NameSilo

What are CVCV.infos going for?

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch

FPForum

Top Member
Impact
1,436
Seams like most (if not all) are gone now..Just curious what kind of value a CVCV.info would have at this time? Also, what are your thoughts about..say..a year from now?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
FPForum said:
Seams like most (if not all) are gone now..Just curious what kind of value a CVCV.info would have at this time? Also, what are your thoughts about..say..a year from now?

They really aren't going for much yet. Most are still fetching less than renewal costs.

I'm sitting on 400 of them, so I obviously hope that'll change in a year, but who knows? :)
 
0
•••
Unless people start buying out the CVCV.org, the value in CVCV.info will be in selling to endusers, not resellers.
 
0
•••
Probably many of them are still reg fee but good CVCV completely taken and have some value.

meto.info $45
kami.info $106
bari.info $665
tula.info $260
 
0
•••
I disagree with the notion that a CVCV.org buyout is necessary for CVCV.infos to have value. IMO, .org is a poor extension for CVCV names and this is partially elucidated by the buyout of .info prior to .org -- although obviously other factors are involved.

I have a few CVCV.infos getting >100 monthly uniques but not many clicks. Whether these are domainers seeking them out, I do not know.. But one thing is clear -- someone is interested in many of these names.
 
0
•••
NameBio Stats
(All Domains selling for >$99 included)
CVCV.ORG
deka.org $998 2007-03-26 Sedo
tapu.org $100 2007-02-07 Sedo
goye.org $100 2007-01-25 Sedo
leve.org $3,088 2007-01-04 BuyDomains
date.org $150,349 2006-12-20 SnapNames
mecu.org $3,436 2006-02-14 SnapNames
visa.org $15,355 2006-02-07 SnapNames
VCVC.ORG
avid.org $13,750 2007-04-03 Moniker
oned.org $5,000 2007-02-01 AfterNic
anal.org $5,500 2007-01-18 Moniker Internext
etam.org $1,000 2006-11-25 BuyDomains
CVCV.INFO
kami.info $106 2007-04-03 Sedo
bari.info $665 2007-02-05 Sedo
tula.info $260 2005-05-13 Afternic
VCVC.INFO
na

Sure, you can buy 6 .INFO for the price of 1 .ORG. This may make .INFO a better buy but I think that the stats speak for themselves.
 
0
•••
visa? date? anal? I think we need fair comparisons here :imho:

At the end of the day, cvcv.info is sold out and cvcv.org isn't. Corporations and organisations may be more interested in .orgs and hence have more money to pay for them, but I don't think you'll be seeing horrible cvcv.orgs fetching decent prices (or even the equivalent .info prices) anytime soon.

Cvcv.orgs are kind of like cvcv.mobis imo, they cater to a much smaller market than .info, .net. Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean they'll sell for less, just that they may be more difficult to sell as a whole and that may very well push down prices.
 
1
•••
So is there any more available of CVCV or VCVC .info out there today? or it's all dried up already.
 
0
•••
marktimmy said:
So is there any more available of CVCV or VCVC .info out there today? or it's all dried up already.

cvcv.info is all dried up. Many great VCVC.info left though!
 
0
•••
There is a nice CVCV info on TDNAM -----> Puxi.info

Available as we speak.
 
0
•••
kleszcz said:
Probably many of them are still reg fee but good CVCV completely taken and have some value.

meto.info $45
kami.info $106
bari.info $665
tula.info $260


"tula" is a town in russia, fyi
 
0
•••
Bari si a big town in Italy too. That went for cheap btw.

The problem I have with cvcv.info is that they may have appeal only for domainers.

There are two things to consider
1. CVCV's are not words but are potential brands.
2. Those who are looking for brandable domains, or acronyms are looking mainly in .com for that.

I was able to purchase some cvcv.info's for regfee but I skipped them.
 
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back