I had posted this in the other thread... but I went so far off topic I thought it unfair. Better you all ignore this than get upset I messed up the other thread.
I was thinking more about this and was thinking that tech.tv was too generic for any specific end user. Potential end users are groups that already have brands (wired/techcrunch etc)
But then I thought about what I had said in an earlier thread which is that the "extension" is going away. What will occur is a transition to brands first away from pure keywords... but more than individual brands.. I'm talking portal type brands. Facebook has the "friends" angle sewed up... But it is the GENERIC nature of tech that makes it SOOOO great.
Tech.tv could have wired and techcrunch as CHANNELS. The future is all about marketing channels.
noticias is similar but has the disadvantage that the news media are already channel providers... and frankly - google/yahoo etc is the biggest provider of news (or Twitter if you count that mess as news). Similarly for shopping... we will, whether you like it or not, all transition to just portlets under Amazon.com and a few other private brands.
Ok - so the extension hasn't gone away for the top guy - the "brand". I'd really love to see this Tech TV not be a single site but an aggregation site.... you want information on the new iPad? We have 100 sponsored reviews right here from your other sites. They could be iPad.in, wired.com/stuff.
This would take huge $$$ and will never happen... but it would be interesting to see....
England for the same reason...the Hotel Channel, the History Channel, the Vacation Channel.... marketing channels rule
I'd be concerned though that it would be possible for someone to create "England" like the british govt/tourist boards. http://england/hotels http://england/manchester/jobs Now that would kick England.tv to the kerb.
Truth is this. If the semantic web is every going to make it... it will be controlled by very careful management of gLTDs and private clouds. The move is about separation of large brands for the masses FROM the masses. The arguments are being formed already - see Canon, see fighting spam solutions....
The change is coming. In 10 years... the internet as you know it will be gone. By then I hope your portfolio is empty.
On the bright side... I think the last two cash outs will be dotCOM and dotTV.
This is the basis behind how I picked my crappy few .TV domains. I'll write up a long post on what and why and let you all laugh some more at my crazier than than the antifan.tv beliefs.:hearts:
I was thinking more about this and was thinking that tech.tv was too generic for any specific end user. Potential end users are groups that already have brands (wired/techcrunch etc)
But then I thought about what I had said in an earlier thread which is that the "extension" is going away. What will occur is a transition to brands first away from pure keywords... but more than individual brands.. I'm talking portal type brands. Facebook has the "friends" angle sewed up... But it is the GENERIC nature of tech that makes it SOOOO great.
Tech.tv could have wired and techcrunch as CHANNELS. The future is all about marketing channels.
noticias is similar but has the disadvantage that the news media are already channel providers... and frankly - google/yahoo etc is the biggest provider of news (or Twitter if you count that mess as news). Similarly for shopping... we will, whether you like it or not, all transition to just portlets under Amazon.com and a few other private brands.
Ok - so the extension hasn't gone away for the top guy - the "brand". I'd really love to see this Tech TV not be a single site but an aggregation site.... you want information on the new iPad? We have 100 sponsored reviews right here from your other sites. They could be iPad.in, wired.com/stuff.
This would take huge $$$ and will never happen... but it would be interesting to see....
England for the same reason...the Hotel Channel, the History Channel, the Vacation Channel.... marketing channels rule
I'd be concerned though that it would be possible for someone to create "England" like the british govt/tourist boards. http://england/hotels http://england/manchester/jobs Now that would kick England.tv to the kerb.
Truth is this. If the semantic web is every going to make it... it will be controlled by very careful management of gLTDs and private clouds. The move is about separation of large brands for the masses FROM the masses. The arguments are being formed already - see Canon, see fighting spam solutions....
The change is coming. In 10 years... the internet as you know it will be gone. By then I hope your portfolio is empty.
On the bright side... I think the last two cash outs will be dotCOM and dotTV.
This is the basis behind how I picked my crappy few .TV domains. I'll write up a long post on what and why and let you all laugh some more at my crazier than than the antifan.tv beliefs.:hearts:
Last edited:
















