Dynadot staff. There is no indication that the price changed. Will keep you posted.

The other issue is Michael does not scrub out Dynadot sales that the original owner renewed. This means the sale never occurred. I have noticed this on numerous occasions.
 
0
•••
The other issue is Michael does not scrub out Dynadot sales that the original owner renewed. This means the sale never occurred. I have noticed this on numerous occasions.

When I see them I email @Michael and he always jumps on it. Did Gross renew this name?
 
0
•••
1
•••
I too was involved in the digital.tv auction. Last price I saw was $3,895.

Thanks
 
1
•••
They don't report to us, we download their auction spreadsheet once a minute from two different servers: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3

In theory that should be plenty often enough because they have five minute extensions if bids are placed within the last five minutes. What's unusual is that one server had $3,001 with 116 bids as the last one, and the other had $3,003 with 118 bids, both with the same end time but neither one with the correct price. All of the other auctions ending that day the two servers had the exact same data on.

This happened one other time in recent memory on Garbage.biz two weeks ago, where the two servers had two different prices and bid counts but with the same end time. In this situation though the backup server had the information exactly right, the winner emailed me and told me the correct price and it matched the backup server's data, so I fixed it.

I think it could be one of two things; either their spreadsheet generator is buggy or it is serving up cached files sometimes. I just changed both servers to add a random number to the URL each time we request it to avoid it serving up a cached file (like: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3&nocache=23059250298). But if that doesn't work I'll have to assume their CSV generator is messed up and just scrape from their front-end, although in that case I probably won't get IDNs because they don't display the punycode equivalent like they do in the CSV and converting so many in real-time is a pain.

I corrected the price on our site, thanks for the heads up. You can see it is difficult because two people in this thread watching the auction live saw two different prices as well. Hopefully the cache-busting strategy solves it though, I'll try to keep an eye on it.
 
6
•••
Registered مسلم./tv (xn--ygb8abc.tv), which means Muslim.tv in the Arabic language.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
0
•••
They don't report to us, we download their auction spreadsheet once a minute from two different servers: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3

In theory that should be plenty often enough because they have five minute extensions if bids are placed within the last five minutes. What's unusual is that one server had $3,001 with 116 bids as the last one, and the other had $3,003 with 118 bids, both with the same end time but neither one with the correct price. All of the other auctions ending that day the two servers had the exact same data on.

This happened one other time in recent memory on Garbage.biz two weeks ago, where the two servers had two different prices and bid counts but with the same end time. In this situation though the backup server had the information exactly right, the winner emailed me and told me the correct price and it matched the backup server's data, so I fixed it.

I think it could be one of two things; either their spreadsheet generator is buggy or it is serving up cached files sometimes. I just changed both servers to add a random number to the URL each time we request it to avoid it serving up a cached file (like: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3&nocache=23059250298). But if that doesn't work I'll have to assume their CSV generator is messed up and just scrape from their front-end, although in that case I probably won't get IDNs because they don't display the punycode equivalent like they do in the CSV and converting so many in real-time is a pain.

I corrected the price on our site, thanks for the heads up. You can see it is difficult because two people in this thread watching the auction live saw two different prices as well. Hopefully the cache-busting strategy solves it though, I'll try to keep an eye on it.

Thanks for the feedback Michael! Keep up the great work!

A
 
2
•••
2
•••
Regged ITO (initial token offering). Figured it was worth the risk since wallet and token fetched good amounts :)
 
5
•••
Regged ITO (initial token offering). Figured it was worth the risk since wallet and token fetched good amounts :)

Can't believe that was available! (y)
 
2
•••
They don't report to us, we download their auction spreadsheet once a minute from two different servers: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3

In theory that should be plenty often enough because they have five minute extensions if bids are placed within the last five minutes. What's unusual is that one server had $3,001 with 116 bids as the last one, and the other had $3,003 with 118 bids, both with the same end time but neither one with the correct price. All of the other auctions ending that day the two servers had the exact same data on.

This happened one other time in recent memory on Garbage.biz two weeks ago, where the two servers had two different prices and bid counts but with the same end time. In this situation though the backup server had the information exactly right, the winner emailed me and told me the correct price and it matched the backup server's data, so I fixed it.

I think it could be one of two things; either their spreadsheet generator is buggy or it is serving up cached files sometimes. I just changed both servers to add a random number to the URL each time we request it to avoid it serving up a cached file (like: https://www.dynadot.com/market/auction/auctions.csv?keyword=&order_by=3&nocache=23059250298). But if that doesn't work I'll have to assume their CSV generator is messed up and just scrape from their front-end, although in that case I probably won't get IDNs because they don't display the punycode equivalent like they do in the CSV and converting so many in real-time is a pain.

I corrected the price on our site, thanks for the heads up. You can see it is difficult because two people in this thread watching the auction live saw two different prices as well. Hopefully the cache-busting strategy solves it though, I'll try to keep an eye on it.

Thanks for the explanation Michael.
 
0
•••
1
•••
Hogar.tv (Home in Spanish)
 
0
•••
2
•••
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back