alert Wow, pretty amazing .xyz scam?

[Arjun Oli]

 

[JimmySun]

Blockchain domains have their own competition, and until I can sense which blockchain browser (which blockchain domain names are friendly to them) or public chain will win out in the future, I won't be able to tell which blockchain domain will be worth selling, until then we can talk, but in case everything is unpredictable I did secured a little bit hns, zns, eth, sol, tez that I like.

 

[JimmySun]

The other thing is the blockchain technology is mainly kind of a decentralized data center, the only purpose of domain name is to define a wallet(hash) address, if xyz can be recognized by blockchain name servers the same way with the blockchain domain name, nothing big deal to talk about which is true web3 domain name, in my view is that one is regulated by ICANN one is by your own key, but honestly I believe once a blockchain registry wanted to block your domain name some registries are still able to do that because blockchain don't define laws, as such you could say everything is narrative.
moreover, If xyz can be resolved by multiple BNS, taking more places than other BDN, then it still can be the best choice for web3 companies.
Too bad some people can't see how huge potential of .xyz has.

 

[dirk]

seems you don't understand what gives a domain extension value. The global adoption rate of an domain extension is from its reputation, you could say that the function of all domain names are the same, but a large value derived from its image, .com is famous because it issued earlier and carried with good meaning(company, commercial etc.) nothing more, HNS allows you to create a domain extension does that mean the fame of the extension itself depends on adopters's own promotion? This largely limits its potential in value, which is an adverse condition to domainers, I am not saying HNS is bad, on the contrary I think HNS is a good project but as an investor's point of view it just needed to wait longer.

All this and additional posts are a perfect example of what issue I'm raising about people bringing web3/chain/dec into the discussion when we're talking about .xyz.

My point is, xyz isn't hns/web3 so the argument oftentimes raised is nonsense.

Do niche related companies use and like the tld? Yes. Would they still prefer .com/cctld? Most definitely.

 

[JimmySun]

All this and additional posts are a perfect example of what issue I'm raising about people bringing web3/chain/dec into the discussion when we're talking about .xyz.

My point is, xyz isn't hns/web3 so the argument oftentimes raised is nonsense.

Do niche related companies use and like the tld? Yes. Would they still prefer .com/cctld? Most definitely.

Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some contexts, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.

 

[Tom_Collins]

Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some context, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.

I always thought xyz domains are a marketing front to attract GEN X, Y, Z??

I have not seen ANY cryptocurrency using xyz. Some might...but not the major players.

 

[JimmySun]

I always thought xyz domains are a marketing front to attract GEN X, Y, Z??

I have not seen ANY cryptocurrency using xyz. Some might...but not the major players.

You mean like block.xyz?

 

[Tom_Collins]

You mean like block.xyz?

lol block.xyz is not a cryptocurrency. Do some research before you throw blockchain related terms to prove a point.

 

[JimmySun]

lol block.xyz is not a cryptocurrency. Do some research before you throw blockchain related terms to prove a point.

Ok, my bad and actually I realized that earlier, Xyz wasn't popular during the cryptocurrency launch boom and that doesn't affect xyz gaining places in web3 niche.

 

[dirk]

Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some contexts, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.

Yes I do get the point. And that's not the case now. Lots of ifs.

Same could be said about any other tld.

Like .com. I have no doubt it would easily outperform any other extension if on Blockchain.

But we're digressing and I'm sure the same thing is being discussed in the XYZ thread, if there is one

 

[NickB]

So much Bollo*cks being spoke about this extension it's unreal.......someone's doing well with it...great......move on and do your own thing, but the constant ass kissing and lack of critical thought is a joke......

Question anything about it and you are classed as a troll

*I hold several .xyz domains and have sold one 1 this year, so nothing personal against the extension but the people pumping and promoting it are doing more harm than good......

 

[bmugford]

Show attachment 214538

So much Bollo*cks being spoke about this extension it's unreal.......someone's doing well with it...great......move on and do your own thing, but the constant ass kissing and lack of critical thought is a joke......

Question anything about it and you are classed as a troll

*I hold several .xyz domains and have sold one 1 this year, so nothing personal against the extension but the people pumping and promoting it are doing more harm than good......

You are just a hater.

Brad

 

[Jim H]

Only when more people succeed or not can it be proved.

 

[ixex]

I like .abc more than .xyz
But .com is the worst.

Can you display results that show what you mean/backup.. by ".com is the worst" Folks here and I believe anywhere will have a hard time digesting this. Thanks

 

[BRANDERX]

What's interesting is that the OP started a thread with a clickbait title, included a screenshot with zero context, & did not participate in the thread..

hmmm...

IMO

 

[bmugford]

What's interesting is that the OP started a thread with a clickbait title, included a screenshot with zero context, & did not participate in the thread..

hmmm...

IMO

Valid.

 

[BrandEntrance.com]

Those sales are pretty good.

 

[Wesley S]

op is contemplating whether to buy an expensive .xyz and wants to see where the pendulum swings before diving in, thats all. Make your own mind up whether you want to invest in .xyz, @swetha has made a go of it and so has others. Some people arent diving in thats all. Its another tld.

 

[Wesley S]

its kinda insulting also because alot of people believe in their domains and think they have made a wise business choice for someone just to come around and start something up because they want to dabble is very dangerous territory.

 

[Wesley S]

this isnt @swetha, https://www.namepros.com/threads/just-made-my-first-6-figure-sale-xyz.1271390/

 

[Wesley S]

this isnt @swetha, https://www.namepros.com/threads/just-made-my-first-6-figure-sale-xyz.1271390/

wasnt a dot com, how do you think he will go thru life now? How dot com is the king? No, he will be impressed with himself that he made a 6 figure sell with dot xyz, that is how he will go forward.