Vida.com and now lets.com is also back in auction. I assume the winning bidders could not pay up. (This link sure is interesting )
Vida.com originally went for $70,000 and Lets.com originally went for $31,500. Now they are both back in auction. But instead of starting a new auction, the new high bidders are the users who bid last month.
Are these people obligated to buy the domain? After all, their bids were placed weeks ago and interest in the domain and financial situation could change from that time out.
Imagine if you placed a losing $30,000 bid on a domain. You later find a better domain the the price. One month later, you find that you have to pay for an old bid.
Also do the users who failed to pay have their account suspended indefinitely or temporarily?
Vida.com originally went for $70,000 and Lets.com originally went for $31,500. Now they are both back in auction. But instead of starting a new auction, the new high bidders are the users who bid last month.
Are these people obligated to buy the domain? After all, their bids were placed weeks ago and interest in the domain and financial situation could change from that time out.
Imagine if you placed a losing $30,000 bid on a domain. You later find a better domain the the price. One month later, you find that you have to pay for an old bid.
Also do the users who failed to pay have their account suspended indefinitely or temporarily?











