By backorder I meant this:
An enduser wants to buy a domain.
Knows about Godaddy only, and goes there.
Searches for a domain.
It is not available, but "can be backordered".
Pays refundable $ 60 to Godaddy with the hope of getting it.
And then what happens, this is what I ask.
Now is GD's purpose to secure prices at both ends and take the difference as profit , or just take 20 percent of the unique selling price.
In the first case, the price would be as low as possible, and in the second case, as high as possible. First one would be unethical, and worse than shillbidding.
I'm not blaming GD, just mentioning GD because it is big.
We get price requests or offers at AN and Sedo, and we are not given enough (if any) info about the buyer. If we did, this would mean more and better sales, and logically this should be good for those marketplaces as well. But since they insist on hiding buyer's info (and strangely showing seller's info) there must be an agenda behind this. Either: prevent good sales, or secure prices at both ends and take difference (abuse of power, selling domains they don't own). This is the single most important problem in domaining in my opinion (if it is a problem).
Dan is better in this sense, but they show seller's info, and then buyers don't pay.