Here is a link to a report on a conference regarding the future of the mobile internet, and quite likely the dot mobi extension.
http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9824587-37.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
This is one interesting quote where they question if the future of wireless is with full content websites or stripped down mobi-type versions.
"Do operating system vendors try to make wide-open devices that can run anything, or clamp down on the number and types of applications to make more reliable and secure devices? Do they press the limits of a cell phone at the cost of performance, or do they acquiesce to those constraints with stripped-down applications and Web pages that work, but aren't as meaningful? Should they find ways to go around carriers that are reluctant to give up control of the devices that run on their networks, or work with the carriers to find ways of helping them make money? Anybody who says they know for sure is lying."
Sounds like the mobi debate is strong even at the top, though mobi isn't specifically mentioned.
What we need is Google to push for mobi as the way of the future. Simple, cheap, reliable, and most importantly "compatible" with all devices. Perhaps they are allowing others to come to that conclusion, while promoting it behind the scenes.
Interesting that since they have announced their Android software, Google are sitting front and centre at these conferences these days and they are the one who everyone is deferring to.
Regards,
Sags
http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9824587-37.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
This is one interesting quote where they question if the future of wireless is with full content websites or stripped down mobi-type versions.
"Do operating system vendors try to make wide-open devices that can run anything, or clamp down on the number and types of applications to make more reliable and secure devices? Do they press the limits of a cell phone at the cost of performance, or do they acquiesce to those constraints with stripped-down applications and Web pages that work, but aren't as meaningful? Should they find ways to go around carriers that are reluctant to give up control of the devices that run on their networks, or work with the carriers to find ways of helping them make money? Anybody who says they know for sure is lying."
Sounds like the mobi debate is strong even at the top, though mobi isn't specifically mentioned.
What we need is Google to push for mobi as the way of the future. Simple, cheap, reliable, and most importantly "compatible" with all devices. Perhaps they are allowing others to come to that conclusion, while promoting it behind the scenes.
Interesting that since they have announced their Android software, Google are sitting front and centre at these conferences these days and they are the one who everyone is deferring to.
Regards,
Sags




