NameSilo

Weird Theory

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

VURG

VURGTop Member
Impact
553
I have explored the theory that sight is a combination of two senses: Direction and Focus.

If this theory is correct, I think I did well by getting DirectionAndFocus.com for reg fee.

I also got 40DaysOfFocus.com and PurposeAndFocus.com

Is this theory wrong?

If this theory is correct, I have another set of theories that correlate with this that should reveal a lot of bargain priced domain names.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Nice reg Phil :)

Also has meaning in marketing.

I have explored the theory that sight is a combination of two senses: Direction and Focus.

If this theory is correct, I think I did well by getting DirectionAndFocus.com for reg fee.
 
0
•••
Are you planning on developing these domains?
 
0
•••
I have explored the theory that sight is a combination of two senses: Direction and Focus.

If this theory is correct, I think I did well by getting DirectionAndFocus.com for reg fee.

I also got 40DaysOfFocus.com and PurposeAndFocus.com

Is this theory wrong?

If this theory is correct, I have another set of theories that correlate with this that should reveal a lot of bargain priced domain names.


Are you off your meds?
 
0
•••
Are you off your meds?

Maybe. I have exploring political theories the last 6 months. I have been seeing a repetition with political perspectives and been seeing a lot patterns in relating opinions to sensory organs. I am not sure about this but I see a lot of evidence of a mathematical relationship between personal feelings and the way we sense things physically.

I am confused about this and hence am exploring this a lot more.

If there is a reason to believe that the eye has more than one sense, then there would be a lot of money in domains to capitalise on changes in social dynamics that happens as this theory gains acceptance and hence I am raising this topic here.

However, I am not gambling on this theory. I am just buying a few cheap reg fee names associated with it.
 
0
•••
The separater "and" kills value IMO because they make the surroundings words interchangeable & the domain could easily be mistaken. I think they were a waste of reg fee.
 
0
•••
You could build a network of self-help sites around this. But more importantly....

I was laying in bed last night and staring at the ceiling fan. You know the way that looks. You can't see a single blade of the fan, but just a spinning blur.

I noticed that when I quickly looked in another direction to focus, for a split second I would see a freeze-frame of the fan. I mean, just for an instant, a very clear and still image of individuals fan blades flashed at me. As though they were taken with a high speed camera.

I thought that was pretty cool, it made me wonder how our perception worked. On some level, even when the fan is spinning, we can see individual blades. But we can't perceive them, except for a brief second by using this trick.

In short, by shifting my gaze I can experience a moment of perfectly focused perception.

It made me think that I just found a very interesting avenue of research, and oddly enough I saw your post today.

Synchronicity again?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
More like good weed... Man, you guys are "out there" (somewhere)

Throw a dog a bone and don't bogart that joint

lol

L2

You're transcending this thread to drugs. lol "I don't know what you've been smoking... but I want some."

:D
 
0
•••
You're transcending this thread to drugs. lol "I don't know what you've been smoking... but I want some."

:D

Sick guys :hehe:. dam son

No but seriously, this theory is realy deep - im more into the sientific part of it though (can't help it). Focus and direction is corrent enought, but the level of light entering the eye is also a very important part of sight.

- Im really looking forwards to what you make of this idea, so best of luck vurg :bah::snaphappy:
 
0
•••
I have explored the theory that sight is a combination of two senses: Direction and Focus.

If this theory is correct, I think I did well by getting DirectionAndFocus.com for reg fee.
You are unlikely to get anything for the domain in the context that it was registered in.
 
0
•••
You are unlikely to get anything for the domain in the context that it was registered in.


Have you visited scam.com too. That guy is funny.

I've read what he said.

Focus and Change, not focus and direction. I see a lot of potential medical applications based on his theory. I have a lot of good medical contacts. It may have weight to it.
 
0
•••
What about action? Intuition? Knowledge/Experience? Perspective?

You're better off getting general self-help domains than your current strategy in this area. The last of the aforementioned would have helped you...

But DirectionandFocus is alright if a little long. - I wouldn't have gotten it though, and I don't think you can turn it into what you're expecting to because like I said, those are far from the only things involved in success.
 
0
•••
There are more factors to it: (Mis)direction/perception/ideology/psychology etc. Keep that in mind.

David Copperfield had taught us a very important lesson: Seeing is not believing. It doesn't mean a thing.
 
0
•••
wow :)
this is a thread I'll have to come back to when drunk...
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com Registration $8.99Dynadot — .com Registration $8.99
Appraise.net

We're social

Unstoppable Domains
Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back