Domain Empire

domains Why Is China Investing in Domain Names? Here's the Answer

Spaceship
Have you ever wondered why Chinese investors have turned to buying domain names? Over the past couple of years, we've seen the market for two-letter .com, three-letter .com, four-letter .com, two-number .com, three-number.com, four-number .com, and five-number .com heating up with prices steadily rising.

Every week there are reports of rare two-letter and three-number .COM domains being sold to China, with leading domain investor George Kirikos estimating that 19.4% of all two-letter .COM domains are owned by companies or investors in China.

What has brought about this surge in acquisitions? I asked the team at DN.com if they could help us answer this question. DN.com is an international domain name escrow platform, who are also affiliates of the popular Chinese marketplace 4.CN. 4.CN's parent company are listed on the WhoIs information for many of the most valuable domains in existence.

The first question I asked was, "What has changed in recent years that made domain names a desirable investment asset?"

DN.com told us:

Everything has changed. The overall economy is much more advanced. Plus the fluctuation of the stock market caused many people to withdraw their funds from the market. They are re-investing those funds into new areas, like domain names.

Since the quantity of premium names are limited, and demand has risen, it has driven the price to a new level. We still are amazed, everything seems to be unreasonable, yet it is still going on.

This summer the Chinese stock market crashed, with markets nosediving 8.5% on 24th August. According to some analysts, around 1 in 30 people in China owns stocks of some kind, accounting for 20% of a household's wealth.

As DN.com said above, this uncertainty in the stock market has seen many investors withdrawing their money and placing their faith in domain names.

In recent weeks, we have seen a vast number of four-letter .COM sales, most fetching well over $1,000 and there have been questions - especially in threads on the NamePros forums - about how these domains are being used, and whether Chinese investors will look to sell to other investors or end users as markets rise.

DN.com told us:

I believe that only a few are targeting end-users. The IT industry has entered into a new phase, the capital market has become more and more level-headed, hence the start-ups. Even long existing IT companies are influenced by the change. I believe that most investors are investing because of the rarity and uniqueness of domain names.

Recently, a bunch of Chinese investors registered thousands of names over one night, to be honest, I don't understand the reason why.

This comment is referring to the registration of numerical, four-letter, and letter-number combination domains in various TLDs. For example, at the end of October there was a report here on NamePros by @djum stating that all English Premium LLLL.net domains have now been registered - with 5,020 being registered in one day.

DN.com's beliefs regarding investments based upon the rarity and uniqueness of domain names are backed up by the fact that two- to four- letter .COM's and two- to six- number .COM's have risen quickly in value, with domains including patterns and repeating characters being considered more valuable.

A data website I use is LLLLsales.com to track recent four-letter .COM sales. Their charts show a continuing upward trend in four-letter Chinese premium .COM, but how long will that trend last? Will Chinese investors still be investing in domains in five or ten years time?

DN.com have these comments to make:

It's hard to say, no one knows the future. From our point of view, as the value of CNY continues to decrease, people will tend to invest those funds into something that would maintain the value, i.e. gold, real estate, and to some, domain names. So I believe that investors will still be buying in the coming 2 years.



Thanks to @Eric Lyon and DN.com for helping with the creation of this article.
 
Last edited:
44
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
If anyone was involved with bitcoin/and altcoins over the last two years you will all notice similarities in the investment patterns. Its all just a way for a communist country to move money.
 
0
•••
0
•••
hooe nobody will give that evil idea to him : )
 
0
•••
The Chinese are going nuts for for 4 letter .com names.
I own one which I've had for a few years, and even when I bought it, was surprised it was available, as it could easily be used for a massive Japanese company known in the sports entertainment industry.
Chinese investors have been offering me $100's for it, but I'm still not selling.
 
0
•••
The Chinese are going nuts for for 4 letter .com names.
I own one which I've had for a few years, and even when I bought it, was surprised it was available, as it could easily be used for a massive Japanese company known in the sports entertainment industry.
Chinese investors have been offering me $100's for it, but I'm still not selling.
It is wise to refuse the offer.
 
0
•••
Indians and in general all asian countries are facing lot of Ponzi schemes truble and no one knows how it works !!!
Government knows but do not takes actions as politicians are also in these schemes !!
the only one who is ruin ed is a poor doing hard work and investing earnings of life time !!
Bitter truth !!
 
0
•••
What you mean by no one knows how it works?

We know how it works Sir as we are well educated. Specifically if we talk about my country (India ) many are unaware of economical investments, trends, changes, challenges etc . They are simply uneducated in economy and investment wise. Many ponzi schema are going on currently I face at-least a one relative per month asking me for investment and tell them this is scam and all but no effect. Unless they are getting payment they keep on approaching new targets and thus schema goes on.

Thank you sir !!
 
0
•••
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back