No one here is blaming the world.
A potential buyer who feels he was wronged in a transaction is sharing his experience. Many here are grateful that he's making us aware of the business practises of the seller.
This is the issue and I am going to try and be clear so I don't get misconstrued as thinking that reneging on a deal is an acceptable practice.
The original post did NOT provide a warning against a user. That was NOT the intent because no member was even mentioned.
The original post said:
"I told him he needs to refund the money to the buyer and sell the names to me as we agreed,"
and
"I want to give him the last chance to do it right!!!"
Later a thread was posted that had no relation to the deal. It was simply a "make offer" thread initiated by the seller.
In my opinion, the OP was basically threatening to out someone as a bad businessman unless they compounded the problem (if even possible) by reversing a sale with another party. The conversation was all held in PM and none of it was shared so it was a very one sided account of an agreement that may or may not have had wishy-washy language.
There are a number of posts that are starting to appear like this. I *think* someone here at Namepros is messing with my auctions at GoDaddy and I need to out them... I think buyers might be locking my names with fake offers... someone sold a domain and it was removed from my account! In another thread
@Joe Styler showed an
example where a seller can be seen as in the wrong even though they did nothing wrong.
My suggestion is simple and it will keep this type of thread about legalities, morals and ethics out of what is otherwise a great forum with great people that do transactions every day.
When you make an offer or agreement include the main elements:
The price of the name in appropriate currency (i.e. 1000 USD)
The method of payment. Including specific timing (i.e. Paypal by Feb 8th 2016 5pm EST - Fees covered by seller)
The method and time of transfer. Account change at Registrar initiated by Buyer after payment made and performed within 3 days of request.
Contract is non-binding until payment is made (unless the timing is agreed to prevent front-running)
Then you agree on an the offer acceptance with the main elements of a contract included.
At this point there is no misunderstanding, no confusion. If there is a violation of the agreement with a member of NP then by all means post a very direct post:
This
@User (tagged so they know) screwed me by violation of the terms agreed. Then post terms and violation.
It's then a simple black and white issue instead of a he said, she said, grey area issue. Do you think in 6 months people are going to find this thread and identify the user with the issue? Hardly likely. It's just a mess of discussing morality and ethics in a forum.
For those of you who say that the people that are saying "move on" and "man up" (?) and don't understand because they are social users of a forum (my god, what a crime) and don't do business here you should understand that part of doing business is proper contracts and financial management. A couple of short PMs isn't good enough - really you should all be receiving invoices and receipts to book your expenses properly... probably too much like hard work.
If you want to claim you are professional business people then you should do business like professional business people. Just imho, of course, as someone with a low trader rating
And I will say again. Taking the high road is sometime good for your OWN reputation. Clearly my reputation is damaged because people think I'm saying it's ok to renege on deals despite me clearly stating the issue is that the "deals" aren't clear in the first place. I'm advocating fixing the root cause (again, maybe too much hard work).